Industry-public knowledge infrastructure interaction: Intra- and inter-organizational explanations of interactive learning

Industry and Innovation

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 327-352

  Meeus, Marius T H ^a   Oerleamans, Leon A G ^b   Hage, Jerald ^c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFRASTRUCTURE; INNOVATION; LEARNING; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 10844220875     PISSN: 13662716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1366271042000289342     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Aiken, M. and Hage, J. 1968: Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure, American Sociological Review, 33: 912-929.
2. Alter, C. and Hage, J. 1993: Organizations Working Together. Newbury Park: Sage.
3. Anderson, P and Tushman, M.L. 1990: Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 604-633.
4. Baldwin, WL. and Scott, J.T 1987: Market Structure and Technological Change. London: Harwood Academic.
5. Barney, J. 1991: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management Studies, 17: 99-120.
6. Chung, S., Singh, H. and Lee, K. 2000: Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation, Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1-22.
7. Cohen, WM. and Levin, R.C. 1989: Empirical studies of innovation and market structure, in R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig (eds) Handbook of Industrial Organisation, pp. 1060-1170. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
8. Cohen, WM. and Levinthal, D.A. 1990: Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152.
9. Cohen, W., Florida, R., Randazzese, L. and Walsh, J. 1998: Industry and the academy: uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance, in R. Noll (ed.) Challenges to Research Universities, pp. 171-200. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
10. Cohendet, P, Héraud, J.A.A. and Zuscovitch, E. 1993: Technological learning, economic networks and innovation appropriability, in D. Foray and C. Freeman (eds) Technology and the Wealth of Nations. The Dynamics of Constructed Advantage, pp. 66-76. London: Pinter.
11. Combs, J.G. and Ketchen, D.J., Jr. 1999: Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 867-888.
12. Cooke, P, Boekholt, P and Tbdtling, E (eds) 2000: The Governance of Innovation in Europe. Regional Perspectives on Global Competitiveness. London: Pinter.
13. Dewar, R. and Ilage, J. 1978: Size, technology, complexity and structural differentiation: toward a theoretical synthesis, Administrative Science Quarterly, 23: 111-136.
14. Dodgson, M. 1993: Organizational learning: a review of some literatures, Organization Studies, 14: 375-394.
15. Dougherty, D. 1992: Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms, Organization Science, 3: 179-202.
16. Duncan, R.B. 1972: Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty, Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 313-327.
17. Edquist, C. (ed.) 1997: Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter.
18. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. 2000: The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, 29: 109-123.
19. Evan, W. 1993: Organization Theory. Research and Design. New York: Maxwell Macmillan.
20. Fombrun, C. 1996: Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
21. Freeman, C. and Soete, L. 1997: The Economics of Innovation. London: Pinter.
22. Galaskiewicz, J. 1985: Interorganizational relations, Annual Review of Sociology, 11: 281-304.
23. Galli, R. and Teubal, M. 1997: Paradigmatic shifts in national innovation systems, in C. Edquist (ed.) Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, pp. 343-370. London: Pinter.
24. Gambardella, A. 1992: Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: the U.S. pharmaceutical industry in the 1980's, Research Policy, 21: 391-407.
25. Geisler, E. 1995: Industry-university technology cooperation: a theory of inter-organizational relationships, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 7: 217-229.
26. Gibbons, M. 2003: A new mode of knowledge production, in R. Rutten, E Boekema and E. Kuijpers (eds) Economic Geography of Higher Education: Knowledge, Infrastructure and Learning Regions, pp. 229-243. London: Routledge.
27. Grandori, A. 1997: An organizational assessment of interfirm coordination modes, Organization Studies, 18: 897-925.
28. Grant, R. 1996: Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration, Organization Science, 7: 375-387.
29. Gulati, R. 1995: Social structure and alliance formation: a longitudinal analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 619-652.
