Indicators of inflammation in the diagnosis of mastitis

Veterinary Research

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 565-578

  Pyörälä, Satu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Electrical conductivity; Indicators of inflammation; Mastitis; NAGase; Somatic cells count

Indexed keywords

ACUTE PHASE PROTEIN; AMYLOID A PROTEIN; ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; HAPTOGLOBIN; LACTOSE; N ACETYL BETA GLUCOSAMINIDASE;

ANIMAL FOOD; AUTOMATION; BACTERIOLOGY; CATTLE DISEASE; CELL COUNT; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); DAIRY CATTLE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FOOD QUALITY; HEALTH HAZARD; INFLAMMATION; MILK; NONHUMAN; ONLINE SYSTEM; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SOMATIC CELL;

ACETYLGLUCOSAMINIDASE; ACUTE-PHASE PROTEINS; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CELL COUNT; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; FEMALE; MASTITIS, BOVINE; MILK;

ANIMALIA; BOS TAURUS;

EID: 10744224830     PISSN: 09284249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/vetres:2003026     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Ball H.J., Greer D., N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase test for screening milk samples for subclinical mastitis, Vet. Rec. 129 (1991) 507-509.
2. Barkema H.W., Deluyker H.A., Schukken Y.H., Lam T.J.G.M., Quarter-milk somatic cell count at calving and at the first six milkings after calving, Prev. Vet. Med. 38 (1999) 1-9.
3. Berning L.M., Shook G.E., Prediction of mastitis using milk somatic cell count, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase, and lactose, J. Dairy Sci. 75 (1992) 1840-1848.
4. Boosman R., Niewold Th.A., Mutsaers C.W.A.A.M., Gruys E., Serum amyloid A concentrations in cows given endotoxin as acute-phase stimulant, Am. J. Vet. Res. 50 (1989) 1690-1694.
5. Brolund L., Cell counts in bovine milk: causes of variation and applicability for diagnosis of subclinical mastitis, Acta Vet. Scand. 80 Suppl. (1985) 1-123.
6. de Mol R.M., Ouweltjes W., Detection model for mastitis in cows milked in an automatic milking system, Prev. Vet. Med. 49 (2001) 71-82.
7. Detilleux J., Arendt J., Lomba F., Leroy P., Methods for estimating areas under receiver-operating characteristic curves: illustration with somatic-cell scores in subclinical intramammary infections, Prev. Vet. Med. 41 (1999) 75-88.
8. Djabri B., Bareille N., Beaudeau F., Seegers H., Quarter milk somatic cell count in infected dairy cows: a meta-analysis, Vet. Res. 33 (2002) 335-357.
9. Dohoo I.R., Setting SCC cutpoints for cow and herd interpretation, in: 40th Annual Meeting of National Mastitis Council, Reno, USA, February 11-14, 2001, pp. 10-18.
10. Dohoo I.R., Leslie K.E., Evaluation of changes in somatic cell counts as indicators of new intramammary infections, Prev. Vet. Med. 10 (1991) 225-237.
11. Eckersall P.D., Conner J.G., Bovine and canine acute phase proteins, Vet. Res. Commun. 12 (1988) 169-178.
12. Eckersall P., Young F.J., Mc Comb C., Hogarth C.J., Safi S., Weber A., McDonald T., Nolan A.M., Fitzpatrick J.L., Acute phase proteins in serum and milk from dairy cows with clinical mastitis, Vet. Rec. 148 (2001) 35-41.
13. Emanuelson U., Olsson T., Mattila T., Åström G., Holmberg O., Effects of parity and stage of lactation on adenosine triphosphate, somatic cell count and antitrypsin content in cow's milk, J. Dairy Res. 55 (1988) 49-55.
14. Finger R., Sischo W.M., Bioluminescence as a technique to evaluate udder preparation, J. Dairy Sci. 84 (2001) 818-823.
15. Giesecke W.H., Viljoen M.H., The diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in lactating cows: a comparison of cytological methods and a monovalent radial immunodiffusion test, Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 41 (1974) 51-74.
16. Greiner M., Gardner I.A., Epidemiological issues in the validation of veterinary diagnostic tests, Prev. Vet. Med. 45 (2000) 3-22.
17. Greiner M., Pfeiffer D., Smith R.D., Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristics analysis for diagnostic tests, Prev. Vet. Med. 45 (2000) 23-41.
