Edge effects and isolation: Red-backed voles revisited

Conservation Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1658-1664

  Tallmon, David A ^a,c   Scott Mills, L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA SOUTHEAST   (United States)

Author keywords

Abundance; Density; Edge effects; Habitat fragmentation; Metareplication; Relative density; Survival

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; EDGE EFFECT; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; POPULATION DENSITY; RODENT; SURVIVAL;

CLETHRIONOMYS; CLETHRIONOMYS CALIFORNICUS; MURIDAE;

EID: 10644231975     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00439.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Debinski, D. M., and R. D. Holt. 2000. A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conservation Biology 14:342-355.
2. Gashwiler, J. S. 1970. Plant and mammal changes on a clear-cut in West-Central Oregon. Ecology 51:1018-1926.
3. Hayward, G. D., S. H. Henry, and L. F. Ruggiero. 1999. Response of red-backed voles to recent patch cutting in subalpine forest. Conservation Biology 13:168-176.
4. Johnson, D. N. 2002. The importance of replication in wildlife research. The Journal of Wildlife Management 66:919-932.
5. Kareiva, P. and M. Anderson. 1988. Spatial aspects of species interactions: the wedding of models and experiments. Pages 38-54 in A. Hastings, editor. Community ecology. Springer Verlag, New York.
6. Kendall, W. L., J. D. Nichols, and J. E. Hines. 1997. Estimating temporary emigration and breeding proportions using capture-recapture data with Pollock's robust design. Ecology 78:563-578.
7. Lair, K. L. 2001. The effects of forest fragmentation and forest edge on southern red-backed vole abundance and survival. M.S. thesis. University of Montana, Missoula.
8. Maser, C., J. H. Trappe, and R. A. Nussbaum. 1978. Fungal-small mammal interrelationships with emphasis on Oregon coniferous zones. Ecology 59:799-809.
9. Mills, L. S. 1995. Edge effects and isolation: red-backed voles on forest remnants. Conservation Biology 9:395-403.
10. Mills, L. S., M. K. Schwartz, D. A. Tallmon, and K. P. Lair. 2003. Measuring and interpreting changes in connectivity for mammals in coniferous forests. Pages 587-613 in C. J. Zabel and R. G. Anthony, editors. Mammal community dynamics in western coniferous forests: management and conservation issues. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
11. Nichols, J. D., and K. H. Pollock. 1983. Estimation methodology in contemporary small mammal capture-recapture studies. Journal of Mammalogy 64:253-260.
12. Pollock, K. H., J. D. Nichols, C. Brownie, and J. E. Hines. 1990. Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildlife Monographs 107.
13. Rice, W. R., and S. D. Gaines. 1989. One-way analysis of variance with unequal variances. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 86:8183-8184.
14. Tallmon, D. A., H. M. Draheim, L. S. Mills, and F. W. Allendorf. 2002. Insights into fragmented vole populations form combined genetic and demographic data. Molecular Ecology 11:699-709.
15. Tallmon, D. A., E. S. Jules, N. Radke, and L. S. Mills. 2003. Of mice and men and trillium: cascading effects of forest fragmentation. Ecological Applications 13:1193-1203.
16. Tevis, L. 1956. Responses of small mammal populations to logging of Douglas-fir. Journal of Mammalogy 37:189-196.
17. Weins, J. A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Function Ecology 3:385-397.
18. White G. C., and K. P. Burnham. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked individuals. Bird Study 46(supplement):120-138.