Penile prosthesis, sexual satisfaction and representation of male erotic value

Sexual and Relationship Therapy

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 379-392

  Kempeneers, Philippe ^a,b,d   Andrianne, Robert ^c,d   Mormont, Christian ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b Alexians' Hospital   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^d Soc des Sexologues Univ Belgique   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Couple; Erectile disorder; Penile prosthesis; Sexual communication; Sexual satisfaction; Social representation; Virility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; EROTISM; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PENIS ERECTION; PENIS PROSTHESIS; SELF CONCEPT; SENSATION; SEXUALITY;

EID: 10644221206     PISSN: 14681994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14681990412331297983     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anafarta, K., Yaman, O. & Aydos, K. (1998). Clinical experience with Dynaflex penile prosthesis in 120 patients. 52(6), 1098-1100.
2. Candela, J.V. & Hellestrom, W.J. (1996). Three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: a comparison of the penoscrotal and infrabubic surgical approaches. Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society, 148(7), 296-301.
3. Collins, G.F. & Kinder, B.N. (1984). Adjustment following surgical implantation of a penile prosthesis: a critical overview. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 10, 255-271.
4. Goldstein, I., Bertero, E.B., Kaufman, J.M., Witten, F.R., Hubbard, J.G., Fitch, W.P., et al. (1993). Early experience with the first pre-connected three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis: the Mentor Alpha-1. 150(6), 1814-1818.
5. Holloway, F.B. & Farah, R.N. (1997). Intermediate term assessment of the reliability, function and patient satisfaction with AMS 700 Ultrex penile prosthesis. Journal of Urology, 157(5), 1687-1691.
6. Kempeneers, P., Andrianne, R. & Mormont, C. (1992). Evaluation par questionnaire des inconvénients liés aux prothèses péniennes chez 25 implantés [Penile prosthesis: problems of use in a sample of 25 recipients]. Andrologie, 2, 130-133.
7. Kempeneers, P., Andrianne, R. & Mormont, C. (1994a). La prothèse pénienne: contrariétés d'une virilité artificielle [Penile prosthesis: the frustrations of artificial virility]. 3(13), 26-30.
8. Kempeneers, P., Andrianne, R. & Mormont, C. (1994b). La prothèse pénienne dans le traitement de l'impuissance: la décision du patient [penile prosthesis in the treatment of impotence: patient's decision]. Cahiers de Sexologie Clinique, 20(124), 31-36.
9. Kempeneers, P., Andrianne, R., Mormont, C., Jeanmart, F. & Blochousse, L. (2001). Prothèse pénienne: taille du pénis implanté et dimensions de la virilité [Penile prosthesis: size of the implanted penis and dimensions of virility]. Cahiers de Sexologie Clinique, 27(149), 18-27.
10. Kempeneers, P., Louwette, S., Mormont, C. & Doudali, P. (2000). Adaptation et validation française du Sexual Irrationality Questionnaire (SIQ) de McCormick et Jordan [french adaptation and validation of McCormick and Jordan's Sexual Irrationality Questionnaire (SIQ)]. Revue Francophone de Clinique Comportementale et Cognitive, 5 3), 5-18.
11. Kupeli, S., Aydos, K. & Budak, M. (1999). Penile implants in erectile impotence. The importance of clinical experience on outcome. European Journal of Urology, 36(2), 129-135.
12. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55.
13. McCormick, N.B. & Jordan, T.J. (1986). Thoughts that destroy intimacy: irrational beliefs about relationships and sexuality. In W. Dryden & P. Tower (Eds), Rational-emotive Therapy: recent developments in theory and practice. Bristol: Institute for RET.
14. McLaren, R.H. & Barrett, D.M. (1992). Patient and partner satisfaction with the AMS 700 penile prosthesis. Journal of Urology, 147(1), 62-65.
15. Montorsi, F., Rigatti, P., Carmignani, G., Corbu, C., Campo, B., Ordesi G., et al. (2000). AMS three-piece inflatable implants for erectile dysfunction: a long-term multi-institutional study in 200 consecutive patients. European Journal of Urology, 37(1), 50-55.
16. Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. In J.P. Forgas (Ed.), Social cognition: perspectives on everyday understanding London: Academic Press.
17. Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211-250.
18. Mulcahy, J.J. (2000). Surgical management of penile prosthesis complications. International Journal of Impotence Research, 12(4), 108-111.
19. Porena, M., Mearini, L., Mearini, E., Marzi, M. & Zucchi, A. (1999). Penile prosthesis implantation and couple's satisfaction. Urologia Internationalis, 63(3), 185-187.
20. Schover, L.R. (1989). Sex therapy for penile prosthesis recipient. 16, 91-98.
21. Schover, L.R. & Von Eschenbach, A.C. (1985). Sex therapy and the penile prosthesis: a synthesis. 11, 57-66.
22. Tefilli, M.V., Dubocq, F., Rajpurkar, A., Gheiler, E.L., Tiguert, R., Barton, C., et al. (1998). Assessment of psychosexual adjustment after insertion of inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology, 52(6), 1106-1112.
23. Wilson, S.K., Cleves, M.A. & Delk, J.R. (1996). Ultrex cylinders: problems with uncontrolled lengthening. Journal of Urology, 155(1), 135-137.