Comment on 'Midwifery is not a fit occupation for a Gentleman' [1]

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 201-

  Reiss, H ^a  

^a Windy Ridge   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CESAREAN SECTION; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; HUMAN; LETTER; MIDWIFE; OCCUPATION; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURVIVAL; TWINS;

CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HISTORY, 16TH CENTURY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDWIFERY; PREGNANCY; PREJUDICE; RARE BOOKS; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 10744226432     PISSN: 01443615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01443610410001663767     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. King G. (1954) Advanced extrauterine pregnancy (Joseph Price Oration). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 67, 712-740.
2. Nicopoullos J.D.M. (2003) 'Midwifery is not a fit occupation for a Gentleman'. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 23, 589-593.
3. Reiss H. (2003) Abdominal delivery in the 16th century. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96, 370.
4. Reiss H.E. (2000) John William Ballantyne 1861-1923. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 20, 343-346.