Computational fluid dynamics-based optimization of a surface combatant

Journal of Ship Research

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 273-287

  Tahara, Y ^a   Stern, F ^b   Himeno, Y ^a  

^a Osaka Prefecture University   (Japan)

^b IA United States   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FLOW OF FLUIDS; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PRESSURE EFFECTS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; TURBULENCE;

BREAKING MODEL; DESIGN PARAMETERS; MESSAGE PASSING INTERFACE (MPI); SURFACE COMBATANT;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 11044229026     PISSN: 00224502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. BALDWIN, B. S., AND LOMAX, H. 1978 Thin Layer Approximation and Algebraic Model for Separated Turbulent Flows, AIAA Paper 78-257, 1-8.
2. BIRK, L., AND HARRIES, S. 2000 Automated optimization: a complementing technique for the hydrodynamic design of ships and offshore structures, Proceedings, COMPIT'2000, March, Potsdam.
3. DEJHALLA, R., MRSA, Z., AND VUKOVIC, S. 2001 Application of genetic algorithm for ship hull form optimization, International Ship Progress, 48, 2, 117-133.
4. GREENMAN, R. M., CHEUNG, S., AND TU, E. L. 1998 Coupled Navier-Stokes and optimizer analysis of a transonic wing, Journal of Aircraft, 35, 362-369.
5. HAMASAKI, J., HIMENO, Y., AND TAMARA, Y. 1996a Hull form optimization by nonlinear programming (Part 3) - improvement of stern form for minimizing viscous resistance, Journal of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, 225, 1-6 [Japanese].
6. HAMASAKI, J., HIMENO, Y., AND TAHARA, Y. 1996b Hull form optimization by nonlinear programming (Part 4) - improvement of stern form for wake and viscous resistance, Journal of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, 226, 15-21 [Japanese].
7. HICKS, R. M., AND HENNE, P. A. 1978 Wing design by numeical optimization, Journal of Aircraft, 15, 407-412.
8. HICKS, R. M., MURMAN, E. M., AND VANDERPLAATS, B. N. 1974 An Assessment of Airfoil Design by Numerical Optimization, NASA TM X-3092, Ames Research Center.
9. HINO, T. 1999 Shape optimization of practical ship hull forms using Navier-Stokes analysis, Proceedings, 7th International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, July, Nantes, France.
10. HINO, T., KODAMA, Y., AND HIRATA, N. 1998 Hydrodynamic shape optimization of ship hull forms using CFD, Proceedings, 3rd Osaka Colloquium on Advanced CFD Applications to Ship Flow and Hull Form Design (OC'98), May, Osaka, Japan, 533-541.
11. HUANG, C. H., CHIANG, C. C., AND CHOU, S. K. 1998 An inverse geometry design problem in optimizing hull surface, JOURNAL OF SHIP RESEARCH, 42, 2, 79-85.
12. IWASAKI, Y., TAHARA, Y., OKUNO, T., HIMENO, Y., AND YAMANO, T. 1996 Studies on relationship between water surface behind stern and stern end form of fine ships, Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 180, 13-20 [Japanese].
13. JAMESON, A. 1995 Optimum Aerodynamic Design Using CFD and Control Theory, AIAA paper 95-1729-CP.
14. JAMESON, A. 1999 Re-engineering the design process through computation, Journal of Aircraft, 36, 1, 36-50.
15. JANSON, C., AND LARSSON, L. 1996 A method for the optimization of ship hulls from a resistance point of view, Proceedings, 21st Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, June, Trondheim, Norway, 680-692.
16. JANSON, C. E., KIM, K. J., LARSSON, L., HOLM, D., AND ESPINO, B. 1994 Optimization of the Series 60 hull from a resistance point of view, SRICFD Workshop, March, Tokyo.
17. KIM, H. J., AND RHO, O. H. 1997 Dual-point design of transonic airfoils using the hybrid inverse optimization method, Journal of Aircraft, 34, 612-618.
18. KIM, H. J., AND RHO, O. H. 1998 Aerodynamic design of transonic wings using the target pressure optimization approach, Journal of Aircraft, 35, 671-677.
19. KITAMURA, T., TAHARA, Y., AND HIMENO, Y. 1997 A study on layout optimization problem of 2-D tandem hydrofoils under free surface, Journal of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, 228, 67-78 [Japanese].
20. LOWE, T., BLOOR, M., AND WILSON, M. 1994 The automatic functional design of hull surface geometry, JOURNAL OF SHIP RESEARCH, 38, 4, 319-328.
21. MASUDA, S., AND SUZUKI, K. 2001 Experimental verification of optimized hull form based on Rankine source method, Journal of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, 236, 27-33 [Japanese].
22. NEWMAN III, J. C., TAYLOR IV, A. C., BARNWELL, R. W., NEWMAN, P. A., AND HOU, G. J. W. 1999 Overview of sensitivity analysis and shape optimization for complex aerodynamic configurations, Journal of Aircraft, 36, 1, 87-96.
23. NOWACKI, H. 1993 Hull form variation and evaluation, Journal of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, 219, 173-184.
24. PAPAY, M. L., AND WALTERS, R. W. 1995 A General Inverse Design Procedure for Aerodynamic Bodies, AIAA paper 95-0088.
25. PATERSON, E., WILSON, R., AND STERN, F. 1998 Verification/validation of steady flow RANS for Model 5415, Proceedings, 1st Marine CFD Applications Symposium, May, McLean, VA.
26. PERI, D., AND CAMPANA, E. F. 2003 Multidisciplinary design optimization of a naval surface combatant, JOURNAL OF SHIP RESEARCH, 47, 1, 1-12.
