In defence of the dichotomy

Pharmaceutical Statistics

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 77-79

  Lewis, John A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL STUDY; COGNITION; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RATING SCALE; REVIEW; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 10644246879     PISSN: 15391604     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pst.107     Document Type: Review

References (4)

1. Senn S. Disappointing dichotomies. Pharmaceutical Statistics 2003; 2:239-240.
2. Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products. Points to consider on multiplicity issues in clinical trials (CPMP/EWP/908 /99 . EMEA: London, 2002. Available at www.emea.eu.int.
3. Lewis J, Louv W, Rockhold F, Sato T. The impact of the international guideline entitled Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials (ICH E9). Statistics in Medicine 2001; 20:2549-2560.
4. Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products. Note for guidance on medicinal products in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (CPMP/EWP/553/95). EMEA: London, 1997. Available at www.emea.eu.int.