Oxygen-inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 316-323

  Suh, Byoung In ^a  

^a Bisco Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAMPHORQUINONE; GELATIN; NITROGEN; OXYGEN; POLYESTER; RESIN; WATER;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BOND; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; DECOMPOSITION; DENTISTRY; ESTHETICS; FILM; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; INSTRUMENTATION; IRRADIATION; LIGHT; MACHINE; SHEAR STRENGTH; SPECTROMETER; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME; ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 10444256423     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00060.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Wool RP. Polymer interfaces. Munich: Hanser, 1995:102-146.
2. Ruyter IE. Unpolymerized surface layers on sealants. Acta Odontol Scand 1981; 39:27-32.
3. Truffier-Boutry D, Place E, Devaux J, Leloup G. Interfacial layer characterization in dental composite. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30:74-77.
4. Reinhardt KJ. Bond strength of multi-cured composites. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1991; 46:529-532.
5. Velazquez E, Vaidyanathan J, Vaidyanathan TK, Houpt M, Shey Z, von Hagen S. Effect of primer solvent and curing mode on dentin shear bond strength and interface morphology. Quintessence Int 2003; 34:548-555.
6. Kupiec KA, Barkmeier WW. Laboratory evaluation of surface treatments of composite repair. Oper Dent 1996; 21:59-62.
7. Finger WJ, Lee KS, Podszun W. Monomers with low oxygen inhibition as enamel/dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 256-261.
8. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990; 69:1652-1658.
9. Munksgaard EC, Irie M, Asmussen E. Dentin-polymer bond promoted by gluma and various resins. J Dent Res 1985; 64:1409-1411.
10. Eliades GC, Caputo AA. The strength of layering technique in visible light-cured composites. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 31-38.
11. Li J. Effects of surface properties on bond strength between layers of newly cured dental composites. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24:358-360.
12. 2-inhibited layer necessary for bonding of composite resin? J Dent Res 2003; 82:B-237. (Abstr)
13. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, et al. The micro-tensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1:299-309.
14. Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Combe EC, Simpson CH, Nunes MF. Effect of restorative and adhesive curing methods on dentin bond strengths. Am J Dent 2001; 14:137-140.
15. Schiltz MY, Cincione F, De Rijk W, Suh BI. Bond strength of single bottle adhesives to self-cured composites on dentin. J Dent Res 2000; 79(Spec Iss A):374. (Abstr)
16. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Miller MB. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part I. Bond strength and morphologic evidence. Am J Dent. (In press)
17. Suh BI, Feng L, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5:283-291.
18. King N, Tay F, Pashley DH, Yiu C, Toledano M. Incompatibility profiles of all-in-one adhesives. I. True vs apparent incompatibility. J Dent Res 2004; 83(Spec Iss A): Abstract 23. (Abstr)
19. Suh BI, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Ferrari M, Goracci C, Yiu C. Incompatibility profiles of all-in-one adhesives. II. Contribution of oxygen inhibition. J Dent Res 2004; 83(Spec Iss A): Abstract 24. (Abstr)