Gadolinium Enhanced Endorectal Coil and Air Enema Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Useful Tool in the Preoperative Examination of Patients with Rectal Carcinoma

Hepato-Gastroenterology

Volumn 51, Issue 55, 2004, Pages 131-135

  Matsuoka, Hiroyoshi ^a   Masaki, Tadahiko ^a   Sugiyama, Masanori ^a   Nakamura, Akihisa ^a   Takahara, Taro ^a   Hachiya, Junichi ^a   Atomi, Yutaka ^a  

^a KYORIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; Rectal cancer

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM; SCOPOLAMINE BUTYL BROMIDE;

AIR ENEMA; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RECTUM CARCINOMA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AIR; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 10744221603     PISSN: 01726390     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Butch RJ, Stark DD, Wittenberg J: Staging rectal cancer by MRI and CT. AJR 1986; 146:1155-1160.
2. Chan TW, Kressel HY, Tomachefski J: Rectal carcinoma: Staging at MR imaging with endorectal coil. Work in progress. Radiology 1991; 181:461-467.
3. Okizuka H, Sugimura K, Ishida T: Preoperative local staging of rectal carcinoma with MR imaging and a rectal balloon. JMRI 1993; 3:329-335.
4. Kusunoki M, Yanagi H, Kamikonya N: Preoperative detection of local extension of carcinoma of the rectum using magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 179:653-656.
5. Drew PJ, Fraouk R, Turnbull LW, et al: Preoperative magnetic resonance staging of rectal cancer with an endorectal coil and dynamic gadolinium enhancement. Br J Surg 1999; 86:250-254.
6. Starck M, Bohe M, Fork F-T, et al: Endoluminal ultrasound and low-field magnetic resonance imaging are superior to clinical examination in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. EJS 1995; 161:841-845.
7. Hircak H, Alpers C, Crooks LE, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: initial experience. AJR 1983; 141:1119-1128.
8. Hircak H, Williams RD, Spring DB, et al: Anatomy and pathology of the male pelvis by magnetic resonance imaging. AJR 1983; 141:1101-1110.
9. Gualdi GF, Casciani E, Gaudalaxara A et al: Local staging of rectal cancer with transrectal ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43:338-345.
10. Guinet C, Buy J-N, Ghossain MA, et al: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Arch Surg 1990; 125:385-388.
11. Rifkin MD, Ehrlich MS, Marks G: Staging of rectal carcinoma: Prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT. Radiology 1989; 170:319-322.
12. Goldman S, Arvidsson H, Norming U, et al: Transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography in preoperative staging of lower rectal adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Radiol 1991; 16:259-263.
13. Palman L, Adalsteinsson B, Glimelius B, et al: Ultrasound in preoperative staging of rectal tumors. Acta Radiol Diagn 1984; 25:489-494.
14. Yamashita Y, Machi J, Shirouzu K, et al: Evaluation of endorectal ultrasound for the assessment of wall invasion of rectal cancer. Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1988; 31:617-623.
15. Saitoh N, Okui K, Sarashina H, et al: Evaluation of echographic diagnosis of rectal cancer using intrarectal ultrasonic examination. Dis Colon Rectum 1986; 29:234-242.
16. Katsura Y, Yamada K, Ishizawa T, et al: Endorectal ultrasography for the assessment of wall invasion and lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35:362-368.
17. Waizer A, et al: Prospective comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging versus transrectal ultrasound for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34:1068-1072.
18. Meyernberger C, Huch Boni RA, Bertschinger P, et al: Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. Endoscopy 1995; 27:469-479.
19. Hadfield MB, Nicholson AA, MacDonald AW, et al: Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by magnetic resonance imaging with a pelvic phased-array coil. Br J Surg 1997; 84:529-531.
20. McNicholas NMJ, Joyce WP, Dolan J, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging of rectal carcinoma: a prospective study. Br J Surg 1994; 81:911-914.
21. Cova M, et al: Contribution of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging to the preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma. Correlation with histopathologic findings. Radiol Med 1994; 87:82-87.
22. Thaler W, Watzka S, Martin F, et al: Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by endoluminal ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Preliminary results of a prospective, comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37:1189-1193.
23. Kim NK, Kim MJ, Yun SH, et al: Comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42:770-775.
24. Som PM: Detection of metastasis in cervical lymph nodes: CT and MRI criteria and differential diagnosis. AJR 1992; 158:961-969.
25. Yousem DM, Som PM, Hackney DB, et al: Central nodal necrosis and extracapsular neoplastic spread in cervical lymph nodes: MR imaging versus CT. Radiology 1992; 182:753-759.
26. van den Brekel MWM, Castelijns JA, Snow GB: Detection of lymph node metastases in the neck: Radiologic criteria. Radiology 1994; 192:617-618.