30. Hage, J. and Alter, C. 1997: A typology of interorganizational relationships and networks, in J.R. Hollingsworth and R. Boyer (eds) Contemporary Capitalism. The Embeddedness of Institutions, pp. 94-126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Håkansson, H. 1987: Industrial Technological Development: A Network Approach. London: Croom Helm.
32. Håkansson, H. 1989: Corporate Technological Behavior: Co-operation and Networks. London: Routlegde.
33. Henderson, R.M. and Clark, K.B. 1989: Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing products and the failure of established firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 9-30.
34. Huber, G.P. 1991: Organizational learning; the contributing process and the literatures, Organizational Science, 2: 88-115.
35. Jin, D.J. and Stough, R.R. 1998: Learning and learning capability in the Fordist and post-Fordist age: an integrative framework, Environment and Planning A, 30: 1255-1278.
36. Jones, C., Hesterly, W.S. and Borgatti, S.P. 1997: A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and social mechanisms, Academy of Management Review, 22: 911-945.
37. Kleinknecht, A. and Reijen, J.O.N. 1992: Why do firms cooperate on R& D? An empirical study, Research Policy, 21: 347-360.
38. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. 1992: Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology, Organization Science 3: 383-397.
39. Lam, A. 1997: Embedded firms, embedded knowledge: problems of collaboration and knowledge transfer in global cooperative ventures, Organization Studies, 18: 973-996.
40. Lawrence, PR. and Lorsch, J.W. 1967: Organization and Environmen: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration.
41. Leonard-Barton, D. and Doyle, J.L. 1996: Commercializing technology: imaginative understanding of user needs, in R.S. Rosenbloom and W.J. Spencer (eds) Engines of Innovation. US. Industrial Research at the End of the Era, pp. 177-208. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
42. Lundvall, B.Å. 1985: Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
43. Lundvall, B.Å. 1988: Innovation as an interactive process, in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds) Technical Change and Economic Theory, pp. 349-369. London: Pinter.
44. Lundvall, B.Å. 1992: User-producer relationships, national systems of innovations and internationalisation, in D. Foray and C. Freeman (eds) Technology and the Wealth of Nations. The Dynamics of Constructed Advantage, pp. 277-300. London: Pinter.
45. Lundvall, B.Å. 1993: User-producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalization, in B.A. Lundvall (ed.) National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, pp. 45-67. London: Pinter.
46. Meeus, M.T.H. and Oerlemans, L.A.G. 1993: Economic network research: a methodological state of the art, in P Beije and O. Nuys (eds) Networking in Dutch Industries, pp. 37-68. Leuven/Apeldoorn: Garant.
47. Meeus, M.T.H. and Oerlemans, L.A.G. 1995: The competitiveness of firms in the region of North-Brabant, in P Beije and O. Nuys (eds) The Dutch Diamond? The Usefulness of Porter in Analyzing Small Countries. Leuven/Apeldoorn: Garant.
48. Meeus, M.T.H., Oerlemans, L.A.G. and Boekema, F.W.M. 1996: Knowledge indicators and innovative performance (in Dutch), in O. Atzema and J. van Dijk (eds) Technology and the Regional Labour Market, pp. 144-161. Assen: Van Gorcum.
49. Midgley, D.E, Morrison, PD. and Roberts, J.H. 1992: The effects of networks structure in industrial diffusion processes, Research Policy 21: 533-552.
50. Miller, D. and Chen, M.J. 1994: Sources and consequences of competitive inertia. A study of the U.S. airline industry, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 1-23.
51. Miller, D. and Friesen, P.H. 1982: Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: two models of strategic momentum, Strategic Management Journal, 3: 1-25.
52. Mowery, D.C., Oxley, J.E. and Silverman, B.S. 1996: Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer, Strategic Management Journal, 17: 77-91.
53. Nelson, R. 1982: The role of knowledge in R&D efficiency, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97: 453-470.
