A time for everything: How the timing of novel contributions influences project team outcomes

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 279-292

  Ford, Cameron ^a   Sullivan, Diane M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10944266054     PISSN: 08943796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/job.241     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950-967.
2. Barrett, F. J. (1998). Creativity and improvisation in jazz organizations: implications for organizational learning. Organization Science, 9(5), 605-622.
3. Basadur, M., & Head, M. (2002). Team performance and satisfaction: a link to cognitive style within a process framework. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(4), 227-245.
4. Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
5. Dougherty, D., & Heller, T. (1994). The illegitimacy of successful product innovation in established firms. Organization Science, 5(2), 200-218.
6. Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: a sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 286-308.
7. Druskat, V. U., & Kayes, D. C. (2000). Learning versus performance in short-term project teams. Small Group Research, 31(3), 328-352.
8. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 350-383.
9. Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112-1142.
10. Ford, C. M., & Gioia, D. A. (2000). Factors influencing creativity in the domain of managerial decision making. Journal of Management, 26, 705-732.
11. Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 9-41.
12. Gersick, C. J. G. (1989). Marking time: predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 274-309.
13. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradictions in social analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14. Gilbert, C., & Bower, J. L. (2000). Disruptive change: when trying harder is part of the problem. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 95-101.
15. Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: a model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
16. Goodman, P., Ravlin, E., & Schminke, M. (1987). Understanding groups in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 121-173.
17. Hackman, J. R. (1983). A normative model of work team effectiveness (Tech. Rep. No. 2). New Haven, CT: Yale School of Organization and Management, Research Program on Groups Effectiveness.
18. Hackman, R., & Walton, R. (1986). Leading groups in organizations. In P. Goodman (Ed.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 72-119). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 716-749.
20. Haspasalo, H., & Kess, P. (2001). In search of organizational creativity: the role of knowledge management. Creativity and Innovation Management, 10(2), 110-119.
21. Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1988). The conditions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Kahn, R. L., & Byosiere, P. (1992). Stress in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 445-505). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
23. Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). There's no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees' creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 757-768.
24. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
25. McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). The study of small groups, past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 95-105.
26. McGrath, J. E., & Tschan, F. (2003). Dynamics in groups and teams. In M. S. Poole, & A. H. Van de Ven (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Nutt, P. C. (1999). Surprising but true: half of decisions in organizations fail. Academy of Management Executive, 13(4), 75-90.
28. Okhuysen, G. A. (2001). Structuring change: familiarity and formal interventions in problem-solving groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 794-808.
29. Okhuysen, G. A., & Waller, M. J. (2002). Focusing on midpoint transitions: an analysis of boundary conditions. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1056-1065.
30. Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
31. Powell, W. W. (1991). Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 183-203). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32. Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D., & Teach, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 120-151.
33. Reiter-Palmon, R., Mumford, M. D., & Rhrelfall, K. V. (1998). Solving everyday problems creatively: the role of problem construction and personality type. Creativity Research Journal, 11(3), 187-197.
34. Schrage, M. (2000). Serious play: How the world's best companies simulate to innovate. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
35. Sethi, R., Smith, D. C., & Park, C. W. (2002). How to kill a team's creativity. Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 16-18.
36. Shalley, C. E. (2002). How valid and useful is the integrative model for understanding work groups' creativity and innovation? Applied Psychology, 51(3), 406-511.
37. Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2000). Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 215-223.
38. Smith, J., & Koppel, T. (1999). The deep dive: one company's secret weapon for innovation [Television series episode]. In Nightline. United States: ABC News/American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
39. Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315-331.
40. Tuckman, B. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 389-399.
41. Tuckman, B., & Jensen, M. (1977). Stages of small-group development. Groups and Organizational Studies, 2, 419-427.
42. Waller, M. J. (1999). The timing of adaptive group responses to nonroutine events. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 127-137.
43. Waller, M. J., Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., & Giambatista, R. C. (2002). Watching the clock: group pacing behavior under dynamic deadlines. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1046-1055.
44. Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
45. West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: an integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology, 51(3), 355-385.
46. Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2002). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-697.