Cai-Li communication protocol in noisy quantum channel

Chinese Physics Letters

Volumn 21, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 2340-2342

  Lü, Hua ^a   Yan, Xu Dong ^a   Zhang, Xian Zhou ^b  

^a Hubei Polytechnic University   (China)

^b HENAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY); QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

CALDERBANK-SHOR-STEANE CODES; COMMUNICATIONS PROTOCOLS; CORRECT ERROR; DETECTION PROBABILITIES; NOISY QUANTUM CHANNEL; PROTOCOL CANS; TIGHT BOUND;

QUANTUM COMMUNICATION;

EID: 10844269701     PISSN: 0256307X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0256-307X/21/12/006     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bennett C H and Brassard G 1984 Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India (New York: IEEE) p 175
2. Ekert A K 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 661
3. Bennett C H, Brassard G and Mermin N D 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 557
4. Bennett G H 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 3121
5. Bennett G H and Winsner S J 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 2881
6. Goldenberg L and Vaidman L 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 1239
7. Huttner B, Imoto N, Gisin N and Mor T 1995 Phys. Rev. A 51 1863
8. Koashi M and Imoto N 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 2383
9. Bruß D 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 3018
10. Hwang W Y, Koh I G and Han Y D 1998 Phys. Lett. A 244 489
11. Lo H K and Chau H F 1999 Science 283 2050
12. Cabell A 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 5635
13. Beige A, Englert B G, Kurtsiefer C and Weinfurter H 2002 Acta Phys. Pol. A 101 357
14. Boström K and Felbinger T 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 187902
15. Cai Q Y and Li B W 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 054301
16. Deng F G, Long G L and Liu X S 2003 Phys. Rev. A 68 042317
17. Cai Q Y and Li B W 2004 Chin. Phys. Lett. 21 601
18. Calderbank A R and Shor P W 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 1098 Steane A M 1996 Proc. R. Soc. London A 425 2551
19. Calderbank A R and Shor P W 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 1098 Steane A M 1996 Proc. R. Soc. London A 425 2551
20. Cai Q Y 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 109801
21. Nielsen M A and Chuang I L 2000 Quantum computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
22. It has been proven by Shannon when the Shannon rate 1 - 2H(δ) hits 0, the point at which the error rate is 11%, all the error can be corrected. One can also see this in Shor and Preskill J 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 441