Author disincentives and open access

Serials Review

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 288-291

  Anderson, Rick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10944268294     PISSN: 00987913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. For example, see related discussion threads in the LIBLICENSE-L archives ( http://www.library.yale.edu/∼llicense/ListArchives/ ).
2. For example, see the Organisation on Economic Cooperation and Development's Declaration on Open Access to Research Data from Public Funding. http://www.oecd.org/document/0,2340,en_2649_34487_25998799_1_1_1_1,00.html (August 2, 2004).
3. Peter Suber discusses ways of increasing prestige for OA journals in his excellent “The Primacy of Authors in Achieving Open Access.” Nature Web Focus: Access to the Literature , 2004. http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/24.html (August 2, 2004).
4. PLoS is available in print as well as online; however, to the degree that it is perceived as primarily an online publication that can be printed and mailed rather than as a print publication with an online presence, its standing will likely continue to suffer from the general prejudice against online journals.
5. Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. http://www.zim.mpg.de/openaccess-berlin/berlindeclaration.html (August 2, 2004).
6. Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing. http://www.biomedcentral.com/openaccess/bethesda/ (August 2, 2004).
7. Budapest Open Access Initiative. http://www.soros.org/openacc ess/read.shtml , (August 2, 2004).
8. Jan Velterop, discussion list message, “Re: OA and Copyright – Andy Gass quote in LJ News Wire ,” July 2, 2004. (accessed August 2, 2004).