Towards a customizable approach for cots selection

Proceedings of the Eigtht IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 665-671

  Mohamed, Abdallah ^a   Ruhe, Günther ^a   Eberlein, Armin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF SHARJAH   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS); Evaluation; Selection; Software Design and Development

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SELECTION AND EVALUATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA ACQUISITION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; EVALUATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

ADAPTABILITY; COMMERCIAL-OFF-THE-SHELF (COTS); EVALUATION PROCESS OPTIONS (EPO); SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 11144245532     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. R.L. Glass, Matching methodology to problem domain, Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 2004, 19-21.
2. G. Ruhe, Software Engineering Decision Support - A New Paradigm for Learning Software Organizations. Advances in Learning Software Organization. Lecture Notes In Computer Science Vol.2640, Springer, 2003, 104-115
3. M. Morisio, C.B. Seaman, A.T. Parra, V.R. Basilli, S.E. Kraft, & S.E. Condon, Investigating and Improving a COTS-Based Software Development Process. Proc. of ICSE, Limmerick, Ireland, 2000.
4. W.J. Lloyd, S. Ghosh, & J. Bieman, A Taxonomy of Processes for Component Selection. Proc. 16th International Conf. on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE'04), Banff, AB, 2004.
5. S. Kunda, A social-technical approach to selecting software supporting COTS-Based Systems, PhD thesis, University of York, UK, 2001
6. H. Kaindl, S. Brinkkemper, J.A. Bubenko Jr, B. Farbey, S.J. Greenspan, C.L. Heitmeyer, J.C.S.do Prado Leite, N.R. Mead, J. Mylopoulos, & J. Siddiqi, Requirements Engineering and Technology Transfer: Obstacles, Incentives and Improvement Agenda, Requirements Engineering Journal7(3), 2002, 113-123
7. Software Enineering Institute (SEI), Carnegie Mellon University, USA (http://www.sei.cmu.edu)
8. G. Ruhe, Intelligent Support for Selection of COTS Products, Web, Web-Services, and Database Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol.2593, Springer 2003, 34-45
9. M. Ochs, D. Pfahl, G. Chrobok-Diening & B. Nothhelfer-Kolb, A COTS Acquisition Process: Definition and Application Experience. Proc. of the ESCOM-SCOPE 2000, Munich, Germany, 2000.
10. N. Maiden & C. Ncube, Acquiring COTS Software Selection Requirements, IEEE Software 15(2), 1998, 46-56.
11. B.C. Phillips & S.M. Polen, Add Decision Analysis to Your COTS Selection Process. The Journal of Defence Software Engineering, April 2002.
12. J. Kontio, OTSO: A Systematic Process for Reusable Software Component Selection. CS-TR-3478, 1995, University of Maryland Technical Reports.
13. T. L. Saaty, The analytic hierarchy process (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990).
14. D.Carney, COTS Evaluation in the Real World. SEI Interactive, Carnegie Mellon University, December 1998.
15. CeBASE. NSF Center for Empirically Based Software Engineering, avail, at http://www.cebase.org/
16. th International Workshop on Learning Software Organizations, Banff, Canada, 2004
17. th ICSE'96, 1996 Berlin, Germany, 201-209.