Optimal foraging among competitors and predators: A state-dependent model incorporating game theory

Israel Journal of Zoology

Volumn 50, Issue 2-3, 2004, Pages 170-185

  Richards, Shane A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; GAME THEORY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION RISK;

EID: 10944238402     PISSN: 00212210     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1560/kkc4-4cfd-5g57-edrg     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Axelrod, R,, Hamilton, W.D. 1981. The evolution of cooperation. Science 211: 1390-1396.
2. Barta, Z., Giraldeau, L.-A. 2000. Daily patterns of optimal producer and scrounger use under predation hazard: a state-dependent dynamic game analysis. Am. Nat. 155: 570-582.
3. Brown, J.S., Kotler, B.P., Bouskila, A. 2001. Ecology of fear: foraging games between predators and prey with pulsed resources. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 38: 71-87.
4. Bulmer, M. 1994. Theoretical evolutionary ecology. Sinauer Publishers.
5. Carothers, J.H., Jaksić, F.M. 1984. Time as aniche difference: the role of interference competition. Oikos 42: 403-406.
6. Charnov, E.L. 1976. Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem. Theor. Pop. Biol. 9: 129-136.
7. Houston, A.I., McNamara, J.M. 1988. Fighting for food: a dynamic version of the hawk-dove game. Evol. Ecol. 2: 51-64.
8. Houston, A.I., McNamara, J.M. 1999. Models of adaptive behaviour: an approach based on state. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
9. Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S., Subach, A. 1993. Mechanisms of species coexistence of optimal foragers: temporal partitioning by two species of sand dune gerbils. Oikos 67: 548-556.
10. Mangel, M., Clark, C.W. 1988. Dynamic modeling in behavioral ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
11. Martel, G., Dill, L.M. 1993. Feeding and aggressive behaviors in juvenile coho salmon Oncorhynchus-kisutch, under chemically-mediated risk of predation. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32: 365-370.
12. Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
13. McNamara, J.M., Webb, J.N., Collins, E.J., Szébely, T., Houston, A.I. 1997. A general technique for computing evolutionarily stable strategies based on errors in decision-making. J. Theor. Biol. 189:211-225.
14. Nash, J.F. 1951. Non-cooperative games. Ann. Math. 54: 286-295.
15. Richards, S.A. 2002. Temporal partitioning and aggression among foragers: modeling the effects of stochasticity and individual state. Behav. Ecol. 13: 427-438.
16. Richards, S.A., de Roos, A.M. 2001. When is habitat assessment an advantage when foraging? Anim. Behav. 61: 1101-1112.
17. Ryer, C.H., Olla, B.L. 1996. Social behavior of juvenile chum salmon, Oncorhynchus keta, under risk of predation: the influence of food distribution. Environ. Biol. Fishes 45: 75-83.
18. Schoener, T.W. 1974. The compression hypothesis and temporal resource partitioning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71: 4169-4172.
19. Werner, E.E., Gilliam, J.F. 1984. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System. 15: 393-425.
20. Whitehouse, M.E.A. 1997. The benefits of stealing from a predator: foraging rates, predation risk, and intraspecific aggression in the kleptoparasitic spider Argyrodes antipodiana. Behav. Ecol. 8: 663-667.
21. Ziv, Y., Abramsky, Z., Kotler, B.P., Subach, A. 1993. Interference competition and temporal and habitat partitioning in two gerbil species. Oikos 66: 237-246.