18. Hamann J., Changes in milk somatic cell count with regard to the milking process and the milking frequency - preliminary report, IDF Mastitis Newsletter 24 (2001) 5-6.
19. Hamann J., Milk quality and udder health in relation to modern milking, in: Recent developments and perspectives in bovine medicine, XXII World Buiatrics Congress, Hannover, August 18-23, 2002, pp. 334-345.
20. Hamann J., Krömker V., Potential of specific milk composition variables for cow health management, Livest. Prod. Sci. 48 (1997) 201-208.
21. Hamann J., Zecconi A., Evaluation of the electrical conductivity of milk as a mastitis indicator, in: IDF bulletin 334, International Dairy Federation, Brussels, Belgium, 1998.
22. Hamann J., Kruger M., Kretschmar M., Nipp B., Gyodi P., C-reactive protein in milk of healthy and subclinically diseased bovine udder quarters, Milchwissenschaft 52 (1997) 546-550.
23. Hillerton J.E., Redefining mastitis based on somatic cell count, IDF Bulletin 345 (1999) 4-6.
24. Hillerton J.E., Semmens J.E., Comparison of treatment of mastitis by oxytocin or antibiotics following detection according to changes in milk electrical conductivity prior to visible signs, J. Dairy Sci. 82 (1999) 93-96.
25. Hirvonen J., Eklund K., Teppo A.M., Huszenicza. G., Kulcsar M., Saloniemi H., Pyörälä S., Acute phase response in dairy cows with experimentally induced Escherichia coli mastitis, Acta Vet. Scand. 40 (1999) 35-46.
26. Hogeveen H., Miltenburg J.D., den Hollander S., Frankena K., Milking three times a day and its effect on udder health and production, IDF Mastitis Newsletter 24 (2001) 7.
27. Hovinen M., Kasanen I., Pyörälä S., Monitoring of udder health in automatic milking, in: First American Conference on Robotic milking, Toronto, Canada, 2002, pp. 71-74.
28. International Dairy Federation, A monograph of bovine mastitis, 1971.
29. Jensen N.E., Knudsen K., Inter-quarter comparison of markers of subclinical mastitis: somatic cell count, electrical conductivity, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase and antirypsin, J. Dairy Res. 58 (1991) 389-399.
30. Kaartinen L., Sandholm M., Regulation of plasmin activation in mastitic milk. Correlation with inflammatory markers and growth of Streptococcus agalactiae, J. Vet. Med. B 34 (1986) 42-50.
31. Kaartinen L., Kuosa P.L., Veijalainen K., Sandholm M., Compartmentalization of milk N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAGase) by storage. Freezing and thawing, detergent and using cell stimulants, J. Vet. Med. B. 35 (1988) 408-414.
32. Kitchen B., Review of the progress of dairy science: Bovine mastitis: Milk compositional changes and related diagnostic tests, J. Dairy Res. 48 (1981) 167-188.
33. Kitchen B., Kwee W.S., Middleton G., Andrews R.J., Relationship between the level of N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAGase) in bovine milk and the presence of mastitis pathogens, J. Dairy Res. 51 (1984) 11-16.
34. Korhonen H., Kaartinen L., Changes in the composition of milk induced by mastitis, in: Sandholm M., Honkanen-Buzalski T., Kaartinen L., Pyörälä S. (Eds.), The bovine udder and mastitis, Gummerus, Jyväskylä, Finland, 1995, pp. 76-82.
35. Krömker V., Grabowski N.T., Redetzky R., Hamann J., Detection of mastitis using selected quarter-milk parameters, in: 2nd International Symposium on Bovine Mastitis and Milk Quality, Vancouver, Canada, 2001, pp. 486-487.
36. Laevens H., Deluyker H., Schukken Y.H., de Meulemeester L., Vandermeersch R., de Muelenaere E., de Kruif A., Influence of parity and stage of lactation on the somatic cell count in bacteriologically negative cows, J. Dairy Sci. 80 (1997) 3219-3226.
37. Maatje K., Huijsmans P.J.M., Rossing W., Hogewerf P.H., The efficacy of on-line measurement of quarter milk electrical conductivity, milk yield and milk temperature for the detection of clinical and subclinical mastitis, Livest. Prod. Sci. 30 (1992) 239-249.
38. Mansfeld R., Mansfeld S., Santl B., Hoedemaker M., New aspects regarding the use of the milk electrical conductivity as a parameter for routine diagnostics in dairy production medicine programs, in: 2nd Int. Symposium on Bovine Mastitis and Milk Quality, Vancouver, Canada, 2001, pp. 488-489.
