Fury over sound

Arthritis Care and Research

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 877-880

  Van Holsbeeck, Marnix ^a,b  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b HENRY FORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPATHY; BONE DISEASE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REIMBURSEMENT; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; RHEUMATOLOGY;

HUMANS; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; RHEUMATOLOGY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 10644277111     PISSN: 21514658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/art.20835     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. Brown AK, O'Connor PJ, Wakefield RJ, Roberts TE, Karim Z, Emery P. Practice, training, and assessment among experts performing musculoskeletal ultrasonography: towards the development of an international consensus of educational standards for ultrasonography for rheumatologists. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:1018-22.
2. Genovese RL, Rantanen NW, Hauser ML, Simpson BS. Diagnostic ultrasonography of equine limbs. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1986;2:145-226.
3. Golding FC. The shoulder: the forgotten joint. Br J Radiol 1962;35:149-58.
4. van Holsbeeck MT, Introcaso JH. Musculoskeletal ultrasound. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2001.
5. Hillman BJ, Joseph CA, Mabry MR, Sunshine JH, Kennedy SD, Noether M. Frequency and costs of diagnostic imaging in office practice: a comparison of self-referring and radiologist-referring physicians. N Engl J Med 1990;323:1604-8.
6. Levin DC, Edmiston RB, Ricci JA, Beam LM, Rosetti GF, Harford RJ. Self-referral in private offices for imaging studies performed in Pennsylvania Blue Shield subscribers during 1991. Radiology 1993;189:371-5.
7. Rosenfeld RH. Market forces set off skyrocketing interest in hospital-doctor ventures. Mod Healthcare 1984;4:60-4.
8. Kouri BE, Parsons RG, Alpert HR. Physician self-referral for diagnostic imaging: review of the empiric literature. Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:843-50.
9. Hopper KD, Rosetti GF, Edmiston RB, Madewell JE, Beam LM, Landis JR, et al. Diagnostic radiology peer review: a method inclusive of all interpreters of radiographic examinations regardless of specialty. Radiology 1991;180:557-61.
10. Verrilli DK, Bloch SM, Rousseau J, Crozier ME, Yecies SB. Design of a privileging program for diagnostic imaging: costs and implications for a large insurer in Massachusetts. Radiology 1998;208:385-92.
11. Edmiston RB, Levin DC. Film quality assessment varies among specialties. Diagn Imaging 1992;14:37-9.
12. Moskowitz H, Sunshine J, Grossman D, Adams L, Gelinas L. The effect of imaging guidelines on the number and quality of outpatient radiographic examinations. Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:9-15.
13. Nazarian L, Levin D, Maitino A, Parker L, Sunshine J. Trends in nationwide utilization of musculoskeletal ultrasound: a five-year analysis of the Medicare population. Presentation at the Radiological Society Meeting, December 5, 2002. Available at http://archive.RSNA.org.
14. van Holsbeeck M, van Holsbeeck K, Gevers G, Marchal G, van Steen A, Favril A, et al. Staging and follow-up of rheumatoid arthritis of the knee: comparison of sonography, thermography, and clinical assessment. J Ultrasound Med 1988;7: 561-6.
15. Fornage BD, Rifkin MD, Touche DH, Segal PM. Sonography of the patellar tendon: preliminary observations. Am J Roentgenol 1984;143:179-82.
16. Middleton WD, Reinus WR, Totty WG, Melson GL, Murphy WA. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the rotator cuff and biceps tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68:440-50.