Oviposition preference and larval performance of a rare bud-galling sawfly (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) on willow in northern Arizona

Environmental Entomology

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 700-708

  Ferrier, Sharon M ^a   Price, Peter W ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Euura sp.; Plant vigor; Population dynamics; Preference performance linkage; Salix scouleriana

Indexed keywords

GALL INSECT; HOST PREFERENCE; LARVAL DEVELOPMENT; OVIPOSITION; PLANT-INSECT INTERACTION; SURVIVAL;

ARIZONA; NORTH AMERICA; SAN FRANCISCO MOUNTAIN; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EUURA; HYMENOPTERA; SALIX; SALIX SCOULERIANA; TENTHREDINIDAE;

EID: 10644226882     PISSN: 0046225X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/0046-225X-33.3.700     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Benson, R. B. 1963. Wear and damage of sawfly saws (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae). Notulae Entomol. 43: 137-138.
2. Coley, P. D. and T. A. Kursar. 1996. Anti-herbivore defenses of young tropical leaves: Physiological constraints and ecological trade-offs, pp. 305-336. In S. S. Mulkey, R. L. Chazdon, and A. P. Smith (eds.), Tropical forest plant ecophysiology. Chapman & Hall, New York.
3. Conover, W. J., and R. L. Iman. 1981. Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am. Stat. 35: 124-129.
4. Cornell, H. V., and B. A. Hawkins. 1995. Survival patterns and mortality sources of herbivorous insects: some demographic trends. Am. Nat. 145: 563-593.
5. Courtney, S. P., and T. T. Kibota. 1990. Mother doesn't know best: selection of hosts by ovipositing insects, pp. 161-188. In E. A. Bernays (ed.), Insect-plant interactions, vol. 2. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
6. Craig, T. P., P. W. Price, and J. K. Itami. 1989. A strong relationship between oviposition preference and larval performance in a shoot-galling sawfly. Ecology. 70: 1691-1699.
7. Craig, T. P., J. K. Itami, and P. W. Price. 1990. The window of vulnerability of a shoot-galling sawfly to attack by a parasitoid. Ecology. 71: 1471-1482.
8. Fritz, R. S., B. A. Crabb, and C. G. Hochwender. 2003. Preference and performance of a gall-inducing sawfly: plant vigor, sex, gall traits and phenology. Oikos. 102: 601-613.
9. Higton, H. N., and D. J. Mabberley. 1994. A willow gall from the galler's point of view, pp. 301-312. In M.A.J. Williams (ed.), Plant galls: organisms, interactions, populations, vol. 49. Clarendon, Oxford, UK.
10. Kearney, T. H., and R. H. Peebles. 1942. Flowering plants and ferns of Arizona. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
11. Kohlemainen, J., H. Roininen, R. Julkunen-Tiitto, and J. Tahvanainen. 1994. Importance of phenolic glycosides in host selection of the shoot galling sawfly, Euura amerinae, on Salix pentandra. J. Chem. Ecol. 20: 2455-2466.
12. Kokkonen, K. 2000. Mixed significance of plant vigor: two species of galling Pontania in a hybridizing willow complex. Oikos. 90: 97-106.
13. Kopelke, J.-P. 1989. Der taxonomische Status von Pontania dolichura (Thompson 1871) (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae). Senckenb. Biol. 70: 271-279.
14. Kopelke, J. P. 1990. Wirtsspezifitat als Differenzierungskriterium bei Gallenbildenden Blattwespenarten der Gattung Pontania O. Costa (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae: Nematinae). Mitt. Dtsch. Ges. Allg. Agnew. Entomol. 7: 527-534.
15. Kopelke, J.-P. 1999. Gallenzeugende blattwespen Europas - taxonomische grundlagen, biologie und ökologie (Tenthredinidae: Nematinae: Euura, Phyllocolpa, Pontania). Cour. Forschungsinst. Senckenb. 212: 1-183.
16. Kopelke, J.-P. 2001. Die artengruppen von Euura mucronata und E. laeta in Europa (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae, Nematinae). Senkenb. Biol. 81: 191-225.
17. McCalla, D. R., M. K. Genthe, and W. Hovanitz. 1962. Chemical nature of an insect gall growth factor. Plant Physiol. 37: 98-103.
