The tie effect in simple arithmetic: An access-based account

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1019-1031

  LeFevre, Jo Anne ^a   Shanahan, Tina ^a   DeStefano, Diana ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARITHMETIC; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PROBLEM SOLVING; STIMULATION;

EID: 11144264144     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196878     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. ASHCRAFT, M. H. (1992). Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory. Cognition, 44, 75-106.
2. ASHCRAFT, M. H. (1995). Cognitive psychology and simple arithmetic: A review and summary of new directions. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 3-34.
3. ASHCRAFT, M. H., & CHRISTY, K. S. (1995). The frequency of arithmetic facts in elementary texts: Addition and multiplication in grades 1-6. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 396-421.
4. BLANKENBERGER, S. (2001). The arithmetic tie effect is mainly encoding-based. Cognition, 82, B15-B24.
5. BLANKENBERGER, S., & VORBERG, D. (1997). The single-format assumption in arithmetic fact retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 721-738.
6. BUTTERWORTH, B., ZORZI, M., GIRELLI, L., & JONCKHEERE, A. R. (2001). Storage and retrieval of addition facts: The role of number comparison. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1005-1029.
7. CAMPBELL, J. I. D. (1987). Network interference and mental multiplication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 109-123.
8. CAMPBELL, J. I. D. (1994). Architectures for numerical cognition. Cognition, 53, 1-44.
9. CAMPBELL, J. I. D. (1995). Mechanisms of simple addition and multiplication: A modified network-interference theory and simulation. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 121-164.
10. CAMPBELL, J. I. D. (1997). On the relation between skilled performance of simple division and multiplication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1140-1159.
11. CAMPBELL, J. I. D. (1998). Linguistic influences in cognitive arithmetic: Comment on Noël, Fias, and Brysbaert (1997). Cognition, 67, 353-364.
12. CAMPBELL, J. I. D. (1999). Division by multiplication. Memory & Cognition, 27, 791-802.
13. CAMPBELL, J. I. D., & FUGELSANG, J. (2001). Strategy choice for arithmetic verification: Effects of numerical surface form. Cognition, 80, B21-B30.
14. CAMPBELL, S. I. D., & GUNTER, R. (2002). Calculation, culture, and the repeated operand effect. Cognition, 86, 71-96.
15. CAMPBELL, J. I. D., & XUE, Q. (2001). Cognitive arithmetic across cultures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 299-315.
16. FRENCH, J. W., EKSTROM, R. B., & PRICE, I. A. (1963). Kit of reference tests for cognitive factors. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
17. GEARY, D. C. (1996). The problem-size effect in mental addition: Developmental and cross-national trends. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 63-93.
18. GROEN, G. J., & PARKMAN, J. M. (1972). A Chronometric analysis of simple arithmetic. Psychological Review, 79, 329-343.
19. HAMANN, M. S., & ASHCRAFT, M. H. (1986). Textbook presentations of basic arithmetic facts. Cognition & Instruction, 3, 173-192.
20. HECHT, S. A. (1999). Individual solution processes while solving addition and multiplication math facts in adults. Memory & Cognition, 27, 1097-1107.
21. LEFEVRE, J., BISANZ, J., DALEY, K. E., BUFFONE, L., GREENHAM, S. L., & SADESKY, G. S. (1996). Multiple routes to solution of single-digit multiplication problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 284-306.
22. LEFEVRE, J., & LIU, J. (1997). Numerical cognition: Single-digit multiplication skills of adults from China and Canada. Mathematical Cognition, 3, 31-62.
23. LEFEVRE, J., SADESKY, G. S., & BISANZ, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem-size effect in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 216-230.
24. LEFEVRE, J., SMITH-CHANT, B. L., HISCOCK, K., DALEY, K. E., & MORRIS, J. (2003). Young adults' strategic choices in simple arithmetic: Implications for the development of mathematical representations. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise (pp. 203-228). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. LOFTUS, G. R., & MASSON, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
26. MILLER, K., PERLMUTTER, M., & KEATING, D. (1984). Cognitive arithmetic: Comparison of operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 46-60.
27. NOËL, M., FIAS, W., & BRYSBAERT, M. (1997). About the influence of presentation format on arithmetical fact-retrieval processes. Cognition, 63, 335-374.
28. NOËL, M., ROBERT, A., & BRYSBAERT, M. (1998). Does language really matter when doing arithmetic? Reply to Campbell (1998). Cognition, 67, 365-373.
29. PENNER-WILGER, M., LETH-STEENSEN, C., & LEFEVRE, J. (2002). Decomposing the problem-size effect: A comparison of response time distributions across cultures. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1160-1167.
30. RICKARD, T. C., & BOURNE, JR., L. E. (1996). Some tests of an identical elements model of basic arithmetic skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1281-1295.
31. RICKARD, T. C., HEALY, A. F., & BOURNE, JR., L. E. (1994). On the representation of arithmetic facts: Operand order, symbol, and operation transfer effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1139-1153.
32. SIEGLER, R. S., & SHRAGER, J. (1984). Strategy choices in addition and subtraction: How do children know what to do? In C. Sophian (Ed.), The origins of cognitive skills. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. SMITH-CHANT, B. L., & LEFEVRE, J. (2003). Doing as they are told and telling it like it is: Self-reports in mental arithmetic. Memory & Cognition, 31, 516-528.
34. ZBRODOFF, N. J. (1995). Why is 9 + 7 harder than 2 + 3? Strength and interference as explanations of the problem-size effect. Memory & Cognition, 23, 689-700.