Rescaling and reforming the state under NAFTA: Implications for subnational authority

International Journal of Urban and Regional Research

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 858-873

  Warner, Mildred ^a   Gerbasi, Jennifer ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BILATERAL AGREEMENT; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; NAFTA; NATION STATE; TRADE AGREEMENT;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 10944251303     PISSN: 03091317     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00556.x     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Amin, A. and S. Graham (1997) The ordinary city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers New Series, 22.4, 411-29.
2. Amin, A. and S. Graham and J. Hauser (1997) Beyond market and hierarchy: interactive governance and social complexity. Edward Elgar, Lyme.
3. Appleton, B. (1994) Navigating NAFTA. A concise user's guide to the North American Free Trade Agreement. Carswell Thomson Professional Publishing, Rochester.
4. Bennett, R.J. (ed.) (1990) Decentralization, local governments and markets: towards a post-welfare agenda. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
5. Blanchard, L.A., C.C. Hinnant and W. Wong (1998) Market-based reforms in government: toward a social subcontract? Administration & Society 30.5, 483-512.
6. Bottari, M. and L. Wallach (2001) NAFTA Chapter 11 Investor-to-state cases: bankrupting democracy. Public Citizen, Washington, DC.
7. Brenner, N. (1999) Globalisation as reterritorialisation: the re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union. Urban Studies 36, 431-51.
8. Brenner, N. (2000) The urban question as a scale question: reflections on Henri Lefebvre, urban theory and the politics of scale. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24.2, 361-78.
9. Brenner, N. and N. Theodore (2002) Preface: From the 'New Localism' to the spaces of neoliberalism. Antipode 341-47.
10. Butler, L. (2002) Dia de la Raza - Colombus Day becomes day of action against recolonization via FTAA and Plan Puebla Panama. Upstream Journal Montreal, Quebec (www.s-j-c.net/DiadelaRaza.htm).
11. Callies, D.L. (ed.) (1996) Takings: Land Development Conditions and Regulatory Takings after Dolan and Lucas. American Bar Association State and Local Government Law Section, Chicago.
12. Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) (2001) Dollars and democracy: Canadians pay the price of privatization, Annual report on privatization. CUPE, Ottawa, CA (www.cupe.ca/issues/privatization/arp/default.asp).
13. Cerny, P.G. (1999) Globalization and the erosion of democracy. European Journal of Political Research 36, 1-26.
14. Charnovitz, S. (1992) GATT and the environment: examining the issues. International Environmental Affairs 4.3, 203-33.
15. Dalton, R.E. (1999) United States national treatment law and practice. In M. Leigh and L.B. Ederington (eds.), United States, American Society of International Law, Washington, DC.
16. De Palma, A. (2001) NAFTA's powerful little secret. New York Times 11 March, F-1.
17. Denhardt, J.V. and R.B. Denhardt (2003) The new public service: serving, not steering. M.E. Sharp Inc, Armonk, NY.
18. Eagle, S. (1997) Testimony to the House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution. Subcommittee Hearing on State Approaches to Protecting Private Property Rights, 23 September, Washington, DC.
19. Eagle, S. (2001) Regulatory takings. Second edition, Lexis Publishing, Charlottesville, VA.
20. Eisenger, P. (1988) The rise of the entrepreneurial state. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
21. Epstein, R.A. (1985) Takings: private property and the power of eminent domain. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
22. Esty, D. (1994) Greening the GATT: trade, environment, and the future The Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.
23. Fainstein, S. (2001) Competitiveness, cohesion and governance: their implications for social justice. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25.4, 884-8.
24. Forero, J. (2002) Still poor, Latin Americans protest push for open markets. The New York Times 19 July,A1.
25. Frug, G.E. (1999) City making: building communities without building walls. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
26. Gordon, M.C. (2001) Democracy's new challenge: globalization, governance, and the future of American federalism. DEMOS, New York (www.demos-usa.org/Pubs/Global/grndts_democ_710.pdf).
27. Greider, W. (2001a) Sovereign corporations. The Nation 30 April (www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20010430&s=greider).
28. Greider, W. (2001b) The right and US trade law: invalidating the 20th century. The Nation 15 October, 21-9.
29. Gullo, K. (2002) Oil refineries found liable in MTBE case. The Houston Chronicle 17 April, 1.
30. Guttman, D. (2000) Public purpose and private service: the twentieth century culture of contacting out and the evolving law of diffused sovereignty. Administrative Law Review 52, 859-926.
