Celebrating diversity in the communication field

Communication Studies

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 172-178

  Wood, Julia T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10944222439     PISSN: 10510974     EISSN: 17451035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10510979809368527     Document Type: Note

References (53)

1. Allen, B. J., 1995. “Diversity” and organizational communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23: 143-155.
2. Bingham, S., 1996. “ Sexual harassment on the job, on the campus ”. In Gendered relationships, Edited by: Wood, J. T., 233-252. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
3. Blair, C, Brown, J., and Baxter, L., 1994. Disciplining the feminine. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 80: 383-409.
4. Braithwaite, D., and Labrecque, D., 1994. Responding to the Americans with Disabilities Act: Contributions of interpersonal communication research and training. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22: 287-294.
5. Campbell, K. K., 1973. Women's liberation: An oxymoron. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59: 74-86.
6. Campbell, K. K., 1989a. Man cannot speak for her I: A critical study of early feminist speakers, Westport, CT: Praeger.
7. Campbell, K. K., 1989b. Man cannot speak for her II: Key texts of the early feminists, New York: Greenwood Press.
8. Campbell, K. K., 1991. Hearing women's voices. Communication Education, 40: 33-48.
9. Campbell, K. K., 1993. Women public speakers in the United States: A bio-critical sourcebook, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
10. Campbell, K. K., 1995a. Gender and genre: Loci of invention and contradiction in the earliest speeches by U. S. women. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 57: 479-495.
11. Campbell, K. K., 1995b. “ In silence we oppress ”. In Toward the 21st century: The future of speech communication, Edited by: Wood, J. T., and Gregg, R. B., 137-149. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
12. Davis, F., 1991. Moving the mountain: The women's movement in America since 1960, New York: Simon and Schuster.
13. Duck, S., and Wood, J. T., eds. 1995. Understanding relationship processes, 5: Confronting relationship challenges, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Eberly, D., 1994. Building a community of citizens, New York: University Press of America.
15. Frey, L., 1998. Special issue: Communication and social justice research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26
16. Gergen, K., 1991. The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary society, New York: Basic.
17. Haraway, D., 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Signs, 14: 575-599.
18. Harding, S., 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
19. Keller, E. F., 1985. Reflections on gender and science, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. Keyes, R., 1992. Do you have the time?. Parade, February 22: 22-25.
21. Lee, W., 1994. On not missing the boat: A processual method for inter/cultural understanding of idioms and life-world. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22: 141-161.
22. O'Sullivan, P., 1995. Computer networks and political participation: Santa Monica's teledemocracy project. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 25: 93-107.
23. Petronio, S., Reeder, H., Hecht, M., and Ros-Mendoza, T., 1996. Disclosure of sexual abuse by children and adolescence. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 24: 181-199.
24. Prusank, D. T., Duran, R. L., and DeLillo, D. A., 1993. Interpersonal relationships in women's magazines: Dating and relating in the 1970s and 1980s. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 70: 307-320.
25. Ray, E. B., ed. 1996. Case studies in communication and disenfranchisement: Applications to social health issues, Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Roiphe, K., 1993. The morning after: Sex, fear, and feminism, New York: Little Brown/Back Bay Books.
27. Rose, H., 1995. Apprehending Deaf culture. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23: 156-162.
28. Sabourin, T., 1995. The role of negative reciprocity in spouse abuse: A relational control analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23: 271-283.
29. Schmitz, J., Rogers, E., Phillips, K., and Pascal, D., 1995. The public electronic network (PEN) and the homeless in Santa Monica. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23: 26-43.
30. Seligman, M. E. P., 1990. Learned optimism, New York: Simon and Schuster.
31. Sommers, C. H., 1994. Who stole feminism?: How women have betrayed women, New York: Simon and Schuster.
32. Stamp, G., and Sabourin, T., 1995. Accounting for violence: An analysis of male spousal abuse narratives. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23: 284-307.
33. Shine, M. S., 1992. Understanding how things work: Sexual harassment and academic culture. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20: 391-400.
34. Surrey, J. L., 1983. “ The relational self in women: Clinical implications ”. In Women and empathy: Implications for psychological development and psychotherapy, Edited by: Jordan, J., Surrey, J., and Kaplan, A., 6-11. Wellesley, MA: Stone Center for Developmental Services and Studies.
35. Wander, P., 1983. The ideological turn in modem criticism. Central States Speech Journal, 34: 1-18.
36. Wander, P., 1993. Special issue: Ideology and communication. Western Journal of Communication, 57
37. Wander, P., and Jenkins, S., 1972. Rhetoric, society and the critical response. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58: 441-450.
38. West, J., 1993. Ethnography and ideology: The politics of cultural representation. Western Journal of Communication, 57: 209-214.
39. West, J., 1995. “ Understanding how dynamics of ideology influence violence between intimates ”. In Understanding relationship processes, 5: Confronting relationship challenges, Edited by: Duck, S., and Wood, J., 129-149. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Wolf, N., 1993. Fire with fire: The new female power and how to use it, New York: Fawcett Columbine.
41. Wood, J. T., 1986. Different voices in relationship crises: An extension of Gilligan's theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 25: 273-301.
42. Wood, J. T., 1993a. “ Engendered relations: Interaction, caring, power, and responsibility in intimacy ”. In Understanding relationship processes, 3: Social context and relationships, Edited by: Duck, S., 26-54. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43. Wood, J. T., 1993b. “ Enlarging conceptual boundaries: A critique of research on interpersonal communication ”. In Transforming visions: Feminist critiques in communication studies, Edited by: Bowen, S. P., and Wyatt, N. J., 19-49. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
44. Wood, J. T., 1994a. “ Gender and relationship crises: Contrasting reasons, responses, and relational orientations ”. In Queer words, queer images: The construction of homosexuality, Edited by: Ringer, J., 238-265. New York: New York University Press.
45. Wood, J. T., 1994b. Who cares?: Women, care, and culture, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
46. Wood, J. T., 1995a. Feminist scholarship and the study of personal and social relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12: 103-120.
47. Wood, J. T., 1995b. The part is not the whole: Studying diverse relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12: 563-569.
48. Wood, J. T., 1996a. Dominant and muted voices in popular representations of feminism. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 82: 171-185.
49. Wood, J. T., ed. 1996b. Gendered relationships, Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
50. Wood, J. T., 1998. But I thought you meant..: Misunderstandings in human communication, Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
51. Wood, J. T., and Cox, J. R., 1993. Rethinking critical voice: Materiality and situated knowledges. Western Journal of Communication, 57: 278-287.
52. Wood, J., and Duck, S., 1995a. “ Off the beaten track: New frontiers in relationship research ”. In Understanding relationship processes, 6: Off the beaten track: Understudied relationships, Edited by: Wood, J., and Duck, S., 1-21. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Wood, J., and Duck, S., eds. 1995b. Understanding relationship processes, 6: Off the beaten track: Understudied relationships, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.