Photopic and scotopic VEPs in patients with congenital stationary night-blindness

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 109, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 9-15

  Kubová, Zuzana ^a   Kremláček, Jan ^a   Kuba, Miroslav ^a   Chlubnová, Jana ^a   Svěrák, Jaromír ^a,b  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HRADEC KRALOVE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Congenital stationary night blindness; Motion onset VEPs; Pattern reversal VEPs; Scotopic VEPs

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; LUMINANCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOTION; NIGHT BLINDNESS; NIGHT VISION; PHOTOPIC VISION; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STANDARD; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

ADOLESCENT; DARK ADAPTATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; LIGHT; NIGHT BLINDNESS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RODS (RETINA); SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 10944228863     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-004-2435-8     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Y Myiake K Yagasaki M Horiguschi Y Kawase 1987 On- and off-responses in photopic electroretionogram in complete and incomplete types of congenital stationary night blindness. Jpn J Ophthalmol 31 81 7
2. Y Miyake M Horiguchi I Ota N Shiroyama 1987 Characteristic ERG-flicker anomaly in incomplete congenital stationary night blindness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 28 1816 1823
3. CS Barnes KR Alexander G Fishman 2002 A distinctive form of congenital stationary nightblindness with cone on-pathway dysfunction. Ophthalmology 109 575 583
4. G Benedek M Janáky N Adamkovich G Rubiczech G Sáry 1992 Scotopic pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials. Clin Vis Sci 8 47 54
5. G Benedek K Benedek S Keri T Letoha M Janáky 2003 Human scotopic spatiotemporal sensitivity: A comparison of psychophysical and electrophysiological data. Doc Ophthalmol 106 201 207
6. M Kuba Z Kubová 1992 Visual evoked potentials specific for motion-onset. Doc Ophthalmol 80 83 89
7. Hoffmann MB, Unsöld AS, Bach M. Directional tuning of human motion adaptation as reflected by the motion VEP. Vis Res 2001; 40: 2187-94
8. Visual sensitivity: Http://www.yorku.ca/eye/sensit.htm.
9. Wolf J, Arden G. Selective magnocellular damage in melanoma associated retinopathy: Comparison with congenital stationary nightblindness. Vision Res 1996; 36: 236-79
10. Odom V, Bach M, Barber C, Bridgell M, Marmor M, Tormene AP, Holder G, Vaeghan. Visual Evoked Potentials Standard (2004). www.iscev.org.
11. BR Cant AL Hume NA Shaw 1978 Effects of luminance on the pattern visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 45 496 504
12. Lith GHM van Vliet AGM van Dok-Mak van 1979 Value of pattern evoked potentials for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Doc Ophthalmol 46 345 351
13. HC Diener W Koch Dichgans 1982 The significance of luminance on visual evoked potentials in diagnosis of MS. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr 231 149 154
14. M Pop Y Payette E Santoriello 2002 Comparison of the pupil card and pupillometer in measuring pupil size. J Cataract Refractive Surg 28 283 288
15. BB Lee VC Smith J Pokorny J Kremrs 1997 Rod inputs in to macaque ganglion cells. Vision Res 37 2813 2828
16. H Sun J Pokorny VC Smith 2001 Rod-cone interactions assessed in inferred magnocellular and parvocellular postreceptoral pathways. J Vis 1 42 54
17. KR Gegenfurtner HM Mayser LT Sharpe 2000 Motion perception at scotopic light levels. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 17 1505 1515