Dynamic optimization of the Tennessee Eastman process using the OptControlCentre

Computers and Chemical Engineering

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 1513-1531

  Jockenhövel, Tobias ^a   Biegler, Lorenz T ^b   Wächter, Andreas ^c  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c IBM T J WATSON RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

NLP solvers; NMPC; On line optimization; Real time optimization; RTO; SQP

Indexed keywords

ALGEBRA; NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING; OPTIMIZATION; OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES;

PHASER REACTORS;

REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

CONTROL;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DYNAMICS; MODEL; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; ONLINE SYSTEM; PRESSURE; PROBLEM SOLVING; REACTOR; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 10744228203     PISSN: 00981354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0098-1354(03)00113-3     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Albuquerque, J., Gopal, V., Staus, G., Biegler, L. T., & Ydstie, B. E. (1999). Interior point SQP strategies for large-scale, structured process optimization problems. Computers and Chemical Engineering 23 (4-5), 543-554.
2. Aspen Technology (2002). Aspen custom modeler user's guide. http:// www.aspentech.com.
3. Bausa, J. (2000). Dynamische Optimierung energie- und verfahrenstechnischer Prozesse, Ph.D. thesis, Germany: Technical University of Berlin.
4. Betts, J. T. (2001). Practical methods for optimal control using nonlinear programming. Advances in design and control 3. Philadelphia, USA: SIAM.
5. Biegler, L. T. (2000). Efficient solution of dynamic optimization and NMPC problems. In F. Allgoewer & A. Zheng (Eds.), Nonlinear model predictive control (pp. 219-245). Basel: Birkhacuser.
6. Biegler, L. T., Cervantes, A. M., & Wächter, A. (2002). Advances in simultaneous strategies for dynamic process optimization. Chemical Engineering and Science 57 (4), 575-593.
7. Binder, T., Blank, L., Bock, H. G., Bulitsch, R., Dahmen, W., Diehl, M., Kronseder, T., Marquardt, W., Schloeder, J., & von Stryk, O. (2001). Introduction to model based optimization of chemical processes on moving horizons. In M. Groetschel, S. O. Krumke & J. Rambau (Eds.), Online optimization of large scale systems. Berlin: Springer.
8. Cervantes, A. M., Wächter, A., Tütüncü, R. H., & Biegler, L. T. (2000). A reduced space interior point strategy for optimization of differential algebraic systems. Computers and Chemical Engineering 24 (1), 39-51.
9. Diehl, M., Findeisen, R., Nagy, Z., Bock, H. G., Schlöder, J. P, & Allgöwer, F. (2002). Real-time optimization and nonlinear model predictive control of processes governed by differential-algebraic equations. Journal of Process Control 12 (4), 557.
10. Downs, J. J., & Vogel, E. F. (1993). A plant-wide industrial process control problem. Computers and Chemical Engineering 17 (3), 245-255.
11. Duvall, P. M., & Riggs, J. B. (2000). Online optimization of the Tennessee Eastman challenge problem. Journal of Process Control 10 (1), 19-33.
12. Feller, R. (1997). Nonlinear model predictive control of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process. Student Senior Project. Carnegic Mellon University, USA.
13. Gill, P. E., Murray W., & Saunders, M. A. (1998). User's guide for SNOPT: a FORTRAN package for large-scale nonlinear programming. Technical report, San Diego, USA: Department of Mathematics, University of California.
14. Groetschel, M., Krumke, S. O. & Rambau, J. (Eds.), Online optimization of large scale systems (2001). Berlin: Springer.
15. Jockenhövel, T. (2002). OPTCONTROLCENTRE, software package for dynamic optimization. http://www.OptControlCentre.com/.
16. Jockenhövel, T. (2003). Ph.D. thesis. Germany: Technical University of Berlin, in press.
17. Larsson, T., & Skogestad, S. (2000). Plantwide control: a review and a new design procedure. Modeling, Identification and Control 21, 209-240.
18. Larsson, T., Hestetun, K., Hovland, E., & Skogestad, S. (2001). Self-optimizing control of a large-scale plant: the Tennessee Eastman process. Industrial Engineering and Chemical Research 40 (22), 4889-4901.
19. Leineweber D. B., Bock, H. G., Schlöder, J. P., Gallitzendö rfer, J. V., Schäfer, A., & Jansohn, P. (1997). A boundary value problem approach to the optimization of chemical processes described by DAE models. IWR Preprint 97-14, Universität Heidelberg. Computers and Chemical Engineering, submitted for publication.
20. Mayne, D. Q., Rawlings, J. B., Rao, C. V., & Scokaert, P. (2000). Constrained model predictive control: stability and optimality. Automatica 36 (6), 789-814.
21. McAvoy, T. J., & Ye, N. (1994). Base control for the Tennessee Eastman problem. Chemical Engineering 18 (5), 383-413.
22. Process Systems Enterprises Limited (2002). gProms user's guide. http://www.psenterprise.com/.
23. Ricker, N. L. (1995). Optimal steady state operation of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process. Computers and Chemical Engineering 19 (9), 949-959.
24. Ricker, N. L., & Lee, J. H. (1995a). Nonlinear model predictive control of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process. Computers and Chemical Engineering 19 (9), 961-981.
25. Ricker, N. L., & Lee, J. H. (1995b). Nonlinear modeling and state estimation for the Tennessee Eastman challenge process. Computers and Chemical Engineering 19 (9), 983-1005.
26. Schittkowski, K. (1987). More test examples for nonlinear programming codes. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems # 282. Berlin: Springer.
27. Vassiliadis, V. R., Sargent, W. H., & Pantelides, C. (1994). Solution of a class of multistage dynamic optimization problems. 2. Problems with path constraints. Industrial Engineering and Chemical Research 33 (9), 2123-2133.
28. Wächter, A. (2002). An interior point algorithm for large-scale nonlinear optimization with applications in process engineering. Ph.D. Thesis, USA: Carnegie Mellon University (IPOPT and documentation are available from http://www.coin-or.org).
29. Yan, M., & Ricker, N. L. (1997). On-line optimization of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process. In: Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 97CH36041). Evanston, IL, USA: American Autom. Control Council, vol. 6 p. (2960-5 vol. 5) Part No: vol. 5.
30. Zheng, A., & Zhang, W. (2001). Computationally efficient nonlinear model predictive control algorithm for control of constrained nonlinear systems. xiv+261, 173-87. In B. Kouvaritakis & M. Cannon (Eds.), Nonlinear predictive control theory and practice. London, UK: IEE.