Diameter increment in Picea abies shelterwood stands in northern Sweden

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 163-167

  Holgén, Per ^a   Söderberg, Ulf ^a   Hånell, Björn ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Growth allocation; Shelterwood density; Stem form

Indexed keywords

WOOD;

SHELTERWOOD;

FORESTRY;

ABIES; PICEA; PICEA ABIES;

EID: 10744224618     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827580310003731     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Barth, A. 1929. Skjermforyngelsen i produksionsøkonomisk belysning. Acta For. Fenn. 34 (15), 33 pp. (In Norwegian.)
2. Divoux, A. & Parde, J. 1980. An interesting reference: the spruce plantation at Servon-Saint-Thomas (Marne). Rev. For. Franc. 32: 373-378. (In French with English summary.)
3. Hagberg, N. 1942. Die Veränderungen der Stammform bei Kiefer und Fichte während der Bestandsentwicklung und nach Freistellung. Svenska Skogsv. fören. Tidskr., 46 pp. (In Swedish with German summary.)
4. Hånell, B. 1988. Postdrainage forest productivity of peatlands in Sweden. Can. J. For. Res. 18: 1443-1456.
5. Hånell, B. & Ottosson-Löfvenius, M. 1994. Windthrow after shelterwood cutting in Picea abies peatland forests. Scand. J. For. Res. 9: 261-269.
6. Hånell, B., Nordfjell, T. & Eliasson, L. 2000. Productivity in shelterwood harvesting. Scand. J. For. Res. 15: 561-569.
7. Holgén, P. & Hånell, B. 2000. Performance of planted and naturally regenerated seedlings in Norway spruce-dominated shelterwood stands and clearcuts in Sweden. For. Ecol. Manage. 127: 129-138.
8. Jacobs, M. R. 1954. The effect of wind sway on the form and development of Pinus radiata D. Don. Aust. J. Bot. 2: 35-51.
9. Jonsson, B. 1995. Thinning response functions for single trees of Pinus sylvestris L. and Picea abies (L.) Karst. Scand. J. For. Res. 10: 353-369.
10. Karlsson, K. 2000. Stem form and taper changes after thinning and nitrogen fertilization in Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris stands. Scand. J. For. Res. 15: 621-632.
11. Näslund, M. 1942. Die Reaktionsfähigkeit des alten norrländischen Fichtenwalds nach Durchung. Medd. Stat. Skogssfö rsöksanst. 33. (In Swedish with German summary.)
12. Nyblom, E. 1927. Alteration in the form of wholly liberated trees. J. Swed. For. Soc. 1927: 51-61. (In Swedish with English summary.)
13. O'Hara, K. L., Lähde, E., Laiho, O., Norokorpi, Y. & Saksa, T. 2001. Leaf area allocation as a guide to stocking control in multi-aged, mixed-conifer forests in southern Finland. Forestry 74: 171-185.
14. Phillips, E. J. 1996. Comparing silvicultural systems in a coastal montane forest: productivity and cost of harvesting operations. For. Engineering Res. Inst. of Canada, No. SR-109.
15. Urban, S. T., Lieffers, V. J. & Macdonald, S. E. 1994. Release in radial growth in the trunk and structural roots of white spruce as measured by dendrochronology. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 1550-1556.
16. Valinger, E. & Pettersson, N. 1996. Wind and snow damage in a thinning and fertilization experiment in Picea abies in southern Sweden. Forestry 69: 25-33.
17. Weihe, J. 1977. The correlation between stem diameter/height ratio, normal form factor and crown length ratio in Norway spruce stands. Forstarchiv 48: 200-203. (In German with English summary.)