Estimation of logatom intelligibility with the STI method for polish speech transmitted via communication channels

Archives of Acoustics

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 555-562

  Brachmansk S ^a  

^a WROCLAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Logatom intelligibility; Speech intelligibility; Speech quality; Speech transmission index; STI

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NOISE; COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY); FORMAL LANGUAGES; HEARING AIDS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS; QUALITY OF SERVICE; SEMANTICS; SPEECH TRANSMISSION;

AUDITORY THRESHOLD; LOGATOM INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH QUALITY; SPEECH TRANSMISSION INDEX (STI);

SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

EID: 10644227006     PISSN: 01375075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ANDERSON W.B., KALB J.T., English verification of STI method for estimating speech intelligibility of a communications channel, JASA, 81, 6, 1982-1985 (1987).
2. BRACHMAŃSKI S., Effect of additive interference on speech transmission, Archives of Acoustics, 27, 2, 95-108 (2002).
3. BRACHMAŃSKI S., Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) as measure of Polish speech transmission quality [in Polish], Doctoral Dissertation, Wrocław 1982.
4. BRACHMAŃSKI S., Subjective measurement of speech transmission quality in telecommunication chanels [in Polish], Proceedings of 46-th Open Seminar on Acoustics, Kraków-Zakopane, 99-104, 1999.
5. BRACHMAŃSKI S., ZUR J., Application of RASTI system for quality evaluation of Polish speech transmission in analog communication system [in Polish], Proceedings of 44-th Open Seminar on Acoustics OSA'97, Gdańsk, 177-182, 1997.
6. BRADLEY J., Predictors of speech intelligibility in rooms, JASA, 80, 3, 837-845, 1986.
7. FARINA A., Acoustic quality of theatres: correlations between experimental measures and subjective evaluations, Applied Acoustic, 62, 889-916 (2001).
8. HOUTGAST T., STEENEKEN H.J.M., The Modulation Transfer Function in room acoustics as a predictor of speech intelligibility, Acustica, 28, 66-73 (1973).
9. HOUTGAST T., STEENEKEN H.J.M., Predicting speech intelligibility in rooms from the Modulation Transfer Function. I. General room acoustics, Acustica, 46, 60-72 (1980).
10. JACOB K.D., BIRKLE T.K., ICKLER C.B., Accurate prediction of speech intelligibility without the use of in-room measurements, J. Audio Eng. Soc., 39, 4, 232-242 (1991).
11. MACKIE K., Assesment of evaluation measures for processed speech, Speech Comm., 6, 309-316 (1987).
12. MAJEWSKI W., MYŚLECKI W., BAŚCIUK K., BRACHMAŃSKI S., Application of modified logatom intelligibility test in telecommunications, audiometry and room acoustics, Proceedings 9-th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference Melecon'98, Tel-Aviv, Israel, 25-28, 1998.
13. MAJEWSKI W., MYŚLECKI W., BRACHMAŃSKI S., Methods of assessing the quality of speech transmission, 47-th Open Seminar on Acoustics, Rzeszow, 66-75, 2000.
14. MAJEWSKI W., ZALEWSKI J., Articulation index of polish speech [in Polish], Doctoral Dissertation, Wrocław 1964.
15. MAPP P., A comparison between STI and RASTI Speech Intelligibility Measurement Systems, The 111-th AES Convention, Los Angeles, Preprint 5668, 2002.
16. MAPP P., Limitations of current sound system intelligibility verification techniques, The 111-th AES Convention, Los Angeles, Preprint 5668, 2002.
17. SOTSCHEK J., Methoden zur Messung der Sprachgüte I: Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Satz- und der Wortverständlichkeit, Der Fernmelde Ingenieur, 10, 1-31 (1976).
18. SOTSCHEK J., Sprachverständlichkeit bei additiven Störungen, Acustica, 57, 257-267 (1985).
19. STEENEKEN H.J.M., HOUTGAST T., A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality, JASA, 67, 1, 318-326 (1980).
20. STEENEKEN H.J.M., HOUTGAST T., Mutual dependence of the octave-band weights in predicting speech intelligibility, Speech Communication, 28, 109-123 (1999).
21. STEENEKEN H.J.M., HOUTGAST T., Phoneme-group specific octave-band weights in predicting speech intelligibility. Speech Communication, 38, 399-411 (2002).
22. STEENEKEN H.J.M., HOUTGAST T., Validation of revised STI method, Speech Communication, 38, 413-425 (2002).
23. TISSEYRE A., MOULINIER A., ROUARD Y., Intelligibility in various rooms: Comparing its assessment by (RA) STI measurement with a direct measurement procedure, Applied Acoustic, 53, 1-3, 179-191 (1998).
24. WIJNGAARDEN S.J., STEENEKEN H.J.M., Objective prediction of speech intelligibility at high ambient noise level using the speech transmission index, Proc. of the 6-th Europeen Conf. on Speech Comm. and Technol., Eurospeech 99, Budapest, 6, 2639-2642, 1999.
25. ANSI S 3.2, Methods for measuring the intelligibility of speech over communication systems, 1989.
26. ANSI S 3.5, Methods for the calculation of the speech intelligibility index (SII), 1997.
27. CCITT, Quality of telephone transmission, local networks and telephone sets [in Polish], CCITT's Green Book, Vol. V, WKił, Warsaw 1976.
28. ISO/TR 4870, Acoustics - The construction and calibration of speech intelligibility tests, 1991.
29. IEC 60268-16, Sound system equipment - Part16: Objective rating of speech intelligibility by speech transmission index, Ed. 3, International Electrotechnical Commission, 2003.
30. ITU-T Recommendation P.861, Objective quality measurement of telephone-band (300-3400 Hz) speech codecs, 1996.
31. ITU-T Recommendation P.862, Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ), an objective method for end-to-end speech quality assessment of narrowband telephone networks and speech codecs, 2003.
32. Polish Standard PN-EN-60268-16, Sound system equipment - Part16: Objective rating of speech intelligibility by speech transmission index, 2002.
33. Polish Standard PN-90/T-05100, Analog telephone chains. requirements and methods of measuring logatom articulation [in Polish], 1990.
34. Speech transmission meter type 3361, instruction manual, Brüel & Kjaer.
35. Measuring speech intelligibility using DIRAC, Technical Note TN002, Brüel & Kjaer, 2003.