Multi-attribute assessment of acceptability of operations in the pulp and paper industries

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 227-243

  Mikkilä, Mirja ^a,b   Kolehmainen, Osmo ^a   Pukkala, Timo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b Leppärinne 5 D 33   (Finland)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Business ethics; China; Corporate social performance; Corporate social responsibility; Cross cultural comparison; Finland; Forestry; Germany; Globalisation; Internationalisation; Multi attribute decision making; Portugal

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; MULTI-ATTRIBUTE ASSESSMENT; STAKEHOLDERS;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; PUBLIC POLICY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

PAPER AND PULP INDUSTRY;

ACCEPTABILITY; E I S; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; PAPER INDUSTRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 10644288698     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00062-5     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alho J.M., Kangas J., Kolehmainen O. Uncertainty in expert predictions of the ecological consequences of forest plans. Applied Statistics. 45:(1):1996;1-14
2. Alho J.M., Kangas J. Analyzing uncertainties in expert's opinions of forest plan performance. Forest Science. 43:(4):1997;521-528
3. Alho J.M., Kolehmainen O., Leskinen P. Regression methods for pairwise comparison data. Schmoldt D., Kangas J., Mendoza G., Pesonen M. The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resources and Environmental Decision Making. 2001;Kluver Academic Publishers, Dordrect
4. Al-Rashdan D., Al-Kloub B., Dean A., Al-Shemmeri T. Environmental impact assessment and ranking the environmental projects in Jordan. European Journal of Operational Research. 118:1999;30-45
5. Carroll A.B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review. 4:1979;497-506
6. Carroll A.B. Stakeholder thinking in three models of management morality: a perspective with strategic implications. Näsi J. Understanding Stakeholder Thinking. 1995;LSR-Publications, Jyväskylä
7. Carvalho Mendes, A.M.S. 1999. Portugal. in : Pelkonen, P., Pitkänen, A., Schmidt, P., Oesten, G., Piussi, P., Rojas, E. (Eds.), Forestry in changing societies in Europe, Part II: Forestry in changing societies, country reports. SILVA Network
8. Clarkson M.B. A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review. 20:(1):1995;92-117
9. Donaldson T., Preston L.E. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review. 20:(1):1995;65-91
10. Eronen, J., Deqiang, M. 1992. China's paper industry: structure and development trends. Lappeenranta University of Technology, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management. Research Report 48. Lappeenranta
11. Frederick W.C. Values, Nature and Culture in the American Corporation. 1995;Oxford University Press, New York
12. Freeman R.E. Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach. 1984;Pitman Publishing Inc, London
13. Fritzsche D.J. A model of decision-making incorporating ethical values. Journal of Business Ethics. 10:1991;841-852
14. Halme, M. 1997. Environmental management paradigm shifts in business enterprises. Acta Universitas Tamperensis 542. University of Tampere
15. Hellström, E., Reunala, A. 1995. Forestry conflicts from 1950s to 1983. European Forest Institute. Research Report 3. Joensuu
16. Hellström, E. 2001. Conflict Cultures - Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Environmental Conflicts in Forestry. Silva Fennica, Monographs 2. Väitöskirja, Helsingin yliopisto, Ympäristöekonomian laitos
17. Hofstede G. Cultures and Organisations: Software of the Mind. Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival. 1991;McGraw-Hill International, Glasgow
18. Jones T.M. Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review. 20:(2):1995;404-437
19. Kangas, J. 1992. Metsikön uudistamisketjun valinta-monitavoitteiseen hyótyteoriaan perustuva päätösanalyysimalli. (In Finnish, choosing the regeneration chain in a forest stand: a decision analysis model based on multi-attribute utility theory). University of Joensuu, publications in sciences No. 24. Joensuu
20. Kangas, J., Alho, J.M, Kolehmainen, O., Mononen, A. 1998. Analyzing consistency of expert's judgements - case of assessing forest biodiversity. Forest Science, 44(4)
21. Korten D. When corporations rule the world. 1995;Kumarian Press Inc., Connecticut, U.S.A., Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc, California, U.S.A
22. Kuusipalo J., Kangas J., Vesa L. Sustainable forest management in tropical rain forests: a planning approach and case study from Indonesian Borneo. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 5:(3-4):1997;93-118
23. Kuvaja, S., Ulvila, M., Wallgren, T. 1998. Tropiikin vihreä kulta; Pohjolan pojat Kaakkois-Aasian sademetsissä (in Finnish, Green gold of the tropics; northern lads in the South-East Asian rain forests). Helsinki
24. Leskinen P., Kangas J. Analysing uncertainties of interval judgement data in multiple-criteria evaluation of forest plans. Silva Fennica. 32:(4):1998;363-372
25. Miettinen, O., Selin, T. 1999. Harkittu riski; UPM-Kymmene Indonesian sademetsissä (in Finnish, Controlled risk; UPM-Kymmene in Indonesian rain forests). Saarijärvi
26. Miles M., Huberman M. Qualitative Data Analysis: a Sourcebook of New Methods. 1984;Sage, Newbury Park
27. Millet I. Ethical decision-making using the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Business Ethics. 17:1998;1197-1204
28. Neilson D., Flynn B. Seventh Annual International Woodchip and Pulplog Trade Review. 2000 ed :2000;Dana Publishing
29. Payne D., Raiborn C., Askvik J. A global code of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics. 16:(16):1997;1727-1735
30. Poesche, J. 1997. Choice of technology in a natural resource-based industry: business ethics in the pulp and paper industry. Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration. Acta Universitatis Oeconomicae Helsingiensis, A-133. Helsinki
31. Richardson S.D. Forests and forestry in China, Changing Patterns of Resource Development. 1990;Island Press, Washington
32. Rosenbaum A.L. State and society in China, the Consequences of Reform. 1992;Westview Press, San Francisco
33. Saaty T.L. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 15:1977;234-281
34. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. 1980;McGraw-Hill, Inc, United States of America
35. Saaty T.L., Vargas F. Comparison of eigenvalue, logarithmic least squares and least squares methods in estimating ratios. Mathematical Modelling. 5:1984;309-324
36. Uimonen, A.-M. 1998. Nätti-Jussin uudet seikkailut, Suomalainen metsäteollisuus ympäristöpaineissa 1990-luvun Saksassa (In Finnish, Nätti-Jussi's new adventures, Finnish pulp and paper industries in environmental pressure in Germany in the 1990s). Lisensiaattitutkimus. Jyväskylän yliopisto, Taloustieteellinen osasto, Julkaisuja N:o 113/1998. Jyväskylä