Empiricism, paradigms, and data

Communication Monographs

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 343-351

  Bostrom, Robert N ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11044226094     PISSN: 03637751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0363452042000288319     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Berkeley, G. (1957). A treatise concerning the principles of human knowledge. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. (Original work published 1710)
2. Berlo, D., Lemmert, J., & Mertz R. (1969). Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33, 563-576.
3. Bostrom, R. N. (1966). Motivation and argument. In G. R. Miller & T. Nilsen (Eds.), Perspectives in argumentation (pp. 110-128). Chicago, IL: Scott, Foresman, & Company.
4. Bostrom, R. N. (1983). Persuasion. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Bostrom, R. N. (2003). Theories, data, and communication research. Communication Monographs, 70, 275-294.
6. Bostrom, R. N., & Donohew, R. L. (1992). The case for empiricism: Clarifying fundamental issues in communication theory. Communication Monographs, 59, 109-128.
7. Bostrom, R. N., & Harrington, N. G. (1998). An exploratory study of compulsive talkers. Communication Education, 43, 78-91.
8. Carnap, R. (1953). Testability and meaning. In H. Feigl & M. Brodbeck (Eds.), Readings in the philosophy of science (pp. 47-52). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
9. Cohen, B. (1985). Revolution in science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Festinger, L. (1956). A theory of cognitive dissonance. New York: Harper & Row.
11. Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schacter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails: A social and psychological study of a modern group that predicted the destruction of the world. New York: Harper & Row.
12. Fetzer, J. (1974). Statistical explanation. In K. Shaffner & R. Cohen (Eds.), Boston studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 71-93). Boston: Philosophy of Science Association.
13. Goldsmith, D. J., & Baxter, L. A. (1996). Constituting relationships in talk: A taxonomy of speech events in social and personal relationships. Human Communication Research, 23, 87-114.
14. Hamilton, D. (1994). Traditions, preferences, and postures in applied qualitative research, In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 76-101). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Harrington, N., & Bostrom, R. (1996). Objectivism as the basic context for theory and research in communication. In J. L. Owen (Ed.), Context and communication behavior (pp. 118-143). Reno, NV: Context Press.
16. Hunt, S. (1976). Marketing theory: Conceptual foundations for research in marketing. Columbus, OH: Grid.
17. Jacoby, W. G. (1991). Data theory and dimensional analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. Krugman, P. (2003). The great unravelling: Losing our way in the twentieth century. New York: W. W. Norton.
19. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
22. Pavitt, C. (1999). The third way: Scientific realism and communication theory. Communication Theory, 9, 162-188.
23. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: W. W. Norton.
24. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: W. W. Norton.
25. Reardon, K. K., & Rogers, E. M. (1988). Interpersonal versus mass media communication: A false dichotomy. Human Communication Research, 15, 284-303.
26. Ruud, G. (1995). The symbolic construction of organizational identities and community in a regional symphony. Communication Studies, 46, 201-222.
27. Weiss, J. (1990). Unconscious mental functioning. Scientific American, 262(3), 103-109.