Temperature modulation of pressure ulcer formation: Using a swine model

Wounds

Volumn 16, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 336-343

  Iaizzo, Paul A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; ANESTHETIC AGENT; ATROPINE; BUPRENORPHINE; THIOPENTAL;

CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE MODEL; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG EFFECT; EDEMA; ERYTHEMA; HEALTH STATUS; HIGH TEMPERATURE; HISTOLOGY; LABORATORY; MONITORING; NONHUMAN; PRESSURE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SWINE; TEMPERATURE; TIME; TISSUE INJURY; ULCEROGENESIS; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 10444274154     PISSN: 10447946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Singer AJ, McClain SA. Development of a porcine excisional wound model. Acad Emergency Med 2003;10:1029-33.
2. Kokate JY, Leland KJ, Held AM, et al. Temperature-modulated pressure ulcers: A porcine model. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1995;76:666-73.
3. Iaizzo PA, Kveen GL, Kokate JY, Leland KJ, Hansen GL, Sparrow EM. Prevention of pressure ulcers by focal cooling: Histological assessment in a porcine model. WOUNDS 1995;7(5):161-9.
4. Hansen GL, Sparrow EM, Kammamuri R, Iaizzo PA. Assessing wound severity using color and infrared imaging of reactive hyperemia. Wound Repair Regen 1996;4:386-92.
5. Hansen GL, Sparrow EM, Kokate JY, Leland KJ, Iaizzo PA. Wound status evaluation using color image processing. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997;16:78-86.
6. Kokate JY, Leland KJ, Sparrow EM, Iaizzo PA. Critical thresholds for pressure ulcer formation in a porcine model. WOUNDS 1997;9(4):111-21.
7. Hansen GL, Sparrow EM, Kalieta AL, Iaizzo PA. Using infrared imaging to assess the severity of pressure ulcers. WOUNDS 1998;10(2):43-53.
8. Hollander DA, Erli HJ, Theisen A, Falk S, Kreck T, Müller S. Standardized qualitative evaluation of scar tissue properties in an animal wound healing model. Wound Repair Regen 2003;11:150-7.
9. Sullivan TP, Eaglstein WH, Davis SC, Mertz P. The pig as a model for human wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 2001;9:66-76.
10. Moritz AR, Henriques FC. Studies of thermal injury: Relative importance of time and surface temperature in causation of cutaneous burns. Am J Pathol 1947;23:695-720.
11. Kosiak M. Etiology of decubitus ulcers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1961;42:19-29.
12. Dinsdale SM. Decubitus ulcers in swine: Light and electron microscopy study of pathogenesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1973;54:51-6.
13. Dinsdale SM. Decubitus ulcers: Role of pressure and friction in causation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1974;55:147-52.
14. Daniel RK, Priest DL, Wheatley DC. Etiologic factors in pressure sores: An experimental model. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1981;62:492-8.
15. Witkowski JA, Parish LC. Histopathology of the decubitus ulcer. J Am Acad Dermatol 1982;6:1014-21.
16. Patterson RP, Fisher SV. Pressure and temperature patterns under the ischial tuberosities. Bull Prosthet Res Fall 1980;10:5-11.
17. Ruch RC, Patton HD (eds). Physiology and Biophysics, Edition 19. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1965:1046.
18. Maklebust J. Pressure ulcers: Etiology and prevention. Nurs Clin North Am 1987;22(2):359-77.
19. Hausman LL. Cost containment through reducing pressure ulcers. Nurs Manag 1994;25(7):88R, 88T, 88V.
20. Gokoo C, Burhop K. A comparative study of wound dressings on full-thickness wounds in micropigs. Decubitus 1993;6(5):42-3, 46, 48 passim.
21. Le KM, Madsen BL, Barth PW, Ksander GA, Angell JB, Vistnes LM. An in-depth look at pressure sores using monolithic silicon pressure sensors. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;74(6):745-56.
22. Martin GR, Peacock EE. Current perspectives in wound healing. In: Cohen IK, Diegelmann RF, Lindblad WJ (eds). Wound Healing. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co., 1992:1-4.