54. Oerlemans, L.A.G. 1996: The Embedded Firm: Innovation in Industrial Networks (in Dutch). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
55. Oerlemans, L.A.G., Meeus, M.T.H. and Boekema, F.W.M. 1998: Do networks matter for innovation, Journal of Social and Economic Geography, 3: 298-309.
56. Oliver, A.L. and Ebers, M. 1998: Networking network studies: an analysis of conceptual configurations in the study of inter-organizational relationships, Organization Studies, 19: 549-583.
57. Panne, G. van der and Kleinknecht, A.H. 2003: Van Stanford naar Zandvoort, Economische Statistische Berichten, 236-238.
58. Pavitt, K. 1984: Sectoral patterns of technical change. Towards a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy, 13: 343-373.
59. Pfeffer, J. and Salançik, G.R. 1978: The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Basic Books.
60. Pisano, G.P. 1989: The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 153-176.
61. Rosenbloom, R.S. and Christensen, C.M. 1998: Technological discontinuities, organizational capabilities, and strategic commitments, in G. Dosi, D.J. Teece and J. Chytry (eds.), Technology, Organization, and Competitiveness. Perspectives on Industrial and Corporate Change, pp. 215-247. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. Sakakibara, M. 2001: Cooperative research and development: who participates and in which industries do projects take place, Research Policy, 30: 993-1009.
63. Sakakibara, M. 2002: Formation of R&D consortia: industry and company effects, Strategic Management Journal, 23: 1033-1047.
64. Santoro, M. and Chakrabarti, A. 2002: Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interaction, Research Policy, 31: 1163-1180.
65. Saxenian, A. 1994: Regional Advantage. Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Schumpeter, J. 1975: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 3rd edn. New York: Harper & Row (originally published in 1942).
67. Senker, J. and Faulkner, W. 1996: Networks, tacit knowledge and innovation, in R. Coombs, A. Richards, P.P. Saviotti and V. Walsh (eds) Technological Collaboration: The Dynamics of Cooperation in Industrial Innovation, pp. 76-97. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
68. Smith, K. 1995: Interactions in knowledge systems: foundations, policy implications and empirical methods, STI Review, 16: 69-102.
69. Szulanski, G. 1996: Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17: 27-43.
70. Teece, D. and Pisano, G.P. 1998: The dynamic capabilities of firms, in G. Dosi, D.J. Teece and J. Chytry (eds) Technology, Organization, and Competitiveness. Perspectives on Industrial and Corporate Change, pp. 193-212. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71. Teubal, M. 1976: On user needs and need determination: aspects of the theory of technological innovation, Research Policy, 5: 266-289.
72. Turner, J. 1988: A Theory of Social Interaction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
73. Tushman, M.L. and Anderson, P. 1986: Technological discontinuities and organizational environments, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 439-465.
74. Tushman, M.L. and Romanelli, E. 1985: Organizational evolution, in L.L. Cummings and B.S. Staw (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior. An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, Vol. 7, pp. 171-222. Greenwich: JAI Press.
75. Vermeulen, M. 2003: Knowledge still travels of foot: an educationalist's perspective on regional development, in R. Rutten, F. Boekema and E. Kuijpers (eds) Economic Geography of Higher Education: Knowledge, Infrastructure and Learning Regions, pp. 69-86. London: Routledge.
76. Von Hippel, E. 1976: The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process, Research Policy, 5: 212-239.
77. Von Hippel, E. 1987: Cooperation between rivals: informal know-how trading, Research Policy, 16: 291-302.
78. Vossen, R.W. and Nooteboom, B. 1996: Firm size and participation in R&D, in A.H. Kleinknecht (ed.) Determinants of Innovation. The Message from New Indicators, pp. 155-168. London: Macmillan.
79. Wernerfelt, B. 1984: A resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5: 171-180.
80. Windrum, P. 1999: Simulation models of technological innovation, American Behavioral Scientist, 42: 1531-1550.