Public organizations, stakeholders and the construction of publicness. Claims and defence of authority in public action

Public Administration

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 975-992

  Demortain, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTHORITARIANISM; POLICY MAKING; STAKEHOLDER;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; WESTERN EUROPE; WORLD;

EID: 11044231956     PISSN: 00333298     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00427.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Borzel, T. 1998. 'What's so special about policy networks? An exploration of the concept and its usefulness in studying European governance', European Integration Online Papers, Vol. 1, No. 16 (http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1997-016a.htm).
2. Bozeman, B. 1987. All Organizations are Public: Bridging Public and Private Organizational Theories. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Bozeman, B. and S. Bretschneider. 1994. 'The "Publicness Puzzle" in Organization Theory: a Test of Alternative Explanations of Differences between Public and Private Organizations', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4, 2, 197-223.
4. Burt, R. 1995. 'Le capital social, les trous structuraux et l'entrepreneur', Revue Française de Sociologie, XXXVI, 4, 599-628.
5. Cook, F.L. and W.G. Skogan. 1991. 'Convergent and Divergent Voice Models of the Rise and Fall of Policy Issues', in D.L. Protess and M. McCombs (eds), Agenda setting. Readings on Media Public Opinion and Policy-making. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Dehousse, R. 2002. 'Misfits: EU Law and the Transformation of European Governance', Jean Monnet Working Papers, (http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/02/020201.html).
7. Di Maggio, P.J. and W. Powell. 1983. 'The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organization fields', American Sociological Review, 48, 4, 147-60.
8. Downs, A. 1972. 'Up and Down with Ecology. The Issue-attention Cycle', Public Interest, 28, 1.
9. Duran, P. 1999. Penser l'action publique. Paris: LGDJ.
10. Egeberg, M. 2002. 'An Organisational Approach to European Integration: What Organisations tells us about System Transformation, Committee Governance and Commission Decision Making', ARENA Working Papers, 02/19 (http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/wp02_l9.htm).
11. Greenwood, J. and R. Webster. 2000. 'Are EU Business Associations Governable?', European Integration Online Papers, Vol. 4, No. 3 (http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-003a.htm).
12. Greenwood, R., R. Suddaby and C.R. Hinings. 2002. 'Theorizing Change: the Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields', Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, No. 1, February, 58-80.
13. Hasselbladh, H. and J. Kallinikos. 2000. 'The Project of Rationalization: a Critique and Reappraisal of Neo-Institutionalism in Organization Studies', Organization Studies, Vol. 21, No. 4, 697-720.
14. Gaudin, J.P. 1999. Gouverner par central. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale de Science Politique.
15. Gusfield, J. 1981. The Culture of Public Problems. Drink-driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16. Haque, S. 2001. 'The Diminishing Publicness of Public Service under the Current Mode of Governance', Public Administration Review, 61, 1, 65-79.
17. Hayward, J. and V. Wright. 2002. Governing from the Centre. Core Executive Coordination in France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Heclo, H. 1974. Social Policy in Britain and Sweden, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19. Henshel, R. 1990. Thinking about Social Problems. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
20. Kingdon, J.W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
21. Lindblom, C. and E. Woodhouse. 1993. The Policy-making Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22. Lowi, T. 1972. 'Four Systems of Policy Politics and Choice', Public Administration Review, 32, 324-45.
23. March, J. and J. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.
24. Muller, P. 1996. 'Cinq défis majeurs pour I'analyse des politiques publiques', Revue Française de Science Politique, Vol. 46, No. 1, 96-102.
25. Never, J. 2000. 'The Regulation of Risks and the Power of the People: Lessons from the BSE Crisis', European Integration Online Papers (EIoP), Vol. 4, No. 6 (http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-006a.htm).
26. Rainey, H. and B. Bozeman. 2000. 'Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the a priori', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 2, 447-69.
27. Sabatier, P. 1988. 'An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-oriented Learning Therein', Policy Sciences, 21, 129-68.
28. Scott, R. 1987. 'The Adolescence of Institutional Theory', Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493-511.
29. Simon, H. 1945. Administrative Behaviour. New York: The Free Press.
30. Spector, M. and J. Kitsuse. 1977. Constructing Social Problems. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings.
31. Thoenig, J.-C. 1998. 'Politiques publiques et action publique', Revue internationale de politique comparée, No. 2, 295-314.
32. Thoenig, J.-C. 2001. 'Public Sector Organizations', International Encyclopedia of Business and Management, 2nd edn, 8 vols. London: Thomson Learning.
33. Parsons, W. 1995. Public Policy. An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
34. Hayward, J. and V. Wright. 2002. Governing from the Centre. Core Executive Coordination in France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.