39. Mattila T., Sandholm M., Antitrypsin and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase as markers of mastitis in a herd of Ayrshire cows, Am. J. Vet. Res. 46 (1986) 2453-2456.
40. Mattila T., Syväjärvi J., Sandholm M., Milk antitrypsin, NAGase, plasmin and bacterial replication rate in whey - effects of lactation stage, parity and daily milk yield, J. Vet. Med. B 33 (1986) 462-470.
41. Miller R.H., Paape M.J., Effects of parity, bacteriological status, stage of lactation, and dry period on N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase activity of milk and dry secretion, J. Dairy Sci. 71 (1988) 2508-2512.
42. Mottram T., Hart J., Pemberton R., Biosensing techniques for detecting abnormal and contaminated milk, in: Symposium on Robotic Milking, Lelystad, The Netherlands, 17-19 August, 2000, pp. 108-113.
43. Musser J.M.B., Anderson K.L., Caballero M., Amaya D., Maroto-Puga J., Evaluation of a hand-held electrical conductivity meter for detection of subclinical mastitis in cattle, Am. J. Vet. Res. 59 (1998) 1087-1091.
44. Nielen M, Deluyker H., Schukken Y., Brand A., Electrical conductivity of milk: measurement, modifiers, and meta-analysis of mastitis detection performance, J. Dairy Sci. 75 (1992) 606-614.
45. Nielen M., Schukken Y.H., Brand A., Detection of subclinical mastitis from on-line milking parlor data, J. Dairy Sci. 78 (1995) 1039-1049.
46. Ohtsuka H., Kudo K., Mori K., Nagai F., Hatsugay A., Tajima M., Tamura K., Hoshi F., Koiwa M., Kawamura S., Acute phase response in naturally occurring coliform mastitis, J. Vet. Med. Sci. 63 (2001) 675-678.
47. Östensson K., Hageltorn M., Astrom G., Differential cell counting in fraction-collected milk from dairy cows, Acta vet. Scand. 29 (1988) 493-500.
48. Pannen B.H., Robotham J.L., The acute-phase response, New Horizon 3 (1995) 183-197.
49. Pettersson G., Berglund I., Husfloen A., Tukiainen R., Svennersten-Sjaunja K., in: 1st Congress on Robotic Milking, Toronto, Canada, 2002, IV, p. 55.
50. Politis I., Ng Kwai Hang K.F., Giroux R.N., Environmental factors affecting plasmin activity in milk, J. Dairy. Sci. 72 (1989) 1713-1718.
51. Poutrel B., Rainard P., California mastitis test guide of selective dry cow therapy, J. Dairy Sci. 64 (1981) 241-248.
52. Pyörälä S., Kaartinen L., Milk plasmin, antitrypsin, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase and bacterial growth in lactoserum during the early postpartum period, Acta vet. Scand. 29 (1988) 145-150.
53. Pyörälä S., Pyörälä E., Accuracy of methods using somatic cell count and milk N-acetyl-β-D-Glucosaminidase activity in milk to assess the bacteriological cure of bovine clinical mastitis, J. Dairy Sci. 80 (1997) 2820-2825.
54. Rasmussen M.D., Evaluation of methods for detection of abnormal milk during automatic milking, in: Symposium on Robotic Milking, Lelystad, The Netherlands, 17-19 August, 2000, p. 125.
55. Raynes J.G., The acute phase response, Biochem. Sec. Trans. 22 (1994) 69-74.
56. Richardson T., McGann T.C.A., Kearney R.D., Levels and location of adenosine 5 triphosphate (ATP) in bovine milk, J. Dairy Sci. 47 (1980) 91-96.
57. Ruegg P.L., Reinemann D.J., Milk quality and mastitis tests, Bov. Pract. 36 (2002) 41-54.
58. Sandholm M., Detection of inflammatory changes in the milk, in: Sandholm M., Honkanen-Buzalski T., Kaartinen L., Pyörälä S. (Eds.), The bovine udder and mastitis, Gummerus, Jyväskylä, Finland, 1995, pp. 89-104.
59. Sandholm M., Honkanen-Buzalski T., Kangasniemi R., Milk trypsin-inhibitor capacity as an indicator of bovine mastitis - a novel principle which can be automated, J. Dairy Res. 51 (1984) 1-9.
60. Sargeant J.M., Leslie K.E., Shirley J.E., Pulkrabek J.L., Liim G.H., Sensitivity and specificity of somatic cell count and California Mastitis Test for identifying intramammary infection in early lactation, J. Dairy Sci. 84 (2001) 2018-2024.
61. Schrödl W., Krüger M., Hien T.T., Füldner M., Kunze R., C-reactive protein as a new parameter of mastitis, Tierärztl. Prax. 23 (1995) 337-341.
62. 1-acid glycoprotein in cattle, Jpn J. Vet. Sci. 51