Response spectral attenuation relationships for Sumatran-subduction earthquakes and the seismic hazard implications to Singapore and Kuala Lumpur

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 11-25

  Megawati, Kusnowidjaja ^a   Pan, Tso Chien ^b   Koketsu, Kazuki ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Distant earthquakes; Kuala Lumpur; Malay Peninsula; Response spectral attenuation; Singapore; Sumatran subduction; Synthetic seismogram

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; HAZARDS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SEISMOLOGY; VELOCITY MEASUREMENT;

PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION (PGA); PEAK GROUND VELOCITY (PGV); RESPONSE SPECTRAL ACCELERATION (RSA); SEISMIC HAZARDS;

EARTHQUAKES;

EARTHQUAKE; SEISMIC ATTENUATION; SEISMIC HAZARD; SUBDUCTION ZONE; SYNTHETIC SEISMOGRAM;

ASIA; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; KUALA LUMPUR [KUALA LUMPUR (FDT)]; KUALA LUMPUR [WEST MALAYSIA]; MALAYSIA; SINGAPORE [SINGAPORE (NTN)]; SINGAPORE [SOUTHEAST ASIA]; SOUTHEAST ASIA; WEST MALAYSIA; WORLD;

EID: 10644291812     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. T.-C. Pan Site-dependent building response in Singapore to long-distance Sumatra earthquakes Earthquake Spectra 13 3 1997 475-488
2. K. Megawati T-C. Pan Prediction of the maximum credible ground motion in Singapore due to a great Sumatran subduction earthquake: The worst-case scenario Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 31 8 2002 1501-1523
3. K. Megawati T-C. Pan K. Koketsu Response spectral attenuation relationships for Singapore and the Malay Peninsula due to distant Sumatran-fault earthquakes Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 32 14 2003 2241-2265
4. K. Sieh D. Natawidjaja Neotectonics of the Sumatran fault, Indonesia J Geophys Res 105 B12 2000 28295-28326
5. L. Prawirodirdjo Y. Bock J.F. Genrich S.S.O. Puntodewo J. Rais C. Subarya One century of tectonic deformation along the Sumatran fault from triangulation and Global Positioning System surveys J Geophys Res 105 B12 2000 28343-28361
6. K.M. Larson J.T. Freymueller S. Philipson Global plate velocities from the Global Positioning System J Geophys Res 102 B5 1997 9961-9981
7. R. McCaffrey Slip vectors and stretching of the Sumatran fore arc Geology 19 9 1991 881-884
8. R. McCaffrey Oblique plate convergence, slip vectors, and forearc deformation J Geophys Res 97 B6 1992 8905-8915
9. T.J. Fitch Plate convergence, transcurrent faults, and internal deformation adjacent to Southeast Asia and the western Pacific J Geophys Res 77 23 1972 4432-4460
10. K.R. Newcomb W.R. McCann Seismic history and seismotectonics of the Sunda Arc J Geophys Res 92 B1 1987 421-439
11. R.M. Fauzi R. McCaffrey D. Wark Sunaryo P.Y. Prih Haryadi Lateral variation in slab orientation beneath Toba Caldera, northern Sumatra Geophys Res Lett 23 5 1996 443-446
12. J. Zachariasen K. Sieh F.W. Taylor R.L. Edwards W.S. Hantoro Submergence and uplift associated with the giant 1833 Sumatran subduction earthquake: Evidence from coral microatolls J Geophys Res 104 B1 1999 895-919
13. T-C. Pan J. Sun Historical earthquakes felt in Singapore Bull Seismological Soc Am 86 4 1996 1173-1178
14. w=7.7): Another warning to remote metropolitan areas Seismological Res Lett 72 2 2001 171-185
15. Harvard Seismology Centroid Moment Tensor Database. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University website: http://www.seismology.harvard.edu/CMTsearch.html.
16. K. Kohketsu The extended reflectivity method for synthetic near-field seismograms J Phys Earth 33 2 1985 121-131
17. V.K. Fuchs Das reflexions- und transmissionsvermogen eines geschichteten mediums mit beliebiger tiefen-verteilung der elastischen moduln und der dischte fur schragen einfall ebener wellen Z Geophysik 34 1968 389-413
18. P.G. Somerville J.P. McLaren L.V. LeFevre R.W. Burger D.V. Helmberger Comparison of source scaling relations of eastern and western North American earthquakes Bull Seismological Soc Am 77 2 1987 322-346
19. Laske G. Masters G. Reif C. CRUST 2.0: A new global crustal model at 2×2 degrees. Institute of geophysics and planetary physics, The University of California, San Diego, website: http://mahi.ucsd.edu/Gabi/rem.dir/crust/crust2.html.
20. A.K. Chopra Dynamics of structures 1995 Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 195-231
21. w 7.9 earthquakes south of Sumatra: Deformation in the India-Australia plate J Geophys Res-Solid Earth 108 B1 2003 2018
22. R.R. Youngs S.-J. Chiou W.J. Silva J.R. Humphrey Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes Seismological Res Lett 68 1 1997 58-73
23. G.L. Molas F. Yamazaki Attenuation of earthquake ground motion in Japan including deep focus events Bull Seismological Soc Am 85 5 1995 1343-1358
24. G.M. Atkinson D.M. Boore Stochastic point-source modeling of ground motions in the Cascadia Region Seismological Res Lett 68 1 1997 74-85
25. Y. Fukushima T. Tanaka A new attenuation relation for peak horizontal acceleration of strong earthquake ground motion in Japan Bull Seismological Soc Am 80 4 1990 757-783
26. T.H. Heaton F. Tajima A.W. Mori Estimating ground motions using recorded accelerograms Surveys Geophysics 8 1 1986 25-83
27. T-Y. Chang F. Cotton J. Angelier Seismic attenuation and peak ground acceleration in Taiwan Bull Seismological Soc Am 91 5 1990 1229-1246
28. British Standards Institution Structural use of concrete, Part 1. Code of practice for design and construction, BS 8110 1985 BSI London