18. McDougall, W. B. 1973. Seed plants of northern Arizona. Museum of Northern Arizona, Flagstaff, AZ.
19. Nyman, T. 2000. Phylogeny and ecological evolution of gall-inducing sawflies (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae). Ph.D. dissertation. University of Joensuu, Joensuu, Finland.
20. Nyman, T. 2002. The willow bud galler Euura mucronata Hartig (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae): one polyphage or many monophages? Heredity. 88: 288-295.
21. Preszler, R. W., and P. W. Price. 1988. Host quality and sawfly populations: a new approach to life table analysis. Ecology. 69: 2012-2020.
22. Price, P. W. 1989. Clonal development of coyote willow, Salix exigua (Salicaceae), and attack by the shoot-galling sawfly, Euura exiguae (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae). Environ. Entomol. 18: 61-68.
23. Price, P. W. 1991. The plant vigor hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos. 62: 244-251.
24. Price, P. W. 1992. Evolution and ecology of gall-inducing sawflies, pp. 208-224. In J. D. Shorthouse and O. Rohfritsch (eds.), Biology of insect-induced galls, Oxford University, New York.
25. Price, P. W. 1994. Phylogenetic constraints, adaptive syndromes, and emergent properties: from individuals to population dynamics. Res. Popul. Ecol. 36: 3-14.
26. Price, P. W. 2003. Macroevolutionary theory on macroecological patterns. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
27. Price, P. W., and T. P. Craig. 1984. Life history, phenology, and survivorship of a stem-galling sawfly, Euura lasiolepis (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae), on the arroyo willow, Salix lasiolepis, in northern Arizona. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 77: 712-719.
28. Price, P. W., and K. M. Clancy. 1986. Interactions among three trophic levels: gall size and parasitoid attack. Ecology. 67: 1593-1600.
29. Price, P. W. and H. Roininen. 1993. The adaptive radiation in gall induction, pp. 229-257. In M. R. Wagner and K. F. Raffa (eds.), Sawfly life history adaptations to woody plants. Academic, San Diego, CA.
30. Price, P. W., H. Roininen, and J. Tahvanainen. 1987. Why does the bud-galling sawfly, Euura mucronata, attack long shoots? Oecologia (Berl.). 74: 1-6.
31. Price, P. W., H. Roininen, and T. Ohgushi. 1999. Comparative plant-herbivore interactions involving willows and three gall-inducing sawfly species in the genus Pontania (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae). Ecoscience. 6: 41-50.
32. Roininen, H., J. Vuorinen, J. Tahvanainen, and R. Julkunen-Titto. 1993. Host preference and allozyme differentiation in shoot galling sawfly, Euura atra. Evolution. 47: 300-308.
33. Roininen, H., P. W. Price, R. Julkunen-Tiitto, and J. Tahvanainen. 1999. Oviposition stimulant for a galling sawfly, Euura lasiolepis, on willow is a phenolic glucoside. J. Chem. Ecol. 25: 943-953.
34. Smith, D. R. 1979. Suborder Symphyta, pp. 3-137. In K. V. Krombein, P. D. Hurd, D. R. Smith, and B. D. Burks (eds.), Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
35. Smith, E. L. 1968. Biosystematics and morphology of Symphyta. I. Stem-galling Euura of the California region and a new female genitalic nomenclature. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 61: 1389-1407.
36. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd ed. W. H. Freeman, New York.
37. Stein, S. J., P. W. Price, T. P. Craig, and J. K. Itami. 1994. Dispersal of a galling sawfly: implications for studies of insect population dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 666-676.
38. Thompson, J. N. 1988. Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in a phytophagous insects. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 47: 3-14.
39. Woods, J. O., T. G. Carr, P. W. Price, L. E. Stevens, and N. S. Cobb. 1996. Growth of coyote willow and the attack and survival of a mid-rib galling sawfly, Euura sp. Oecologia (Berl.). 108: 714-722.
40. Zar, J. H. 1996. Biostatistical analysis, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.