Dynamic object individuation in rhesus macaques: A study of the tunnel effect

Psychological Science

Volumn 15, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 795-800

  Flombaum, Jonathan I ^a   Kundey, Shannon M ^a   Santos, Laurie R ^a   Scholl, Brian J ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; MACACA; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

ANIMALS; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONCEPT FORMATION; MACACA MULATTA; MOTION PERCEPTION; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 10844258203     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00758.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Assad, J.A., & Maunsell, J. (1995). Neural correlates of inferred motion in primate posterior parietal cortex. Nature, 373, 518-521.
2. Burke, L. (1952). On the tunnel effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 121-138.
3. Burt, P., & Sperling, G. (1981). Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. Psychological Review, 88, 171-195.
4. Carey, S., & Bassin, S. (1998, April). When adults fail to see the trick: Adult judgments of events in an infant violation of expectancy looking time study. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the International Society for Infant Studies. Atlanta, GA.
5. Carey, S., & Xu, F. (2001). Infants' knowledge of objects: Beyond object files and object tracking. Cognition, 80, 179-213.
6. Flombaum, J.I., & Scholl, B.J. (2004). A temporal same-object advantage for persisting objects: Change-detection studies of the 'tunnel effect.' Journal of Vision, 4(8), Abstract 730. Available http://journalofvision.org/4/8/730
7. Hauser, M.D. (2001). Searching for food in the wild: A nonhuman primate's expectations about invisible displacement. Developmental Science, 4, 84-93.
8. Hauser, M.D., Carey, S., & Hauser, L.B. (2000). Spontaneous number representation in semi-free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 267, 829-833.
9. Michotte, A., Thinès, G., & Crabbé, G. (1991). A modal completion of perceptual structures. In G. Thines, A. Costall, & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception (pp. 140-167). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (Original work published 1964)
10. Munakata, V., Santos, L.R., Spelke, E.S., Hauser, M.D., & O'Reilly, R.C. (2001). Visual representation in the wild: How rhesus monkeys parse objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 44-58.
11. Rawlins, R.G., & Kessler, M.J. (1987). The Cayo Santiago macaques: History, behavior, and biology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
12. Santos, L.R. (2004). 'Core knowledges': A dissociation between spatiotemporal knowledge and contact-mechanics in a non-human primate? Developmental Science, 7, 167-174.
13. Santos, L.R., Hauser, M.D., & Spelke, E.S. (2001). Recognition and categorization of biologically significant objects by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): The domain of food. Cognition, 82, 127-155.
14. Santos, L.R., Sulkowski, G.M., Spaepen, G.M., & Hauser, M.D. (2002). Object individuation using property/kind information in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Cognition, 83, 241-264.
15. Schecter, S., Hochstein, S., & Hillman, P. (1988). Shape similarity and distance disparity as apparent motion correspondence cues. Vision Research, 28, 1013-1021.
16. Scholl, B.J. (2001). Spatiotemporal priority and object identity. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 20, 359-371.
17. Scholl, B.J., & Leslie, A.M. (1999). Explaining the infant's object concept: Beyond the perception/cognition dichotomy. In E. Leopore & Z. Pylyshyn (Eds.), What is cognitive science? (pp. 26-73). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
18. Uller, C., Xu, F., Carey, S., & Hauser, M. (1997). Is language needed for constructing sortal concepts? A study with nonhuman primates. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 665-677). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
19. Wilcox, T. (1999). Object individuation: Infants' use of shape, size, pattern, and color. Cognition, 72, 125-166.
20. Wilcox, T., & Baillargeon, R. (1998). Object individuation in young infants: Further evidence with an event-monitoring paradigm. Developmental Science, 1, 127-142.
21. Wilcox, T., & Chapa, C. (2004). Priming infants to use color and pattern information in an individuation task. Cognition, 90, 265-302.
22. Xu, F., & Carey, S. (1996). Infants' metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 111-153.
23. Xu, F., & Carey, S. (2000). The emergence of kind concepts: A rejoinder to Needham & Baillargeon. Cognition, 74, 285-301.