Reliability of a new algorithm for automatic mode switching from DDDR to DDIR pacing mode in sinus node disease patients with chronotropic incompetence and recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 19, Issue 11 II, 1996, Pages 1719-1723

  Ricci, R ^a,e   Puglisi, A ^a   Azzolini, P ^a   Spampinato, A ^b   Pignalberi, C ^b   Bellocci, F ^b   Adinolfi, E ^c   Dini, P ^c   Cavaglia S ^d   De Seta, F ^d  

^a FATEBENEFRATELLI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b Clinica Villa Tiberia   (Italy)

^c SAN CAMILLO FORLANINI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^d MEDTRONIC INC   (United States)

^e NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

automatic mode switching; chronotropic incompetence; DDDR pacing mode; DDIR pacing mode; paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; sinus node disease

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CHRONOTROPISM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY MONITORING; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART PACING; HEART RATE; HOLTER MONITORING; HUMAN; MALE; PAROXYSMAL SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELIABILITY; SINUS NODE DISEASE;

EID: 10544219603     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03213.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Santini M, Alexidou G, Ansalone G. Relation of prognosis in sick sinus syndrome to age, conduction defect and modes of permanent cardiac pacing. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65:729-735.
2. Sutton R. DDDR pacing. PACE 1990; 13:385-387.
3. Ricci R, Puglisi A, Azzolini P, et al. Haemodynamic benefits of DDIR pacing. Italian multicentre trial. Eur JCPE 1993; 3:212-219.
4. Barold SS. The DDI and DDIR modes of cardiac pacing. Characteristics and indications. Cardiostimolazione 1993; 11:317-325.
5. Sutton R, Markowitz T. Toward physiological stimulation in sinus node disease. Eur JCPE 1994; 4:126-131.
6. Irwin M, Harris L, Cameron D, et al. DDI pacing: Indications, exceptions, and follow-up. PACE 1994; 17:274-279.
7. Barold SS, Mond HG. Optimal antibradycardia pacing in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias: Role of fallback and automatic mode switching mechanism. In SS Barold, J Mugica (eds.): New Perspective in Cardiac Pacing 3. Mount Kisco, NY, Futura Publishing Co., 1993, pp. 483-518.
8. Den Dulk K, Dijkman B, Pieterse M, et al. Initial experience with mode switching in a dual sensor, dual chamber pacemaker in patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias. PACE 1994; 17: 1900-1907.
9. Lau C-P, Tai YT, Fong PC, et al. Atrial arrhythmias management with sensor controlled atrial refractory period and automatic mode switching in patients with minute ventilation sensing dual chamber rate adaptive pacemakers. PACE 1992; 15: 1504-1510.
10. Levine PA, Bornzin GA, Barlow J, et al. A new automode switch algorithm for supraventricular tachycardias. PACE 1994; 17:1895-1899.
11. Ovsyshcher IE, Katz A, Bondy C. Initial experience with a new algorithm for supraventricular tachycardias. PACE 1994; 17:1908-1912.
12. Proclemer A, Facchin D, Feruglio GA, et al. Il mode switch nel nuovo sistema Medtronic Therai: Applicazioni e dati clinici preliminari. In E Antonioli, E Ferrara (eds.): La Stimulazione Fisiologica Doppia Camera. Stato Attuale e Prospettive." Ferrara, 22-23 giugno, 1995, pp. 111-114.
13. Mond H, Strathmore N, Hunt P, et al. Bipolar and unipolar permanent pacing leads. Which is superior? PACE 1989; 12:678.
14. Zardo F, Nicolosi G, Burelli C, et al. Unipolar versus bipolar permanent endocardial pacing: Advantages and disadvantages. Cardiostimolazione 1990; 8:203-209.
15. Wood MA, Moskovljevic P, Stambler BS, et al. Comparison of bipolar atrial electrogram amplitude in sinus rhythm, atrial fibrillation, and atrial flutter. PACE 1996; 19:150-156.