Force response of a viscous liquid in a probe-tack geometry: Fingering versus cavitation

European Physical Journal E

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 97-116

  Poivet, S ^a   Nallet, F ^a   Gay, C ^a   Teisseire, J ^a   Fabre, P ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; APPROXIMATION THEORY; CAVITATION; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; PHASE DIAGRAMS; VISCOELASTICITY; VISCOUS FLOW;

EXTENSIONAL FLOW; POLYMERS ON SURFACES; VISCOELASTIC SOLIDS; VISCOUS LIQUID;

LIQUIDS;

EID: 10644261467     PISSN: 12928941     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1140/epje/i2004-10040-2     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. C. Creton, P. Fabre, in The Mechanics of Adhesion, edited by D.A. Dilliard, A.V. Pocius (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2002) p. 535.
2. For a short review on stickiness, see C. Gay, L. Leibler, Phys. Today 52, 48 (1999).
3. A. Zosel, Colloid Polym. Sci. 263, 541 (1985).
4. H. Lakrout, P. Sergot, C. Creton, J. Adhes. 69, 307 (1999).
5. K.R. Shull, C.M. Flanigan, A.J. Crosby, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3057 (2000).
6. A. Ghatak, M.K. Chaudhury, V. Shenoy, A. Sharma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4329 (2000).
7. S. Poivet, F. Nallet, C. Gay, P. Fabre, Europhys. Lett. 62, 244 (2003).
8. P.G. Saffman, G.I. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 245, 312 (1958).
9. P. Tordjeman, É. Papon, J.-J. Villenave, J. Polym. Sci. B 38, 1201 (2000).
10. B.A. Francis, R.G. Horn, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 4167 (2001).
11. D. Derks, A. Lindner, C. Creton, D. Bonn, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 1557 (2003).
12. M. Tirumkudulu, W.B. Russel, T.J. Huang, Phys. Fluids 15, 1588 (2003).
13. A. Roy, S. Roy, A.J. Bhattacharyya, S. Banerjee, S. Tarafdar, Eur. Phys. J. B 12, 1 (1999).
14. J.J. Bikerman, J. Colloid Sci. 2, 163 (1947).
15. A. Berker, in The Mechanics of Adhesion, edited by D.A. Dilliard, A.V. Pocius (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2002) p. 443.
16. M.J. Shelley, F.-R. Tian, K. Wlodarski, Nonlinearity 10, 1471 (1997).
17. C. Gay, L. Leibler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 936 (1999).
18. G. de Crevoisier, PhD Thesis, Université Paris 6 (1999).
19. 0, Δp, Following the same approach as developed in this Section, one obtains exactly the same diagrams as those presented in Figures 19 and 21.
20. Equation (19) has been numerically solved using Maple V, Waterloo Maple Inc.
21. http://scilabsoft.inria.fr/.