31. Hefetz, A. and M. Warner (2004) Privatization and its reverse: explaining the dynamics of the government contracting process. Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory 14.2, 171-90.
32. Holston, J. and A. Appadurai (1999) Introduction. In J. Holston (ed.), Cities and citizenship, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
33. House Energy and Commerce Committee (2003) Trade in Services and E-Commerce: The Significance of the Singapore and Chile Free Trade Agreements. Hearing of the Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection Subcommittee, 8 May.
34. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) (2001) Public rights, public problems: a guide to NAFTA's controversial chapter on investor rights. World Wildlife Fund, Canada.
35. Jessop, B. (1997) The entrepreneurial city: re-imaging localities, redesigning economic governance or restructuring capital. In N. Jewson and S. MacGregor (eds.), Transforming cities: contested governance and new spatial divisions, Routledge, London.
36. Kass, S. and J.M. McCarroll (2000) The 'Metalclad' decision under NAFTA's Chapter 11. New York Law Journal October, NLP IP Company, New York.
37. Katz, M., (2001) The price of citizenship: redefining the American welfare state. Metropolitan Books, New York.
38. Kay, J., (2002) Two oil giants deceived public on MTBE's hazards, jury finds. San Francisco Chronicle 17 April, A1.
39. Kendall, D.T., T.J. Dowling and A.W. Schwartz (2000) Takings litigation handbook: defending takings challenges to land use regulations. American Legal Publishing Corporation, Ohio.
40. Kettl, D. (1993) Sharing power: public governance and private markets Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
41. King, N.J. (2002) A new curve slows fast-track: foes cite NAFTA-based claims to warn of trade bill's flaws. The Wall Street Journal Politics and Policy, 30 April, A4.
42. Kodrzycki, Y.K. (1994) Privatization of local public services: lessons for New England. New England Economic Review (May/June), 31-46.
43. Kuehl, S., Senator (2001a) Background Documentation for the Joint Hearing of the Senate Committee on Banking, Commerce and International Trade and the Senate Select Committee on International Trade Policy and State Legislation, held 16 May.
44. Kuehl, S., Senator (2001b) Letter to Ambassador Robert Zoellick, US Trade Representative Elect regarding United States trade policy, 31 January.
45. Kuehl, S., and Senator M. Machado (chairs) (2001) The Senate Committee on Banking and Commerce and International Trade and the Senate Select Committee on International Trade Policy and State Legislation Joint Informational Hearing on International Trade Agreements and the Role of the State. Transcript of Hearing, 16 May, Sacramento, CA.
46. Lazar, L. (2000) Dispute resolution: secret corporate weapon? Journal of Global Financial Markets Winter (www.sachnoff.com/publications/articles/nafta.htm).
47. Le Galès, P. (1998) Regulations and governance in European cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 482-506.
48. Lowery, D. (1998) Consumer sovereignty and quasi-market failure. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8.2, 137-72.
49. Lowi, T. and B. Ginsberg (2000) American government: freedom and power. Sixth edition, W.W. Norton, New York and London.
50. MacLeod, G. (2001) New regionalism reconsidered: globalization and the remaking of political economic space. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25.4, 804-29.
51. Mann, H. and K. von Moltke (1999) NAFTA's Chapter 11 and the environment. Working Paper, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Canada.
52. Mann, H. and M. Arraya (2002) An investment regime for the Americas. In C.L. Deere and D.C. Esty (eds.), Greening the Americas: NAFTA's lessons for hemispheric trade, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
53. Mehta, S. (2002) Phaseout cost in billions, analyst says. Los Angeles Times 20 April, B12.
54. Metalclad Corporation v. United Mexican States (2000) Final Award. Arbitration under Chapter 11 of the NAFTA, International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 25 September.
55. Methanex Corporation Statement of Claim (1999) In the Matter of a Claim Under Chapter 11, Section A of the NAFTA and In the Matter of an Arbitration Under UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules Between Methanex Corp. and the USA Represented by the Department of State, 3 December (www.state.gov/documents/organization/ 8772.pdf).