27. PERI, D., ROSSETTI, M., AND CAMPANA, E. F. 2001 Design optimization of ship hulls via CFD techniques, JOURNAL OF SHIP RESEARCH, 45, 2, 1-10.
28. Proceedings, 3rd Osaka Colloquium on Advanced CFD Applications to Ship Flow and Hull Form Design (OC'98). 1998 Osaka, Japan.
29. REUTHER, J. J., JAMESON, A., ALONSO, J. J., RIMLINGER, M. J., AND SAUNDERS, D. 1999a Constrained multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization using an adjoint formulation and parallel computers, Part 1, Journal of Aircraft, 36, 1, 51-60.
30. REUTHER, J. J., JAMESON, A., ALONSO, J. J., RIMLINGER, M. J., AND SAUNDERS, D. 1999b Constrained multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization using an adjoint formulation and parallel computers, Part 2, Journal of Aircraft, 36, 1, 61-74.
31. RHEE, S. H., AND STERN, F. 2002 RANS model for spilling breaking waves, ASME Journal of Fluid Engineering, 124, 1-9.
32. SAKUMA, S., AND BESSHO, M. 1998 A theoretical design for auxiliary ship hull forms, Proceedings, 3rd Osaka Colloquium on Advanced CFD Ap plications to Ship Flow and Hull Form Design (OC'98), May, Osaka, Japan, 407-423.
33. SAMARREH, J. A. 1999 Status and future of geometry modeling and grid generation for design and optimization," Journal of Aircraft, 36, 1, 97-104.
34. SR229 Annual Reports, Shipbuilding Research Association of Japan. 1996-1999 [Japanese, unpublished].
35. STERN, F., PATERSON, E. G., AND TAHARA, Y. 1996 CFDSHIP-IOWA: Computational Fluid Dynamics Method for Surface-Ship Boundary Layers, Wakes, and Wave Fields, IIHR Report No. 381, Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research, Iowa City, IA.
36. STERN, F., WILSON, R. V., COLEMAN, H. W., AND PATERSON, E. G. 1999 Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations, IIHR Report No. 407, Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research, Iowa City, IA.
37. STERN, F., WILSON, R. V., COLEMAN, H. W., AND PATERSON, E. G. 2001 Comprehensive approach to verification and validation of CFD simulations - Part 1: methodology and procedures, ASME Journal of Fluid Engineering, 123, 793-802.
38. SUZUKI, K., CALISAL, S. M., AND TAMASHIMA, M. 1994 Hull form improvement of fishing vessel by non-protruding bow bulb, Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 31, 1-8.
39. TAHARA, Y., ANDO, J., AND HIMENO, Y. 2001 CFD-based optimization of tanker stern form - minimization of delivered horsepower using self-propulsion simulator, Proceedings, 8th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures (PRADS 2001), September, Shanghai, 719-724.
40. TAHARA, Y., AND HIMENO, Y. 1998 A study on form optimization problem based on CFD for two-dimensional wing section, Journal of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, 229, 27-35 [Japanese].
41. TAHARA, Y., HIMENO, Y., AND TSUKAHARA, T. 1998 An application of computational fluid dynamics to tanker hull form optimization problem, Proceedings, 3rd Osaka Colloquium on Advanced CFD Applications to Ship Flow and Hull Form Design (OC'98), May, Osaka, Japan, 515-531.
42. TAHARA, Y., AND IWASAKI, Y. 1997 A study of transom-stern free-surface flows by 2-D computational and experimental models, Journal of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, 227, 7-19 [Japanese]; also, Proceedings, 2nd Conference for New Ship and Marine Technology into 21st Century, Hong Kong, June 1998, 83-92 [English].
43. TAHARA, Y., AND IWASAKI, Y. 1997 A study of transom-stern free-surface flows by 2-D computational and experimental models, Journal of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, 227, 7-19 [Japanese]; also, Proceedings, 2nd Conference for New Ship and Marine Technology into 21st Century, Hong Kong, June 1998, 83-92 [English].
44. TAHARA, Y., SAITOH, Y., AND HIMENO, Y. 1999a CFD-aided optimization of tanker stern form (1st report) - minimization of viscous resistance, Journal of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, 231, 29-36 [Japanese].
45. TAHARA, Y., SAITOH, Y., MATSUYAMA, H., AND HIMENO, Y. 1999b CFD-aided optimization of tanker stern form (2nd report) - minimization of delivered horse power, Journal of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, 232, 9-17 [Japanese].
46. TAHARA, Y., AND STERN F. 1996 A large-domain approach for calculating ship boundary layers and wakes for nonzero Froude number, Journal of Computational Physics, 127, 398-411.
47. WEBSTER, J., AND MUTNICK, I. 1998 Future surface combatant, Proceedings, 25th ATTC Conference, September, Iowa City, IA.
48. WILSON, R., PATERSON, E., AND STERN, F. 1998 Unsteady RANS simulation of Model 5415 in waves, Proceedings, 22nd Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, August, Washington, D.C., 532-549.
49. WILSON, R., PATERSON, E., AND STERN, F. 2000 Verification and validation for RANS simulation of a naval combatant, Proceedings, Workshop on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics (Gothenburg 2000), September, Gothenburg, Sweden.
50. WILSON, R. V., STERN, F., COLEMAN, H. W., AND PATERSON, E. G. 2001 Comprehensive approach to verification and validation of CFD simulations - Part 2: application for RANS simulation of a cargo/container ship, ASME Journal of Fluid Engineering, 123, 803-810.
51. YASUKAWA, H. 2000 Ship form improvement using genetic algorithm, Ship Technology Research, 47, 1.