A comparative study of SOAP and DCOM

Journal of Systems and Software

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 157-169

  Davis, Alexander ^a   Zhang, Du ^b  

^a INTEL CORPORATION   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

DCOM; Distributed computing; Performance analysis; SOAP

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; DATA TRANSFER; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; INTEROPERABILITY; LIBRARIES; PERFORMANCE; REMOTE CONSOLES;

DCOM; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; SIMPLE OBJECT ACCESS PROTOCOL (SOAP);

NETWORK PROTOCOLS;

EID: 11144274525     PISSN: 01641212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2004.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Box D. House of COM. Microsoft Systems Journal. (July):1998
2. Box D. A Young Person's guide to the simple object access protocol: SOAP increases interoperability across platforms and languages. MSDN Magazine. (March):2000
3. Box D. House of COM. MSDN Magazine. (January):2000
4. Chappel D. Understanding Microsoft Windows 2000 Distributed Services. 2000;Microsoft Press
5. Davis, A., 2002. A Comparative Study of DCOM and SOAP. Master degree project, Department of Computer Science, California State University, Sacramento
6. Dedo, D., Nelson, G., 1997. Integrate the Enterprise, MSDN Library Microsoft Corporation
7. DeJesus E.X. SAML brings security to XML. XML Magazine. (February):2002
8. Dengler, C. 2000. Returning ADO Recordsets With SOAP Messaging, MSDN Library Microsoft Corporation
9. Fedorov A., et al. Professional Active Server Pages 2.0. 1998;WROX Press
10. Horstmann, M., Kirtland, M., 1997. DCOM Architecture, MSDN Library Microsoft Corporation
11. IETF, 1999. Hypertext Transfer Protocol - HTTP/1.1. RFC 2616, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt Internet Engineering Task Force
12. IETF, 2000. Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP/1.1. RFC 2817, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2817.txt Internet Engineering Task Force
13. Lowy J. Web Services. Hurdle the Firewall. Net Magazine. (Fall/Winter):2001
14. ® 2000 Magazine. (November):2001
15. MDN, 2000. Component Object Model Protocol (COM) Specification 0.9. Microsoft Developer Network, Microsoft Corporation
16. MSDN Library, 1996. DCOM Technical Overview. MSDN Library, Microsoft Corporation
17. MSDN Library, 1998. Distributed Component Object Model Protocol - DCOM/1.0. MSDN Library, Microsoft Corporation
18. MSDN Library, 2000. ISAPI and the Web Application Architecture. MSDN Library, Microsoft Corporation
19. MSDN Library, 2001. SOAP Toolkit 2.0 Documentation. MSDN Library, Microsoft Corporation
20. Netscape, 1996. SSL 3.0 Specification,
21. OASIS, 2001. SAML Specification, , Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards
22. OMG, 2004. CORBA/IIOP Specification, , Object Management Group
23. Ramasundaram S. WSDL: An Insight Out. XML Magazine. (October/November):2001
24. Sconnard, A., 2000. SOAP: The Simple Object Access Protocol. Microsoft Internet Developer (January)
25. Scribner K., Stiver M.C. Understanding SOAP. 2000;SAMS Publishing
26. Snell J., Tidwell D., Kulchenko P. Programming Web Services with SOAP. 2002;O'Reilly & Associates Inc
27. Sun Microsystems, 2004. Enterpise JavaBeansTM Specification,
28. The Open Group, 1997. DCE 1.1: Remote Procedure Call: CAE Specification, The Open Group
29. WWWC, 1996. Cascading Style Sheets, Level 1 Specification. , World Wide Web Consortium
30. WWWC, 1998. Document Object Model (DOM), Level 1 Specification, Version 1.0. , World Wide Web Consortium
31. WWWC, 1999a. XML XPath Language (XPath) Version 1.0. , World Wide Web Consortium
32. WWWC, 1999b. HTML 4.01 Specification. , World Wide Web Consortium
33. WWWC, 2000a. Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) 1.1. , World Wide Web Consortium
34. WWWC, 2000b. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0, second ed. , World Wide Web Consortium
35. WWWC, 2001. Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1. , World Wide Web Consortium
36. WWWC, 2002. Document Object Model (DOM), Level 3 Events Specification, Version 1.0. , World Wide Web Consortium