|
|
Volumn 116, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 205-212
|
|
Comparison of amphiphilic polyurethane nanoparticles to nonionic surfactants for flushing phenanthrene from soil
a
|
|
Author keywords
Amphiphilic polymer; Desorption; Nanoparticles; Phenanthrene; Sorption; Surfactant flushing
|
|
Indexed keywords
AMPHIPHILIC POLYURETHANE (APU);
CROSSLINKING POLYMERIZATION;
PHENANTHRENE;
URETHANE ACRYLATE NONIONOMER (UAN);
AQUIFERS;
AROMATIC COMPOUNDS;
CROSSLINKING;
EXTRACTION;
FLOW OF FLUIDS;
NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS;
POLYMERIZATION;
SOILS;
SORPTION;
SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS;
SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);
POLYURETHANES;
AMPHOPHILE;
ION;
NANOPARTICLE;
PHENANTHRENE;
SURFACTANT;
TRITON X 100;
URETHAN DERIVATIVE;
FLUSHING;
PHENANTHRENE;
REMEDIATION;
SOIL POLLUTION;
SURFACTANT;
ARTICLE;
CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS);
DETOXIFICATION;
EXTRACTION;
FLOWMETER;
FLUSHING;
POLYMERIZATION;
SOIL POLLUTION;
SYNTHESIS;
ADSORPTION;
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION;
NANOSTRUCTURES;
OCTOXYNOL;
PHENANTHRENES;
POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS;
POLYSORBATES;
POLYURETHANES;
SOIL POLLUTANTS;
SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS;
|
|
EID: 10444270162
PISSN: 03043894
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.08.031 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (24)
|
|
References (24)
|
