It doesn't matter whether onset and rime predicts reading better than phoneme awareness does or vice versa

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 41-46

  Bryant, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NOTE; PHONETICS; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROGNOSIS; READING; SEMANTICS;

AWARENESS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; PROGNOSIS; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 10644220485     PISSN: 00220965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jecp.2002.2672     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1978). Difficulties in auditory organisation as a possible cause of reading backwardness. Nature, 271, 746-747.
2. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983a). Categorising sounds and learning to read: a causal connection. Nature, 301, 419-21.
3. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P.E. (1983b).Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4. Bryant, P. (1998). Sensitivity to onset and rhyme does predict young children's reading: A comment on Muter, Hulme, Snowling and Taylor (1997). Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 29-37.
5. Bryant, P., & Bradley, L. (1985). Children's reading problems. Oxford: Blackwell.
6. Bryant, P. E., MacLean, M., Bradley, L. L., & Crossland. (1990). Rhyme and alliteration, phoneme detection, and learning to read. Developmental Psychology, 26, 429-438.
7. Frith, U. (1985) Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. Patterson, M. Coltheart and J. Marshall (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 301-330. London: Erlbaum.)
8. Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M., & Taylor, S. (1998). Segmentation, not rhyming, predicts early progress in learning to read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 3-27.
9. Taft, M. (1991) Reading and the mental lexicon. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.