The typology of Malay reflexives

Lingua

Volumn 115, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 627-644

  Cole, Peter ^a,b   Hermon, Gabriella ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY ANTHROPOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anaphor; Chinese; English; LD reflexive; Long distance reflexive; Malay; Pronoun; Reflexive; Semantics; Syntax

Indexed keywords

EID: 11044232423     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Battistella E. Chinese reflexivization: A movement to INFL approach Linguistics 27 1990 987-1012
2. Chomsky N. 1986. Knowledge of Language. Praeger, New York.
3. Cole P. Hermon G. Huang C.-T.J. 2001a. Long-Distance Reflexives: The State of the Art. Long Distance Reflexives. Syntax and Semantics, vol. 33. Academic Press, New York, pp. xiii-xvii
4. Cole P. Hermon G. Lee C.L. 2001b. Logophoric conditions on long distance reflexives in two Chinese dialects. In: Cole, P., Herman, G., Huang, C.-T.J. (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Long-Distance Reflexives, vol. 33. Academic Press, New York
5. Cole P. Hermon G. Sung L.-M. Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives Linguistic Inquiry 21 1990 1-22
6. Cole P. Hermon G. Sung L.-M. Feature percolation Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2 1993 91-118
7. Cole P. Hermon G. Long distance reflexives in Singapore Malay: an apparent typological anomaly Linguistic Typology 2 1998 1
8. Cole P. Sung L.-M. Head movement and long distance reflexives Linguistic Inquiry 25 1994 355-406
9. Cole P. Wang C. Antecedents and blockers of long distance reflexives: the case of Chinese Ziji Linguistic Inquiry 27 1996 3
10. Fiengo R. May R. 1992. Indices and Identity. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
11. Gil D. The structure of Riau Indonesian Nordic Journal of Linguistics 17 1994 179-200
12. Gil D. 1997. When is a reflexive not a reflexive? Forms containing Diri in the Riau and Irian dialects of Indonesian. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics
13. Gil D. 2001. Reflexive anaphor or conjunctive operator: Riau Indonesian Sendiri. In: Long Distance Reflexives. Syntax and Semantics, vol. 33. Academic Press, New York, pp. 83-118
14. Heim I. Anaphora and semantic interpretation: A reinterpretation of Reinhart's approach MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 25 1998 205-246
15. Hestvik A. LF movement of pronouns and antisubject orientation Linguistic Inquiry 23 1992 557-594
16. Huang Y.-H. 1984. Chinese Reflexives. Studies in English Linguistics and Literature. National Taiwan Normal University
17. Huang Y. A note on the head-movement analysis of long-distance reflexives Linguistics 34 1996 833-840
18. Keenan E.L. 1976. Logical expressive power and syntactic variation in natural language. In: Keenan, E.L. (Ed.), Formal Semantics for Natural Languages. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
19. Keenan E.L. 2000. An Historical Explanation of English Binding Theory, Presented at SHEL-1: Studies in the History of the English Language, vol. 1, UCLA
20. Kitagawa Y. Copying identity Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9 1991 497-536
21. Pica P. 1986. On the nature of the reflexivization cycle. In: Proceedings of NELS 17, vol. 2. GLSA, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, pp. 483-499
22. Sag I. 1977. Deletion and Logical Form. Doctoral Dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA
23. Sung L.-M. 1990. Universals of Reflexives. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana, IL
24. Williams E. 1977. Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 8.1