The Rudzki inversion gravimetric reduction scheme in geoid determination

Journal of Geodesy

Volumn 78, Issue 4-5, 2004, Pages 272-282

  Bajracharya, S ^a   Sideris, M G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Geoid; Helmert's condensation method; Indirect effects; Residual terrain modeling; Rudzki reduction

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL TERRAIN MODEL; GEODESY; GEOID; GRAVIMETRY; TOPOGRAPHY;

EID: 10944270223     PISSN: 09497714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00190-004-0397-y     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abd-Elmotaal HA, Kühtreiber N (2003) Geoid determination using adapted reference field, seismic Moho depths and variable density contrast. J Geod 77:77-85
2. Bajracharya S (2003) Terrain effects on geoid determination. MSc thesis, rep 20181, Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary
3. Forsberg R (1984) A study of terrain reductions, density anomalies and geophysical inversion methods in gravity field modeling. Rep 355, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Colombus
4. Haagmans R, de Min E, van Gelderen M (1993) Fast evaluation of convolution integrals on the sphere using 1D FFT and a comparison with existing methods for Stokes' integral. Manuscr Geod 18:227-241
5. Heck B (1993) A revision of Helmert's second method of condensation in geoid and quasigeoid determination. IAG Symp 112. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp246-251
6. Heck B (2003) On Helmert's methods of condensation. J Geod 77:155-170
7. Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy. Freeman, San Fransisco
8. Heiskanen WA, Vening Meinesz FA (1958) The earth and its gravity field. McGraw-Hill, New York
9. Kellogg OD (1929) Foundations of potential theory. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (reprinted by Dover, New York, 1953)
10. Kuhn M (2003) Geoid determination with density hypotheses from isostatic models and geological information. J Geod 77:50-65
11. Lambert WD (1930) The reduction of observed values of gravity to sea level, Bull Géod 26:107-181
12. Lemoine FG, Kenyon SC, Factor JK, Trimmer RG, Pavlis NK, Chinn DS, Cox CM, Klosko SM, Luthcke SB, Torrence MH, Wang YM, Williamson RG, Pavlis EC, Rapp RH, Olson TR (1998) The development of the joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) geopotential model EGM96. NASA/TP-1998-206861, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Maryland
13. Macmillan WD (1958) The theory of the potential. Dover, New York
14. Pellinen LP (1962) Accounting for topography in the calculation of quasigeoidal heights and plumbline deflections from gravity anomalies. Bull Géod 63:57-65
15. Nagy D (1966) The prism method for terrain corrections using digital computers. Pure Appl Geophys 63:31-39
16. Rudzki MP (1905) Sur la determination de la figure de la terre dapres les mesures de la gravite. Bull Astron Ser B22:1905
17. Sideris MG (1990) Rigorous gravimetric terrain modeling using Molodensky's operator. Manuscr Geod 15:97-106
18. Vanicek P, Martinec Z (1994) The Stokes-Helmert scheme for the evaluation of precise geoid. Manuscr Geod 19:119-128
19. Wang YM, Rapp RH (1990) Terrain effects on geoid undulations. Manuscr Geod 15:23-29
20. Wichiencharoen C (1982) The indirect effects on the computation of geoid undulations. Rep 336, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University Columbus