56. Methanex Corporation Draft Amended Claim (1999) Under Chapter 11 of NAFTA, Methanex Corp. v. The USA, United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, 12 February 2001.
57. Moyers, W. (2002) Trading democracy. Public Broadcasting System, Washington, DC (aired 5 February).
58. NAFTA Full texts (www.sice.oas.org/ tradee.asp#NAFTA).
59. NAFTA Claims repository (www.naftaclaims.org).
60. National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) and National Association of Towns and Townships (NATT) (2001) Letter to Robert Zoellick, U.S. Trade Representative. Federal Register, 31 July 2002, 67(147) (www.ncsl.org/statefed/ftaacomments02.htm).
61. National League of Cities (NLC) (2002) National Municipal Policy and Resolution Section 3.01 (C) Competitiveness, International Trade and Municipalities. NLC, Washington, DC.
62. Osborne, D.E. and T. Gaebler (1992) Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming government. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
63. Rausser, G. (2002) Social Costs of an MTBE Ban in California. Prepared Statement for the House Committee on Government Reform Subcommittee of Energy Policy, Natural Resources, and Regulatory Affairs, 23 April.
64. Rhodes, R.A.W. (1996) New governance: governing without government. Political Studies XLIV, 652-67.
65. Roosevelt, M. (2002) Toxic trade? Time Magazine March, 14.
66. Salamon, L. (2002) The new governance and the tools of public action: an introduction. In L.M. Salamon and O.V. Elliott (eds.), The tools of government: a guide to the New governance, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
67. Sassen, S. (2001) Globalisation and the geography of centrality. Paper presented at the Global Tensions Conference, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. 9-10 March (www.people.cornell.edu/pages/sb24/Global_Tensions/).
68. Savas, E.S. (2000) Privatization and public-private partnership. Chatham, New York.
69. Schamis, H. (2000) Re-forming the state: the politics of privatization in Latin America and Europe. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
70. Sclar, E.D. (2000) You don't always get what you pay for: the economics of privatization. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
71. Shrybman, S. (2002) Thirst for control: new rules in the global water grab. The Council of Canadians, Toronto, Canada (www.canadians.org/documents/campaigns-tfc.pdf).
72. Starr, P. (1988) The meaning of privatization. Yale Law and Policy Review 6, 6-41.
73. Stein, E. (2001) International integration and democracy: no love at first sight. American Journal of International Law 95 A.JIL, July, 489.
74. Stokes, B. (2001) Talk about unintended consequences! National Journal 26 March, 1592.
75. Stumberg, R. (1998) Sovereignty by subtraction: the multilateral agreement on investment. Cornell International Law Journal 31.3, 491-598.
76. Stumberg, R. (2001) Local-global conflict: the tension between trade agreements and California law. Harrison Institute for Public Policy, Washington, DC.
77. Swyngedouw, E. (1997) Neither global nor local: 'glocalization' and the politics of scale. In K. Cox (ed.), Spaces of globalization, Guilford Press, New York.
78. Thompson, B.H. (1995) Takings and water rights in water law: trends, policies and practice. In K.M. Carr and J.B. Crammond (eds.), Water law: trends, policies and practice, ABA Section of Natural Resources, Energy, and Environmental Law, Chicago, IL.
79. Tiebout, C.M. (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64.5, 416-24.
80. Trelease, R. (1971) Federal-State Relations in Water Law. Legal Study No. 5, Report NWC-L-71-014, National Water Commission National Technical Information Service, Arlington, Virginia.
81. Tysoe, Honorable Justice (2001) In the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Between the United Mexican States and Metalclad Corporation, Reasons for Final Judgment.
82. US Constitution (www.house.gov/ Constitution/Constitution.html).
83. US Statement of Defense In the Arbitration Under Chapter 11 of NAFTA and the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules Between Methanex Corporation and the USA. Statement of Defense of Respondent United States of America, 10 August 2000.
84. Wallach, L. and M. Sforza (1999) Who's trade organization? Corporate globalization and the erosion of democracy. Public Citizen Washington, DC.
85. Warner, M.E. and A. Hefetz (2001) Privatization and the market role of government. Briefing Paper, Economic Policy Institute, Washington, DC (www.epinet.org).
86. Webster, C.J. (1998) Public choice, Pigouvian and Coasian planning theory. Urban Studies 35.1, 53-75.