Homologous intrauterina insemination: Review of 430 cycles and evaluation of prognostic factors;Inseminación intrauterina homóloga: Revisión de 430 ciclos y evaluación de los factores pronósticos

Revista Iberoamericana de Fertilidad y Reproduccion Humana

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 15-23

  De la Cuesta, R ^a   Gaitero, A ^a   Tasende, M ^a   Iglesias, E ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO PUERTA DE HIERRO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Homologous intrauterine insemination; Prognostic factors

Indexed keywords

RECOMBINANT CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE TEST; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DISEASE DURATION; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; OVARY FOLLICLE; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY RATE; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SUBFERTILITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 10644231902     PISSN: 11320249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Goverde AJ, McDonnell J, Vermeiden JP, Schats R, Rutten FF, Schoemaker J.: Intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization in idiophatic subfertility. Lancet 2000; 355:13-8.
2. Philips Z, Bazarra-Llorens M, Poenett J.: Evaluation of the relative cost-effectiveness of treatments for infertility in the UK. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:95-106.
3. Campana A, Sakkas S, Stalberg A, Bianchi PG, Comte I, Pache T, et al.: Intrauterina insemination : evolution of the results according to the woman's age, sperm quality, totoal sperm count per isemination and life table analysis. Hum Reprod 1996 ; 11(4): 732-6.
4. Khalil MR, Rasmussen PE, Erb K, Laursen SB, Rex S, Westergaard LG.: Homologous intrauterine insemination. An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 2473 cycles. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80:74-81.
5. Dickey RP, Taylor SN, Lu PY, Sartor BM; Rye PH, Pyrzak R.: Effect of diagnosis, age, sperm quality, and number of preovulatory follicules on the outcome of multiples cycles of clomiphene citrate-intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2002 Nov; 78(5): 1088-95.
6. a ed.Madrid: McGraw-hill Interamericana; 2002.p.263-72.
7. Duran HE, Morshedi M, Kruger T, Oehninger S.: Intrauterine insemination: a systematic review on determinants of success. Hum Reprod Update 2002; 8(4):373-84.
8. Nuojua-Huttenen S, Tomas C, Bloigu R, Tuomivaara L, Martikainen H.: Intrauterine insemination treatment in subfertility:an analysis of factors affecting outcome. Hum Reprod 1999; 14(3): 698-703.
9. Stone BA, Vargyas JM, Ringler GE, Stein AL, Marrs RP.: Determinants of the outcome of intrauterine insemination: analysis of outcomes of 9963 consecutive cycles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180(6): 1522-34.
10. Hendin BN, Falcone T, Hallak J, Nelson DR, Vemullapalli S, Golberg J, et al.: The effect of patient and semen characteristics on live birth following intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2000; 1785). 245-52.
11. Van Der Westerlaken LA, Naaktgeboren N, Helmerhorst FM.: Evaluation of pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination according to indication, age, and sperm parameters, J Assist Reprod Genet 1998; 15(6): 359-64.
12. Houmard BS, Juang MP, Soules MR, Fujimoto VY.: Factors influencing pregnancy rates with a combined clomiphene citrate/ gonadotrofin protocol for non-assisted reproductive technology fertility treatament. Fertil Steril 2002; 77(2): 384-6.
13. Tomlison MJ, Amissah-Arthur JB, Thompson KA, Kasraie JL, Bebtick B.: Prognostic indicators for intrauterine insemination (IUI : statistical model for IUI success. Hum Reprod 1996; 11(9): 1892-6.
14. Grupo de interés de Centros de reproducción Humana Asistida del Sistema Nacional de Salud.: Criterios para la utilización de los recursos del Sistema Nacional de Salud Espahol en Técnicas de Reproducción Humana Asistida. Rev Iberoam Fertil 2002;19(1):5-31.
15. Agarwal SK, Buyalos RP.: Clomiphene citrate with intrauterine insemination: is it effective therapy in women above the age 35 years?. Fertil Steril 1996; 65(4): 759-63.
16. Sahakyan M, Harlow BL, Hornstein MD.: Influence of age, diagnosis, and cycle number on pregnancy rates with gonadotropin-induced controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. Ferti Steril 1999; 72 (3): 500-4.
17. Nulsen JC, Walsh S, Dumez S, Metzger DA.: A randomized and longitudinal study of human menopausal gonadotropin with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 780-6.
18. Arici A, Byrd W, Bradshaw K, Kutteh WH, Marshburn P, Carr BR.: Evaluetion of clomiphene citrate and human chorionic gonadotropin treatment: m a prospective, randomized, crossover study during intrauterine insemination cycles. Fertil steril 1994; 61: 314-18.
19. Cohlen BJ, te Velde ER, van Kooij RJ, Looman CW, Habbema JD.: Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treating male subfertility: a controlled study. 1998; Hum Reprod; 13: 1553-8.
20. Guzick DS, Carson SA, Coutifaris C, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, Steinkampf MP, et al.: Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 177-83.
21. Deaton JL, Gibson M, Blackmer KM, Nakajima ST Badger GJ, Brumsted JR.: A randomized, controlled trial of clomiphene citrate and intrauterine insemination in couples with unexplained infertility or surgically corrected endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1990; 54: 1083-8.
22. Montanaro GM, Kruger TF, Coetzee K, Smith K, Van Der Merwe JP, Lombard CJ.: Stepwise regression analysis to study male and female factors impacting on pregnancy rate in an intrauterine insemination programme. Andrologia 2001; 33: 135-41.
23. Hughes EG.: The effedtiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1865-72.
24. Hauser R, Yogev L, Botchan A, Lessing JB, Paz G, Yavetz H.: Intrauterine insemination in male factor sub-fertility: significance of sperm motility and morphology assessed by strict criteria. Andrologia 2001; 33:13-7.
25. Gunalp S, Onculoglu C, Curgan T, Kruger TF, Lombard CJ.: A study of semen parameters with emphasis on sperm morphology in a fertile population: an attempt to develop clinical thresholds. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 110-14.
26. Lindheim SR, Barad DH, Zinger M, Witt b, Amin H, Cohen B, et al.: Abnormal sperm morphology is highly predictive of pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. J Assist reprod Genet 1996; 13:569-72.
27. Matorras R, Corcostegui B, Perez C, Mandiola M, Mendoza R, Rodriguez-Escudero FJ.: Sperm morphology analysis (strict criteria) in male infertility is not a prognostic factor in intrauterine insemination with husband's sperm. Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 608-11.
28. Karabius DS, Gelety TJ.: The impact of sperm morphology evaluated by strict criteria on intrauterine insemination success. Fertil steril 1997; 67: 536-41.
29. Valbuena D, Simon C, Romero JL, Remohhí J, Pellicer A.: Factors responsible for multiple pregnancies after ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination with gonadotropins. J Assit Reprod Genet 19896; 13:663-8.
30. Pasqualotto EB, Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Petrauskis C, Nelson DR, Agarwal A.: Risk factors for multiple gestation inwomen undrgoing intrauterine insemination with ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 1999; 72:613-8.
31. Dickey RP, Taylor SN, Lu PY, sartor BM, Rye PH, Pyrzak R.: Relationship of follicules numbers and estradiol levels to multiple implantation in 3,608 intrauterine insemination cycles. Fertil Steril 2001; 75:69-78.