Multidisciplinary design optimisation and robust design approaches applied to concurrent design

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 356-371

  Giassi, A ^a,b   Bennis, F ^b   Maisonneuve, J J ^a  

^a SIREHNA Technocampus Océan   (France)

^b ECOLE CENTRALE DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

Concurrent engineering; Multidisciplinary; Multiobjective; Optimisation; Robust design

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DESIGN; HYDRODYNAMICS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); ROUGH SET THEORY; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION;

MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION (MOD); MULTIOBJECTIVE; PERFORMANCE LOSSES; ROBUST DESIGN;

CONCURRENT ENGINEERING;

EID: 10644235506     PISSN: 1615147X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-004-0417-9     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Balling, R.J.; Rawlings, M.R. 2000: Collaborative optimization with disciplinary conceptual design. Struct. Multidisciplinary Optim. 20, 232-241
2. Balling, R.J.; Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1996: Optimization of coupled systems: a critical overview of approaches. AIAA J. 34, 6-17
3. Crane, C.L.; Eda, H.; Landsburg, A. 1989: Controllability. Principles Naval Arch. 3, SNAME, 383-396
4. Giassi, A.; Bennis, F.; Maisonneuve, J.J. 2003: Multi-objective optimisation of ship hull with distributed application. Proc. ASME DETC'03 (held in Chicago, IL), DAC paper no. 48731
5. Giassi, A.; Pediroda, V.; Poloni, C.; Clarich, A., 2003: Three-dimensional inverse design of turbomachinery with neural-networks and direct flow solver. Inverse Problems in Engineering, Taylor & Francis, 11, 457-470
6. Kalsi, M.; Hacker, K.; Lewis, K. 2001: A comprehensive robust design approach for decision trade-offs in complex system design. ASME J. Mech. Des. 123, 1-10
7. Khatib, W.; Fleming, P. 1998: Evolutionaxy collaborative optimisation architectures. In: Proc. Multidisciplinary Design and Optimisation, (held in London, UK). 8.1-13
8. Li, W.; Huyse, L.; Padula, S. 2002: Robust airfoil optimization to achieve drag reduction over a range of Mach numbers. Struct. Multidisciplinary Optim. 24, 38-50
9. Lloyd, A.R.J. 1989: Seakeeping: ship behaviour in rough weather. Ellis Norwood Series in Marine Technology, Chichester, pp. 349-377
10. Meinecke, S.; Féru, F. 2002: Advanced product data management concept. In: Proc. 3rd Enhance Forum (held in Toulouse, France)
11. Mistree, F.; Muster, D.; Smith, W.F.; Bras, B.; Allen, J.K. 1990: Decision-based design: a contemporary paradigm for ship design. In: Proc. of the Annual Meeting, The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (held in San Francisco, CA) modeFRONTIER, http://www.esteco.it/
12. Pendleton, E.W.; Bessette, D.; Field, P.B.; Miller, G.D.; Griffin, K.E. 2000: Active aeroelastic wing flight research program: technical program and model analytical development. J. Aircraft 4(37), 554-561
13. Poloni, C.; Giurgevich, A.; Onesti, L.; Pediroda, V. 2000: Hybridization of a multi-objective genetic algorithm, a neural network and a classical optimizer for complex design problem in fluid dynamics, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Elsevier Science, 186, 2, 403-420
14. Quagliarella, D.; Periaux, J.; Poloni, C.; Winter, G. 1997: Genetic algorithms and evolution strategies in engineering and computer science. Wiley
15. Whicker, L.F.; Fehlner, L.F. 1958: Free stream characteristics of a family of low aspect ratio all moveable control surfaces for application to ship design. DTMB Report 933
16. Winner, R.I.;Pennel, J.P.;Bertrand, H.E.; Slusarezuk, M.M.G. 1988: The role of concurrent engineering in weapons system acquisition. IDA Report R-388. Alexandria: Institute for Defence Analyses