What Rights are Eclipsed When Risk is Defined by Corporatism?: Governance and GM Food

Theory, Culture & Society

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 155-169

  Anderson, Paul Nicholas ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10844252934     PISSN: 02632764     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0263276404050460     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. ACRE (1993) The Regulation and Control of the Deliberate Release of Genetically Engineered Organisms. Department of the Environment/Advisory Committee on Releases into the Environment guidance note 1. London: DETR.
2. ACRE (1997) The Commercial Use of Genetically Modified Crops in the United Kingdom: the Potential Wider Impact on Farmland Wildlife. Discussion paper. Advisory Committee on Releases into the Environment. London: HMSO.
3. ACRE (1999) Genetically Modified Organisms and the Environment: Co-ordination of Government Policy. Advisory Committee on Releases into the Environment. London: HMSO/DEFRA.
4. ACRE (2000) Risk Assessment for Release and Marketing of GMOs in the European Union. Advisory Committee on Releases into the Environment. London: DEFRA.
5. Allaby, M. (1990) Living in the Greenhouse: a Global Warning. Wellingborough: Thorsons.
6. Anderson, P.N. (2000) Commodification, Conservation and Community: An Analysis and a Case Study in South India. Edinburgh Papers in South Asian Studies Series no. 14. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
7. Anderson, P.N. (2003) ‘Governance by Universal Justice or Serial Warfare?’, International Journal of Human Rights, 7(4): 143–154.
8. Beck, U. (1987) ‘The Anthropological Shock: Chernobyl and the Contours of the Risk Society’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32: 153–165.
9. Bryant, R. (2002) ‘Non-Governmental Organisations and Governmentality: “Consuming” Biodiversity and Indigenous People in the Philippines’, Political Studies, 50: 268–292.
10. Chomsky, N. (1992) Deterring Democracy. London: Vintage.
11. Chomsky, N. (2000) Rogue States: The Rule of Force in World Affairs. London: Pluto.
12. Cohen, N. (2003) ‘The GM Jeremiahs’, The Observer, 11 May.
13. Diamond, E. (2003) Science as Smokescreen? A Report on the Farm Scale Evaluation of GM Herbicide Tolerant Crops. London: Friends of the Earth.
14. Dibb, S. and S. Mayer (2000) Biotech – The Next Generation. Good for Whose Health? London: The Food Commission/Genewatch.
15. DOE (1995) A Guide to Risk Assessment and Risk Management for Environmental Protection. Department of the Environment. London: HMSO.
16. Ecologist (1998) ‘Call to Sack UK Biotech Advisors’, The Ecologist, 28(5): 285–285.
17. Economist (1998) ‘In Defence of the Demon Seed’, The Economist, 13 June.
18. Economist (1999) ‘Frankenstein Foods’, The Economist, 20 February.
19. Elliot, D. (1978) The Politics of Nuclear Power. London: Pluto.
20. Farish, W. (2003) ‘Biotech is Benign’, The Guardian, 4 June.
21. FoE (1998) GMOs: The Case for a Moratorium. London: Friends of the Earth.
22. FoE (2003a) ‘Genetically Modified Crops and Food’, Briefing paper. London: Friends of the Earth.
23. FoE (2003b) Earth Matters. London: Friends of the Earth, 56 (Autumn).
24. FSA (2003) Consumer Views of GM Food. London: Food Standards Agency.
25. GM-Free (1999) ‘GM Food: a Guide for the Confused’, GM-Free, 1(1): 8–12.
26. Greenpeace (2000) Food, the Environment and GMOs. Briefing paper. London: Greenpeace.
27. Greenpeace (2003) GM Farm Scale Trials. Briefing paper. London: Greenpeace.
28. Gorz, A. (1983) Ecology as Politics. London: Pluto.
29. Guardian (1999a) ‘Ousted Scientist and the Damning Research into Food Safety’, The Guardian, 12 February.
30. Guardian (1999b) ‘Blair Rules out Block on New Genetically Modified Crops’, The Guardian, 13 February.
31. Guardian (1999c) ‘Forests in Danger from GM Super-Tree Says WWF’, The Guardian, 10 November.
32. Guardian (2000) ‘Feed the World Opportunity Seen for GM Salmon’, The Guardian, 22 April.
33. Guardian (2002a) ‘Seeds of Change’, G2, The Guardian, 10 July.
34. Guardian (2002b) ‘Hi-Tech Crops Will Not Save Poor’, The Guardian, 25 November.
35. Guardian (2002c) ‘US Aid for Africa's Famines’, The Guardian, 13 December.
36. Guardian (2003a) ‘Case Not Proven’, The Guardian, 17 October.
37. Guardian (2003b) ‘Slow Germination of GM Crop Debate’, The Guardian, 11 February.
38. Guardian (2003c) ‘Majority Against GM Food’, The Guardian, 29 April.
39. Guardian (2003d) ‘Insurers Refuse to Cover GM Farmers’, The Guardian, 8 October.
40. Guardian (2003e) ‘Scientists Uncover Risks in GM Oil Seed Rape’, The Guardian, 14 October.
41. Guardian (2003f) ‘Debate on GM Crops “Bbeset by Confusion” ’, The Guardian, 25 November.
42. Guardian (2003g) ‘Report Warns of Risks Posed by GM Crops’, The Guardian, 26 November.
