Two-dimensional anisotropic Cartesian mesh adaptation for the compressible Euler equations

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 46, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 1099-1125

  Keats, W Andrew ^a   Lien, F S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Anisotropic mesh; Cartesian geometry; Euler equations; Shock waves; Transient adaptation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ANISOTROPY; COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA STRUCTURES; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; LAMINAR FLOW; SHOCK WAVES;

CARTESIAN MESH ADAPTATION; COMPUTATIONAL SAVINGS; ISOTROPIC MESH; SMEARING;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; EULER FLOW;

EID: 10844251173     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.780     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Leveque RJ. Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2002.
2. De Zeeuw D, Powell KG. An adaptively refined Cartesian mesh solver for the Euler equations. Journal of Computational Physics 1993; 104 56-68.
3. Sun M. Numerical and experimental studies of shock wave interaction with bodies. Ph.D. Thesis, Tohoku University, 1998.
4. Ham F, Lien FS, Strong AB. A Cartesian grid method with transient anisotropic adaptation. Journal of Computational Physics 2002; 179:469-494.
5. Wu Z-N, Li K. Anisotropic Cartesian grid method for steady inviscid shocked flow computation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2003; 41:1053-1084.
6. Laney CB. Computational Gasdynamics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1998.
7. +. Journal of Computational Physics 1996; 129:364-382.
8. Liou M-S, Steffen CJ. A new flux splitting scheme. Journal of Computational Physics 1993; 107:23-29.
9. Meinke M, Schröder W, Krause E, Rister Th. A comparison of second- and sixth-order methods for large-eddy simulations. Computers and Fluids 2001; 31:695-718.
10. Ripley RC. Unstructured-grid methods for numerical simulation of shock wave interactions with bodies and boundary layers. Master's Thesis University of Waterloo, 2002.
11. Larsson NJ. Computational aero acoustics for vehicle applications. Licentiate Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, 2002.
12. Toro EF. Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer: Berlin, 1999.
13. Lee RC, Tepfenhart WM. UML and C++: A Practical Guide to Object-Oriented Software Development. Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, 1997.
14. Lien F-S. A pressure-based unstructured-grid method for all-speed flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2000; 33 355-374.
15. Nocedal J, Wright SJ. Numerical Optimization: Springer: New York, 1999.
16. Skews BW. The perturbed region behind a diffracting shock wave. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1967; 29(4):705-719.
17. Bazhenova TV, Gvozdeva LG, Nettleton MA. Unsteady interactions of shock waves. Progress in Aerospace Science 1984; 21:249-331.
18. Hillier R. Computation of shock wave diffraction at a ninety degrees convex edge. Shock Waves 1991; 1:89-98.
19. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. v. a second-order sequel to Godunov's method. Journal of Computational Physics 1979; 32:101-136.
20. Woodward P, Colella P. The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. Journal of Computational Physics 1984; 54:115-173.