Open access: A review of an emerging phenomenon

Serials Review

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 292-297

  Chesler, Adam ^a  

^a AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10944222914     PISSN: 00987913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Public Library of Science Web Site. http://www.plos.org/news/announce_wings.html .
2. Bettie Sue Masters and Judith S. Bond, “A Professional Society's Take on Access to the Scientific Literature.” http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/27.html .
3. Bill Kasdorf Keith Seitter October Ivins “Economics of Society Publishing: Through a Glass, Darkly” NASIG Conference presentation (Milwaukee, WI) 2004
4. Nicholas R. Cozzarelli Kenneth R. Fulton Diane M. Sullenberger Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101 5 2004 1111
5. Declan Butler “Britain Decides ‘Open Access’ Is Still an Open Issue” Nature 430 390 July 22, 2004 10.1038/430390b
6. SQW Limited, “Costs and Business Models in Scientific Research Publishing: A Report Commissioned by the Wellcome Trust.” April 2004, 2.
7. Carol Tenopir and Donald King, “An Evidence-Based Assessment of the ‘Author-Pays’ Model” Nature forum/open access debate. (2004), http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/26.html .
8. SQW Limited, “Costs and Business Models.”
9. Memorandum from the Publishers Association, UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee's Inquiry into Scientific Publications (July 7, 2004), http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/399we22.htm .
10. K. Satyanarayana “The Role of the Ombudsman in Biomedical Journals” Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 48 2002 292 296
11. Malakoff, “Opening the Books.”
12. SQW Limited, “Costs and Business Models,” 3.
13. Hawley, “Is Free Affordable?”
14. Tenopir and King, “An Evidence-Based Assessment.”
15. Lila Guterman “The Promise and Peril of ‘Open Access’” Chronicle of Higher Education 50 21 January 30, 2004 A10 A14
16. Tenopir and King, “An Evidence-Based Assessment.”
17. ACS Usage/Subscription Data (based on subscription revenues associated with electronic access and number of downloads of full text globally, January–August 2004).
18. James Testa and Marie E. McVeigh, “The Impact of Open Access Journals: A Citation Study from Thomson/ISI” The Thomson Company (2004), http://www.isinet.com/media/presentrep/acropdf/impact-oa-journals.pdf .
19. Julia King, “IOP Position Paper for the UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee's Inquiry into Scientific Publications, Appendix 74. (February 11, 2004), http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/399we92.htm .
20. EMBL/EMBO-sponsored meeting, “Science Publishing at the Crossroads,” Reported by Susan Owens. EMBO Reports 4, no.8 (June 7, 2003): 742, DOI 10.1038/sj.embor.embor913. http://www.nature.com/embor/journal/v4/n8/pdf/embor913.pdf .