43. Guardian (2004a) ‘Scientists Clear GM Crop for Planting’, The Guardian, 14 January.
44. Guardian (2004b) ‘EU Lifts Six-Year Ban on GM Corn’, The Guardian, 15 May.
45. Guardian (2004c) ‘Gene Firm Pioneers Desert Crop’, The Guardian, 21 May.
46. Habermas, J. (1992[1962]) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity.
47. Hajer, M. (1997) The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
48. Hawken, P. (2003) ‘Politics of Sustainability’, Resurgence, 221: 14–15.
49. Higham, C. (1983) Trading with the Enemy: The Nazi-American Money Plot 1933–49. New York: Delacorte Press.
50. Ho, M-W. (1998) Genetic Engineering: Dream or Nightmare? Bath: Gateway.
51. Illich, I. (1978) The Right to Useful Unemployment. London: Marion Boyars.
52. Independent (2003) ‘The Risks of Genetically Modified Crops Still Outweigh the Benefits’, 17 October.
53. Independent on Sunday (1998) ‘Thus Does Cloning Make Cowards of Us All’, 13 December.
54. Independent on Sunday (2003) ‘Flaw in Crop Trials Destroy the Case for GM’, 12 October.
55. Ingersoll, D and R. Matthews (1991) The Philosophic Roots of Modern Ideology: Liberalism, Communism, Fascism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
56. Kimbrell, A. (1998) ‘Why Biotechnology and High-Tech Agriculture Cannot Feed the World’, The Ecologist, 28(5): 294–298.
57. Lawrence, F. (2001) ‘We Get CJD and Bile Duct Cancer So Others Get Rich’, The Guardian, 28 May.
58. May, R. (2002) ‘GM Food Could Be Good For You’, The Guardian, 29 November.
59. May, R. (2003) ‘GM Warriors Have Killed the Debate’, The Guardian, 25 November.
60. Mayer, S. (1998) Genetically Engineered Crops and Food: The Case for a Moratorium. Briefing Paper no. 4. London: Genewatch.
61. Meziani, G. and H. Warwick (2002) Seeds of Doubt. Bristol: Soil Association.
62. Monbiot, G. (2002) ‘The Covert Biotech War’, The Guardian, 19 November.
63. Monbiot, G. (2003) ‘Let's Do a Monsanto’, The Guardian, 10 June.
64. Mussolini, B. and G. Gentile (1932) ‘Doctrine of Fascism’, Enciclopedia Italiana.
65. New Scientist (1998a) ‘Strange Fruit’, New Scientist, 31 October.
66. New Scientist (1998b) ‘Chock-Full of Natural Nonsense’, New Scientist, 7 March.
67. New Scientist (1998c) ‘Greening the Desert’, New Scientist, 18 July.
68. New Scientist (1999) ‘The Name of the Game: The Battle Over Genetically Modified Food is Not What it Seems’, New Scientist, 22 May.
69. New Scientist (2000) ‘Two Cheers for Montreal’, New Scientist, 5 February.
70. New Scientist (2004) ‘Argentina's Bitter Harvest’, New Scientist, 17 April.
71. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (1999) Genetically Modified Crops: The Ethical and Social Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
72. Observer (2001) ‘Fury at Plan to Sell off DNA Secrets’, The Observer, 23 September.
73. Observer (2004) ‘Minister Broke Cabinet Rule Over Business’, The Observer, 22 February.
74. O'Neill, J. (1997) ‘Managing Without Prices: The Monetary Valuation of Biodiversity’, Ambio, 26(8): 546–550.
75. Pearce, F. (2004) ‘Gene Pollution is Pervasive’, New Scientist, 28 February.
76. Penz, P. (1998) ‘Environmental Victims and State Sovereignty: A Normative Analysis’, pp. 27–47 in C. Williams (ed.) Environmental Victims: New Risks, New Injustice. London: Earthscan.
77. Radio 4 News (2004) ‘Government to Back GM crops’, 19 February (also available on the BBC News website: http://www.news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3501669.stm/).
78. The Royal Society (2002) Genetically Modified Plants for Food Use and Human Health – an Update. London: The Royal Society.
79. Sen, A. (1982) Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
80. Shiva, V. (1993) Monoculture of the Mind. Penang: Third World Network.
81. Shiva, V. (2000) ‘Poverty and Globalisation’, Reith Lecture (no. 5), 12 May, URL: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/events/reith_2000/lecture5.stm
82. Soil Association (2003) ‘Genetic Engineering – The Key Issues’. Briefing paper. Bristol: Soil Association.
83. The Times (2000) ‘Allow GM Crops to Feed Poor, Says Top Scientists’, The Times, 12 July.
84. The Times (2002) ‘Seeds of Doubt’, The Times, 17 August.
85. The Times (2003) ‘Trade Rows Loom Over GM Export Treaty’, The Times, 28 May.
86. Westbrook, R. (1991) John Dewey and American Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
87. Williams, C. (ed.) (1998) Environmental Victims: New Risks, New Injustice. London: Earthscan.
88. Wolpert, L. (1996) ‘In Praise of Science’, pp. 9–21 in R. Levinson and J. Thomas (eds) Science Today: Problem or Crisis? London: Routledge.
89. WTO (2003) Industrial Tariff Liberalisation and the Doha Development Agenda. WTO discussion paper no. 1, Geneva: World Trade Organisation Secretariat.