A study of web usability for older adults seeking online health resources

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 387-406

  Becker, Shirley Ann ^a  

^a FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aging; Content accessibility; Health literacy; Older adults; User interfaces; Web design; Web download time; Web usability

Indexed keywords

AGING; CONTENT ACCESSIBILITY; HEALTH LITERACY; OLDER ADULTS; WEB DESIGN; WEB DOWNLOAD TIME; WEB USABILITY;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; USABILITY ENGINEERING; USER INTERFACES; WEBSITES;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 10844264627     PISSN: 10730516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1035575.1035578     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. ADMINISTRATION ON AGING. 2002. A profile of older Americans: 2002. Administration on Aging, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.aoa.gov/prof/Statistics/profile/2002profile.pdf.
2. AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS. 2002. Patient education in your practice: A handbook for the office setting, http://www.aafp.org/publications (Retrieved Dec. 16, 2003).
3. AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND. 2004. Normal changes in the aging eye. http://www.afb.org/Section.asp?SectionID=35&TopicID=212&SubTopicID=39 (Retrieved April 26, 2004).
4. BERKMAN, N. D., DEWALT, D. A., PIGNONE, M. P., SHERIDAN, S. L., LOHR, K. N, LUX, L. SUTTON, S. F., SWINSON, T., AND BONITO, A. J. 2004. Literacy and health outcomes, summary, evidence report. Technology Assessment 87. North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center, Publication No. 04-E007-1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Rockville, MD).
5. BERNARD, M., LIAO, C., AND MILLS, M. 2001. Determining the best online font for older adults. Usability News 3, 1. http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/3W/fontSR.htm (Retrieved Aug. 20, 2003).
6. CHADWICK-DIAS, A., MCNULTY, M., AND TULLIS, T. 2003. Web usability and age: How design changes can improve performance. 2003 Conference on Universal Usability, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 30-36.
7. CHAPARRO, A., BOHAN, M., FERNANDEZ, J. E., CHOI, S. D., AND KATTEL, B. 1999. The impact of age on computer input device use: Psychophysical and physiological measures. Int. J. Indust. Ergonomics 24, 503-513.
8. CHARNESS, N. 2001. Aging and communication: Human factors issues. In Communication, Technology, and Aging: Opportunities and Challenges for the Future, N. Charness, D. C. Park, and B. A. Sabel, Eds. Springer Publishing Co., New York, NY. 1-29.
9. CHARNESS, N. AND HOLLEY, P. 2001. Cognitive and perceptual constraints. In Human Factors Interventions for the Health Care of Older Adults, W. A. Rogers and A. D. Fisk, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Inc., Mahwah, NJ. 239-254.
10. CHISNELL, D., LEE, A., AND REDISH, J. 2004. Designing Web sites for older users: Comparing AARP's studies to earlier findings. Older, Wiser, Wired, http://www.aarp.org/olderwiserwired/oww-features/Articles/ a2004-03-03-comparison-studies.html (Retrieved April 30, 2004).
11. CRAIK, F. I. M. AND SALTHOUSE, T. A. 2000. The Handbook of Aging and Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Inc., Mahwah, NJ.
12. DAVIS, T. C., MICHIELUTTE, R. M., ASKOV, E. N., WILLIAMS, M. V., AND WEISS, B. D. 1998. Practical assessment of adult literacy in health care. Health Educ. Behav. 25, 613-624.
13. DOAK, C., DOAK, L., AND ROOT, J. 1996. Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills, 2nd Ed. J. B. Lippincott Co., Philadelphia, PA.
14. ECHT, K. V. 2002. Designing Web-based health information for older adults: Visual considerations and design directives. In Older Adults, Health Information, and the World Wide Web, R. W. Morrell, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Inc., Mahwah, NJ. 61-88.
15. ELLIS, R. D. AND KURNIAWAN, S. H. 2000. Increasing the usability of online information for older users: A case study in participatory design. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 12, 2, 263-276.
16. Fox, S. 2002. Wired seniors. Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/PIP-Wired_Seniors_Report.pdf (Retrieved Dec. 16, 2003).
17. Fox, S. AND FALLOWS, D. 2003. Internet health resources. Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=95 (Retrieved December 16, 2003).
18. Fox, S. 2004. Older Americans and the Internet. Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/PIP_Seniors_Online_2004.pdf (Retrieved April 28, 2004).
19. GAZMARARIAN, J., BAKER, D. W., WILLIAMS, M. V., PARKER, R. M., SCOTT, T. L., GREEN D. C., FEHRENBACH, S. N., REN, J., AND KOPLAN, J. P. 1999. Health literacy among medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 281, 545-551.
20. GREENSPAN, R. 2003. Your speed may vary. http://cyberatlas.internet.com/markets/broadband/article/0,10099_2196961,00. html#table1 (Retrieved Dec. 9, 2003).
21. HAWTHORNE, D. 2000. Possible implication of aging for interface designers. Interact. With Comput. 12, 5, 507-528.
22. HEALTHY PEOPLE 2001. 2000. Health Communication. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, http://www.healthypeople.gov/document/html/volume1/11healthcom.htm (Retrieved April 28, 2004).
23. HOLT, B. J. AND MORRELL, R. W. 2002. Guidelines for Web site design for older adults: The ultimate influence of cognitive factors. In Older Adults, Health Information, and the World Wide Web, R. W. Morrell, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 109-132.
24. KINCAID, J. P., FISHBURNE, R. P., ROGERS, R. L., AND CHISSOM, B. S. 1975. Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, Fog count and Flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Rep. 8-75, Naval Air Station, Memphis, TN.
25. KINCAID, J. P. AND MCDANIEL, W. C. 1974. An inexpensive automated way of calculating Flesch Reading Ease scores. Patient Disclosure Document 031350, US Patent Office, Washington, DC.
