Expectation-based, inference-based, and bottom-up software comprehension

Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 427-447

  O'Brien, Michael P ^a   Buckley, Jim ^a   Shaft, Teresa M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive strategies; Program understanding; Software comprehension; Top down comprehension

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; COSTS; LIFE CYCLE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; RESEARCH;

COGNITIVE STRATEGIES; PROGRAM UNDERSTANDING; SOFTWARE COMPREHENSION; TOP-DOWN COMPREHENSION;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 10644244536     PISSN: 1532060X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smr.307     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. De Lucia A, Fasolino AR, Munro M. Understanding function behaviours through program slicing. Proceedings 4th Workshop on Program Comprehension. IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos CA, 1996; 9-19.
2. Rajlich V. Program reading and comprehension. Proceedings of Summer School on Engineering of Existing Software, Dipartimento di Informatica, University of Bari, Italy, 1994; 161-178.
3. Shneiderman B, Mayer R. Syntactic/semantic interactions in programmer behaviour, International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 1979; 8(3):10-24.
4. Pennington N. Comprehension strategies in programming. Empirical Studies of Programmers: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop. Ablex: Norwood NJ, 1987; 100-113.
5. Linger RC, Mills HD, Witt BI. Structured Programming: Theory and Practice. Addison-Wesley: Boston MA, 1979; 402.
6. Eysenck MW, Keane MT. Cognitive Psychology: A Student's Handbook. Psychology Press: East Sussex, U.K., 2000; 151-182.
7. Detienne F. Software Design-Cognitive Aspects. Springer: London, 2002; 75-102.
8. Ramalingham V, Weidenbeck S. An empirical study of novice program comprehension in the imperative and object-oriented styles. Proceedings of 7th Workshop on Empirical Studies of Programmers. Ablex: Norwood NJ, 1997; 124-139.
9. Green TRG. Personal correspondence, 2002.
10. Letovsky S. Cognitive processes in program comprehension. Empirical Studies of Programmers: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop. Ablex: Norwood NJ, 1986; 58-79.
11. Von Mayrhauser A, Vans AM. From code understanding needs to reverse engineering tool capabilities. Proceedings 6th International Workshop on Computer-Aided Software Engineering (CASE '93). IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos CA, 1993; 230-239.
12. Von Mayrhauser A, Vans AM. Program understanding behavior during debugging of large scale software. Empirical Studies of Programmers: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop. Ablex: Norwood NJ, 1997; 157-179.
13. Blum BI. Volume, distance, and productivity. Journal of Systems and Software 1989; 10(3):217-226.
14. Brooks R. Towards a theory of the comprehension of computer programs. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 1983; 18(6):543-554.
15. Shaft TM, Vessey I. The relevance of application domain knowledge: The case of computer program comprehension. Information Systems Research 1995; 6(3):286-299.
16. Good J. Programming paradigms, information types and graphical representations: Empirical investigations of novice program comprehension. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1999; 19-207.
17. Von Mayrhauser A, Vans A, Howe AE. Program understanding behaviour during enhancement of large scale software. Journal of Software Maintenance: Research and Practice 1997; 9(5):299-327.
18. Von Mayrhauser A, Vans AM. Program understanding: Models and experiments. Advances in Computers 1995; 40(4):25-46.
19. Soloway E, Ehrlich K. Empirical studies of programming knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 1984; 10(5):595-609.
20. O'Brien MP, Buckley J. Inference-based and expectation-based processing in program comprehension. Proceedings 9th International Workshop on Program Comprehension. IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos CA, 2001; 71-79.
21. Wiedenbeck S. Beacons in computer program comprehension. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 1986; 25(6):697-709.
22. Storey M-AD, Fracchia FD, Millier HA. Cognitive design elements to support the construction of a mental model during software exploration. The Journal of Systems and Software 1999; 44(1):171-185.
23. Tilley S, Paul S, Smith D. Towards a framework for program understanding. Proceedings 4th International Workshop on Program Comprehension. IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos CA, 1996; 19-28.
24. Rist R. Plans in programming: definition, demonstration, and development. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on the Empirical Studies of Programmers. Ablex: Norwood NJ, 1986; 28-47.
25. O'Brien MP, Buckley J. The GIB talk-aloud classification schema. Technical Report 2000-l-IT, Limerick Institute of Technology, 2000. Available on request from authors.
26. Ericsson K, Simmons H. Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review 1980; 89(3):215-251.
27. Russo J, Johnson E, Stephens D. The validity of verbal protocols. Memory and Cognition 1989; 17(6):759-769.
28. Lind R, Vairavan K. An experimental study of software metrics and their relationship to software development effort. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 1989; 15(5):649-653.
29. Shaft TM. The role of application domain knowledge in computer program comprehension and enhancement. Doctoral Dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park PA, 1992; 213-269.
30. Hartmann D. Considerations in the choice of inter-observer reliability estimates. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 1977; 10:103-116.
31. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33(1):159-174.
32. Conover WJ. Practical Nonparametric Statistics (3rd edn). Wiley: New York NY, 1999; 584.
33. Shaft TM, Vessey I. The relevance of application domain knowledge: Characterizing the computer program comprehension process. The Journal of Management Information Systems 1998; 15(1):51-78.
34. Singer J, Lethbridge T. Practices of software maintenance. Proceedings International Conference on Software Maintenance. IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos CA, 1998; 139-145.
35. Von Mayrhauser A, Vans M, Lang S. Program comprehension and enhancement of software. Proceedings of the 15th IFIP World Computing Congress - Information Technology and Knowledge Systems. Austrian Computer Society: Vienna, Austria.
36. Littman D, Pinto J, Letovsky S, Soloway E. Mental models and software maintenance. Empirical Studies of Programmers: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop. Ablex: Norwood NJ, 1986; 80-98.
37. Perry D, Porter A, Votta L. A primer on empirical studies. Proceedings International Conference on Software Maintenance. IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos CA, 1997; 657-658.
38. Gellenbeck EM, Cook CR. An investigation of procedure and variable names as beacons during code comprehension. Empirical Studies of Programmers: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop. Ablex: Norwood NJ, 1991; 65-81.
39. Gellenbeck EM, Cook CR. Does signalling help professional programmers read and understand computer programs. Empirical Studies of Programmers: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop. Ablex: Norwood NJ, 1991; 82-98.