|
|
Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 395-399
|
|
A comparison of 4 common methods of hand-measured techniques with a computerized technique to measure the first intermetatarsal angle
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ACCURACY;
ANALYTICAL ERROR;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
COMPUTER ANALYSIS;
COMPUTER PROGRAM;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CORTICAL BONE;
FIRST INTERMETATARSAL ANGLE;
FOOT RADIOGRAPHY;
HUMAN;
IMAGE ANALYSIS;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MEASUREMENT;
METATARSAL BONE;
PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
COMPUTER SIMULATION;
HALLUX VALGUS;
HUMANS;
IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
METATARSAL BONES;
MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;
|
|
EID: 10444224588
PISSN: 10672516
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2004.09.005 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (17)
|
|
References (7)
|