26. KINSELLA, K. AND VELKOFF, V. A. 2001. An aging world: 2001. International Population Reports, US Department of Health and Human Services, and US Department of Commerce. http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/p95-01-01.pdf.
27. KIRSCH, I., JUNGEBLUT, A., JENKINS, L., AND KOLSTAD, A. 1993. Adult literacy in America: A first look at the National Adult Literacy Survey. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
28. KOYANL, S. J., BALLEY, R. W., AND NALL J. R. 2004. Research-based Web design and usability guidelines. National Cancer Institute, http://usability.gov/pdfs/guidelines-book.pdf.
29. MEAD, S. E., BATSAKES, P. J., FISK, A. D., AND MYKITYSHYN, A. 1999. Application of cognitive theory to training and design solutions for age-related computer use. Int. J. Behav. Develop. 23, 553-573.
30. MEAD, S. E., SPAULDING, V. A., SIT, R. A., MEYER, B., AND WALKER, N. 1997. Effects of Age and training on World Wide Web navigation strategies. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA. 152-156.
31. MILLER, R. B. 1968. Response time in user-system conversational transactions. In Proceedings of the AFIPS Fall Joint Computer Conference 33, 267-277.
32. MORRELL, R. W., DAILEY, S. R., FELDMAN, C., MAYHORN, C. B., ECHT, K. V., HOLT, B. J., AND PODANY, K. I. 2004. Older adults and information technology: A compendium of scientific research and Web site accessibility guidelines. National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD.
33. NATIONAL WORK GROUP ON LITERACY AND HEALTH. 1998. Communicating with patients who have limited literacy skills. J. Family Prac. 46, 168-175.
34. NIA AND NLM. 2002. Making your Web site senior-friendly: A checklist. National Institute on Aging and National Library of Medicine, http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/checklist.pdf.
35. NIELSEN, J. 1996. Top ten mistakes in Web design. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9605.html (Retrieved December 13, 2003).
36. NIELSEN, J. 1999. Designing Web Usability: The Art of Simplicity. New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis, IN.
37. NIELSEN, J. AND COYNE P. K. 2002. Web usability for senior citizens: 46 Design guidelines based on usability studies with people age 65 and older. Nielsen Normal Group Report.
38. NIELSEN, J. AND TAHIR, M. 2002. Homepage usability: 50 Websites deconstructed. New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis, IN.
39. NIELSEN-BOHLMAN, L. PANZER, A. M., AND KINDIG, D. A. 2004. Health literacy a prescription to end confusion. Committee on Health Literacy, Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Science. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. The National Academies Press, Washington DC.
40. QUALLS, C. D., HARRIS, J. L., AND ROGERS, W. A. 2001. Cognitive-linguistic aging: Considerations for home health care environments. In Human Factors Interventions for the Health Care of Older Adults, W. A. Rogers and A. D. Fisk, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Inc., Mahwah, NJ. 47-68.
41. ROSE, G., KHOO, H., AND STRAUB, D. 1999. Current technological impediments to business-to-consumer electronic commerce. Commun. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 2, 1-74.
42. SALTHOUSE, T. A. 1991. Theoretical Perspectives on Cognitive Aging. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Inc., Mahwah, NJ.
43. SCHNEIDERMAN, B. 1984. Response time and display rate in human performance with computers. Comput. Surveys 16, 265-285.
44. SCHNEIDERMAN, B. 1998. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd Ed., Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.
45. SEIDLER, R. AND STELMACH, G. 1996. Motor control. Encyclopedia of Gerontology: Age, Aging, and the Aged. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA. 177-185.
46. SENIORNET, INC. 1998. Research on senior's computer and Internet usage. Commissioned by Charles Schwab and Co., Inc.
47. STRONG, A. J., WALKER, N., AND ROGERS, W. A. 2001. Searching the World Wide Web: Can older adults get what they need? In Human Factors Interventions for the Health Care of Older Adults, W. A. Rogers and A. D. Fisk, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Inc., Mahwah, NJ. 255-269.
48. TULLIS, T. S., BOYNTON, J. L., AND HERSH, H. 1995. Readability of fonts in the windows environment. In Proceedings of Computer Human Interactions (CHI) '95. Denver, CO. 127-128.
49. UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER. 1997. Patient Education Materials An Author's Guide. Office of Patient Education, University of Utah Health Sciences Center. http://www.med.utah.edu/pated/authors/literacy.html (Retrieved Dec. 15, 2003).
50. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. 1999. Americans in the information age - falling through the net. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99/contents.html (Retrieved Dec. 16, 2003).
51. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. 2002. A nation online. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn/index.html (Retrieved Dec. 16, 2003).
52. WALKER, N. MILLIANS, J., AND WORDEN, A. 1996. Mouse accelerations and performance of older computer users. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA. 151-154.
53. WESTERMAN, S. J., DAVIES, D. R., GLENDON, A. I., STAMMERS, R. B., AND MATTHEWS, G. 1995. Age and cognitive ability as predictors of computerized information retrieval. Behav. Inform. Technol. 14, 313-326.
54. WICKENS, C. D. AND HOLLAND, J. G. 1999. Engineering psychology and human performance, 3rd Ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
55. WORDEN, A., WALKER, N. BHARAT, K., AND HUDSON, S. 1997. Making computers easier for older adults to use: Area cursors and sticky icons. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Atlanta, GA. 266-271.
56. XIAO, B., LUNSFORD, R., COULSTON, R., WESSON, M., AND OVIATT, S. 2003. Modeling multimodal integration patterns and performance in seniors: Toward adaptive processing of individual differences. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces. Vancouver, B.C. 265-272.