Strong opposition: Frame-based resistance to collaboration

Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 166-176

  Gray, Barbara ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Conflict; Framing; Resistance

Indexed keywords

EID: 10944253642     PISSN: 10529284     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/casp.773     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Benford, R., & Snow, D. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639.
2. Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. New York: Hafner Press.
3. Dawson, G. (1995). BWCA 'yuppies' are reason for lawmaker's bill. Saint Paul Pioneer Press, April 24, 2B.
4. Duluth News Tribune. (1994). 23 September.
5. Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. (1998). Voyageurs national park: Final report of the mediation panel. Minneapolis, MN: FMCS.
6. Folberg, J. E., & Taylor, A. (1984). Mediation: A comprehensive guide to resolving conflicts without litigation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Gamson, W. A. (1995). Constructing social protest. In H. Johnston, & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 85-106). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
8. Gray, B. (1985). Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Human Relations, 38, 911-936.
9. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10. Gray, B. (1997). Framing and reframing of intractable environmental disputes. In R. Lewicki, B. Sheppard, & R. Bies (Eds.), Research in negotiation in organizations (vol. 6, pp. 163-188). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.
11. Gray, B. (2003). Framing of environmental disputes. In R. Lewicki, B. Gray, & M. Elliott (Eds.), Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases (pp. 11-34). Washington, DC: Island Press.
12. Gray, B., & Hanke, R. (2001). Frame repertoires and non-collaborative behaviour in an intractable environmental conflict. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Washington, DC, August.
13. Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 255-269.
14. Hunt, S. A., Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (1994). Identity fields: Framing processes and the social construction of movement identities. In E. Larana, H. Johnston, & J. Gusfeld (Eds.), New social movements: from ideology to identity (pp. 185-208). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
15. Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaborative agendas: How things happen in a (not quite) joined up world. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1159-1175.
16. Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2003). Nurturing collaboration relations: Building trust in interorganizational collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(1), 5-31.
17. Lam, J. A., Rifkin, J., & Townley, A. (1989). Reframing conflict: Implication for fairness in parent-adolescent mediation. Mediation Quarterly, 7(1), 235-257.
18. Lewicki, R. Gray, B., & Elliott, M. (Eds.). (2003). Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases. Washington, DC: Island Press.
19. Lewicki, R., Saunders, D., & Minton, J. (1999). Negotiation. Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
20. Montville, J. V. (1995). The nature and psychology of civil society. In J. Braun (Ed.), Social pathology in comparative perspective (pp. 158-173). New York: Praeger.
21. Moore, C. W. (1986). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22. Myers, J. (1997a). Little-known council to vote on Voyageurs. Duluth News Tribune, February 14, 9B.
23. Myers, J. (1997b). A vote to keep talking. Duluth News Tribune, February 15, 4C.
24. Rothman, J. (1997). Resolving identity-based conflict in nations, organizations, and communities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25. Parkinson, P. D. (2000). Voyageurs national park: General management plan, environmental impact statement, visitors use and facilities plan. Review and evaluation. Two Harbors, MN: The Parkinson Group.
26. Schein, E. H. (1970). Organizational psychology (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27. Schon, D., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
28. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage.
29. Tannen, D. (1979). What's in a frame? Surface evidence of underlying expectations. In R. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processes (pp. 137-181). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
30. Vaughan, E., & Siefert, M. (1992). Variability in the framing of risk issues. Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), 119-135.
31. Volkan, V. A., Julius, D. A., & Montville, J. V. (1991). The psychodynamics of international relationships. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
32. Witzig, F. (2000). Eighty years in the making: A legislative history of Voyageurs National Park, 1997-1998 season, December 2.
33. Wondolleck, J. (1985). The importance of process in resolving environmental disputes. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 5, 341-356.
34. Yarborough, E., & Wilmot, W. (1995). Artful mediation: Constructive conflict at work. Boulder, CO: Cairns Publishing.