Elements of a representation framework for performance-based design

Building and Environment

Volumn 39, Issue 8 SPEC. ISS., 2004, Pages 969-988

  Suter, Georg ^a   Mahdavi, Ardeshir ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Integrated design systems; Performance based design

Indexed keywords

MAPPING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

INTEGRATED DESIGN SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN; SPATIAL PARTITIONING;

BUILDINGS;

BUILDINGS; MAPPING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; PARTITIONING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

EID: 10444243100     PISSN: 03601323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.01.021     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Lam KP, Wong NH, Feriady H. A study of the use of performance-based simulation tools for building design and evaluation in Singapore. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference, International Building Performance Simulation Association, Kyoto, Japan; 1999. p. 675-82.
2. Mahdavi A, Feurer S, Redlein A, Suter G. An inquiry into the building performance simulation tools usage by architects in Austria. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference, International Building Performance Simulation Association, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; 2003. p. 777-84.
3. Hand JW, Hensen JLM. Recent experiences and developments in the training of simulationists. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference, International Building Performance Simulation Association, Madison WI, USA; 1995. p. 346-53.
4. Augenbroe G. Integrated building performance evaluation in the early design stages. Building and Environment 1992;27(2):149-61.
5. Mahdavi A. SEMPER: a new computational environment for simulation-based building design assistance. In: Proceedings of the 1996 International Symposium of CIB W67 (Energy and mass flows in the life cycle of buildings), Vienna, Austria; 1996. p. 467-72.
6. Papamichael K, LaPorta J, Chauvet H. Building Design Advisor: automated integration of multiple simulation tools. Automation in Construction 1997;6(4):341-52.
7. Pelletret R, Keilholz W. Coupling CAD tools and building simulation evaluators. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference, International Building Performance Simulation Association, Kyoto, Japan; 1999. p. 1197-202.
8. Sun M, Parand F. Integration of CAD, product model and distributed building component databases. In: Proceedings of Product and Process Modelling in the Building Industry Conference, Building Research Establishment, Watford, England; 1998. p. 487-95.
9. Suter G, Mahdavi A. Generation and communication of design information: a building performance simulation perspective. In: Proceedings of Fourth Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning, Maastricht, The Netherlands; 1998.
10. Eastman C. Building product models. Computer environments supporting design and construction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1999.
11. Björk B-C. A conceptual model of spaces, space boundariesand enclosing structures. Automation in Construction 1992; 1(3): 193-214.
12. Ekholm A, Fridquist S. A concept of space for building classification, product modelling and design. Automation in Construction 2000;9(3):315-28.
13. International Alliance for Interoperability (IAI). IFC technical guide; 2000.
14. Zamanian MK, Fenves S, Gursoz EL. Representing spatial abstractions of constructed facilities. Building and Environment 1992;27(2):221-30.
15. Güting H. An introduction to spatial database systems. Very Large Databases Journal 1994;3:3 57-99.
16. Rosenman M, Gero J. Modeling multiple views of design objects in a collaborative CAD environment. Computer-Aided Design 1996;28(3):193-205.
17. Steadman JP. Architectural morphology: an introduction to the geometry of building plans. London, England: Pion; 1983.
18. Harada M. Discrete and continuous design exploration by direct manipulation. PhD thesis, Department of Architecture, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA; 1997.
19. Suter G. Computer-based representations for performance-based design. Habilitation thesis, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria; 2003.
20. Paoluzzi A, Sansoni C. Programming language or variational geometry. Computer-Aided Design 1992;24(7):349-66.
21. Mahdavi A, Mathew P. Synchronous generation of homologous representations in an active multi-aspect design environment. In: Proceedings Fourth International Conference, International Building Performance Simulation Association, Madison WI, USA; 1995. p. 522-28.
22. Physibel Voltra User Manual. Maldegem, Belgium; 2002.
23. Corney J, Lim T. 3D Modeling with ACTS. Stirling, United Kingdom: Saxe-Coburg Publications; 2001.