Active regenerative chatter suppression during boring manufacturing process

Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 153-158

  Mei, C ^a  

^a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Active control; Boring bar; Chatter suppression; Distributed model; Regenerative chatter; Wave approach

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS; ELASTIC MODULI; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STIFFNESS; THEOREM PROVING; VIBRATION MEASUREMENT;

ACTIVE CONTROL; BORING BAR; CHATTER SUPPRESSION; DISTRIBUTED MODEL; REGENERATIVE CHATTER; WAVE APPROACH;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 10444241059     PISSN: 07365845     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2004.07.011     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Merrit HE. Theory of self-excited machine-tool chatter. J Eng Ind 1965;87(4):447-54.
2. Kato S, Marui E. On the cause of regenerative chatter due to workpiece deflection. J Eng Ind 1974;96:179-86.
3. Tobias SA, Fishwick W. The chatter of lathe tools under orthogonal cutting conditions. J Eng Ind 1958; (July).
4. Rivin EI, Hang K. Improvement of machining conditions for slender parts by tuned dynamic stiffness of tool. Int J Mach Tool Des Res 1989;29:361-72.
5. Seifring L. Apparatus and Method for Tool Vibration Damping. US Patent, No. 5033340, 1991.
6. Kelson ZY, Hsueh WC. Suppression of chatter in inner-diameter cutting. Int J Ser C: Dyn Control Robotics Des Manuf 1996;39(1):25-36.
7. Hopkins DA. Vibration Damping Assembly. US Patent, No. 3938626, 1976.
8. Tarng YS, Kao JY, Lee EC. Chatter suppression in turning operations with a tuned vibration absorber. J Mater Process Technol 2000;105:55-60.
9. Tewani SG, Switzer TC, Walcott BL, Rouch KE. Active vibration control using an active dynamic absorber: experimental results. ASME Adv Robotics 1992;42:133-40.
10. Tewani SG, Rouch KE, Walcott BL. A study of cutting process stability of a boring bar with active dynamic absorber. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 1995;35(1):91-108.
11. Pratt J, Nayfeh AH. Active vibration control for chatter suppression. AIAA-97-1210, 623-33.
12. Lin SC, DeVor RE, Kapoor SG. The effects of variable speed cutting on vibration speed cutting on vibration control in face milling. ASME J Eng Ind 1990;112(1):1-11.
13. Zhang H, Ni J, Shi H. Machining chatter suppression by means of spindle speed variation - Part I, the numerical solution and Part II: experimental investigation. S.M. Wu Symposium on Manufacturing Science, vol. 1. 1994. p. 161-75.
14. Radulescu R, Kapoor SG, Devor RE. An investigation of variable spindle speed face milling for tool-work structures with complex dynamics, part 1 : simulation results and part 2: physical explanation. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 1997;119(3):266-80.
15. Sexton JS, Stone BJ. The stability of machining with continuously varying spindle speed. Ann CIRP 1978;27(1):321-6.
16. Smith S, Tlusty J. Stabilizing chatter by automatic spindle speed regulation. Ann CIRP 1992;41(1):433-6.
17. Smith S, Delio T. Sensor-based chatter detection and avoidance by spindle speed selection. ASME J Eng Ind 1992;114:486-92.
18. Sturos TJ, Sutherland JW, Moon KS, Liu D, Kashani AR. Application of an actively controlled magnetostrictive actuator to vibration abatement in the turning process. ASME Dyn Syst Control Div 1995;57(1):539-44.
19. Liu KJ, Rouch KE. Optimal cutting process stability in milling using active dynamic absorber. ASME Active Control Noise Vib 1992;38:275-83.
20. Shiraishi M, Yamanaka K, Fujita H. Optimal control of chatter in turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 1991;31(1):31-43.
21. Browing DR, Golioto I, Thompson NB. Active chatter control system for long-overhang boring bars. Proc SPIE 1997;3044:270-80.
22. Weck M, Verhaag E, Gather M. Adaptive control for face milling operations with strategies for avoiding chatter vibrations and for automatic cut distribution. Ann CIRP 1975;24(1):405-10.
23. Lago TL, Olsson S, Håkansson L, Claesson I. Performance of a chatter control system for turning and boring applications. Fourth GRACM congress on comp. mechanics. June 2002. p. 27-9.
24. Håkansson L, Claesson I, Sturesson PO, Lagö TL. Active control of chatter in turning. IMAC-XVII international modal analysis conference, February 1999. p. 1799-805.
25. Mitchell EE, Harrison E. Active machine tool controller requirements for noise attenuation. J Eng Ind 1974; (February): 261-37.
26. Mace BR, Jones RW. Feedback control of flexural waves in beams. J Struct Control 1997;3(1-2):89-98.
27. Mei C, Mace BR, Jones RW. Hybrid wave/mode active vibration control. J Sound Vib 2001;247(5):765-84.
28. Inman DJ. Eng Vib. Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.; 1994.
29. Mei C. Hybrid active vibration control of a distributed structure. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Auckland, New Zealand, 1998.
30. Altintas Y. Manufacturing automation: metal cutting mechanics, machine tool vibrations, and CNC design. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
31. Fehlberg E. Low-order classical runge-kutta formulas with stepsize control and their application to some heat transfer problems. NASA Technical Report 1969;R:315.
32. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT. Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing, 2nd Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.