Sample size considerations for assessing the equivalence of two process means

Quality Engineering

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 105-110

  Stein, Jeff ^a,b,c,d   Doganaksoy, Necip ^a,e,f,g,h  

^a GE GLOBAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^b University of Colorado College of Nursing   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Gen Elec's Corp R and D Center   (United States)

^f UNION COLLEGE   (United States)

^g AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION   (United States)

^h International Statistics Institute

Author keywords

Interval hypothesis; Practical significance; Statistical significance

Indexed keywords

EID: 11144236689     PISSN: 08982112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08982119908962563     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Devore, J. L., Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Brooks/Cole Publishing, Monterey, CA, 1987.
2. Ott, L., An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis, PWS-Kent, Boston, 1988.
3. Schuirmann, D. J., A Comparison of the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for Assessing the Equivalence of Average Bioavailability, J. Pharmacokin. Biopharmac., 15, 657-680 (1987).
4. Deming, W. E., On Probability as a Basis for Action, Am. Statistician, 29, 146-152 (1975).
5. Hahn, G. J. and Meeker, W. Q., Statistical Intervals: A Guide for Practitioners, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1991.
6. Westlake, W. J., Response to T. B. L. Kirkwood: Bioequivance Testing - A Need to Rethink, Biometrics, 37, 589-594 (1981).
7. Bristol, D. R., Probabilities and Sample Sizes for the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure, Commun. Statist. - Theory Methods, 22, 1953-1961 (1993).