Possibility of producing the event-ready two-photon polarization entangled state with normal photon detectors

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 4 A, 2003, Pages

  Xiang Bin, Wang ^a  

^a JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; LIGHT POLARIZATION; MATRIX ALGEBRA; OPTICAL BEAM SPLITTERS; OPTICAL PUMPING; OPTICS; PHOTODETECTORS; QUANTUM THEORY; VACUUM;

ENTANGLED STATE; PASSIVE LINEAR OPTICS; PHOTON DETECTORS; POLARIZING BEAM SPLITTERS; TWO PHOTON POLARIZATION;

PHOTONS;

EID: 10444229058     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
2. D. Bouwmeester, A. Ekert, and A. Zeilinger, The Physics of Quantum Information (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000).
3. M. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Press, Cambridge, 2000).
4. C. H. Bennet, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
5. D. Bouwmeester, J-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Nature (London) 390, 575 (1997)
6. S. I. Braunstein and H.J. Kimble, ibid. 394, 840 (1998)
7. D. Bouwmeester, J-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. Weinfurther, M. Zukowski, and A. Zeilinger, ibid. 394, 841 (1998).
8. A. Ekert, J.G. Rarity, P.R. Tapster, and G.M. Palma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991)
9. T. Jennewein et al., ibid. 84, 4729 (1999).
10. D. Gottesman and I.L. Chuang, Nature (London) 402, 390 (1999).
11. In the Innsbruck experiment [5], the polarized weak Gaussian beam created by the spontaneous parametric down conversion process i used to replace the maximum polarization entangled state. This polarized weak Gaussian beam can be regarded as the probabilistic two-photon EPR state. Consequently, the teleportation task there can only be done successfully with a small probability. Given the event-ready entanglement, the goal of deterministic quantum teleoperation can be done.
12. P.G. Kwiat, K. Mattle, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger, A.V. Sergienko, and Y.H. Shih, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4337 (1995).
13. M. Zukowski, A. Zeilinger, M.A. Horne, and A.K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4287 (1993).
14. Pieter Kok, e-print quant-ph/0102070.
15. H.F. Hofmann and S. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 147901 (2002).
16. X.B. Zou, K. Pahlke, and W. Mathis, Phys. Rev. A 66, 014102 (2002).
17. H. Lee, P. Kok, N.J. Cerf, and J.P. Dowling, Phys. Rev. A 65, 030101 (2002)
18. J. Fiurasek, Phys. Rev. A 65, 053818 (2002).
19. C. Brunel, B. Lounis, P. Tamarat, and M. Orrit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2722 (1999).
20. P. Michler, et al., Science 290, 2282 (2000).
21. C. Santori, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1502 (2001).
22. Z.J. Yuan, et al., Science 295, 102 (2002).
23. C. Santori, D. Fattal, J. Vuckovic, G.S. Solomon, and Y. Yamamoto, Nature (London) 419, 594 (2002).
24. J. Kim, S. Takeuchi, and Y. Yamamoto, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 902 (1999).
25. C. Sliwa and K. Banaszek, e-print quant-ph/0207117.
26. D.E. Browne, J. Elsert, S. Scheel, and M.B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. A 67, 062320 (2003).
27. J. Eisert, D. Browne, S. Scheel, and M.B. Plenio, e-print quant-ph/0307106.
28. Pieter Kok and Samuel L. Braunstein, Phys. Rev. A 61, 042304 (2000).
29. M. Zukowski, A. Zeilinger, and H. Weinfurter, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 755, 91 (1995)
30. Arun K. Pati and Marek Zukowski, e-print quant-ph/010204.
31. S.L. Braunstein and A. Mann, Phys. Rev. A 51, R1727 (1995).
32. R.A. Campos, B.E.A. Saleh, and M.C. Teich, Phys. Rev. A 40, 1371 (1989).
33. X.B. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 66, 024303 (2002)
34. X.B. Wang, ibid. 66, 064304 (2002).
35. 4 will distort the outcome a little bit.