Advances in energy forecasting models based on engineering economics

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volumn 29, Issue , 2004, Pages 345-381

  Worrell, Ernst ^a   Ramesohl, Stephan ^b   Boyd, Gale ^c  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Institute for Ecological Economy Research   (Germany)

^c ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Energy modeling; Industry; Policy; Technology

Indexed keywords

ENERGY MODELING; ENGINEERING ECONOMICS ANALYSIS; INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY (IEA); POLICY EVALUATION; TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION;

DECISION MAKING; DIFFUSION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC POLICY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TAXATION;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

EID: 10444221119     PISSN: 15435938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.29.062403.102042     Document Type: Review

References (106)

1. Craig PP, Gadgil A, Koomey JG. 2002. What can history teach us? A retrospective examination of long-term energy forecasts for the United States. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 27:83-118
2. Zhang ZX, Folmer H. 1998. Economic modeling approaches to cost estimates for the control of carbon dioxide emissions. Energy Econ. 20:101-20
3. Laitner JA, DeCanio SJ, Koomey JG, Sanstad AH. 2003. Room for improvement: increasing the value of energy modeling for policy analysis. Util. Policy 11:87-94
4. DeCanio SJ. 2003. Economic Models of Climate Change - A Critique. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan
5. Intergov. Panel Clim. Change. 2001. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
6. Bertoldi P. 1999. The use of long-term agreements to improve energy efficiency in the industrial sector: overview of the European experiences and proposal for a common framework. In Proc. 1999 Am. Council Energy-Efficient Econ. Summer Study Energy Effic. Ind. pp. 287-98. Washington, DC: Am. Council Energy-Efficient Econ.
7. Börkey P, Lévêque F. 1998. Voluntary approaches for environmental protection in the European Union. OECD Work. Doc. ENV/EPOC/GEEI(98)29/Final, Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev., Paris, Fr.
8. Chidiak M. 1999. Voluntary agreements for energy efficiency in five EU countries. In Proc. 1999 European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy Summer Study, May 31-June 4, Mandelieu, Fr.
9. Hansen K, Larsen A. 1999. Voluntary agreements in industry: a comparative description of the process and a normative analysis. Proc. 1999 Am. Council Energy-Efficient Econ. Summer Study Energy Effic. Ind. pp. 311-24. Washington, DC: Am. Council Energy-Efficient Econ.
10. Krarup S, Ramesohl S. 2000. Voluntary Agreements in Energy Policy -Implementation and Efficiency: Final Report. Inst. Local Gov. Studies (AKF), Copenhagen, Den.
11. Mazurek J, Lehman B. 1999. Monitoring and verification of long-term voluntary approaches in the industrial sector: an initial survey. Proc. 1999 Am. Council Energy-Efficient Econ. Summer Study Energy Effic. Ind., pp. 299-310. Washington, DC: Am. Council Energy-Efficient Econ.
12. Newman J. 1998. Evaluation of energy-related voluntary agreements. Proc. Workshop Int. Netw. Energy Demand Anal. Ind. Sect., pp. 53-62. (LBNL-42368.) Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab.
13. Storey M. 1996. Demand Side Efficiency: Voluntary Agreements with Industry, Policy and Measures for Common Action. Paris, Fr.: Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev.
14. Boyd G. 1996. Impact of Voluntary Agreements on Greenhouse Gas Emission in US Industry. Paris, Fr.: Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev.
15. Ramesohl S. 2000. Social interactions and conditions for change in energy-related decision-making in SMCs - an empirical socio-economic analysis. See Ref. 106, pp. 207-28
16. Laitner JA, DeCanio S J, Peters I. 2000. Incorporating behavioural, social and organizational phenomena in the assessment of climate change mitigation options. See Ref. 106, pp. 1-64
17. Neij L. 1999. Dynamics of energy systems - methods of analysing technology change. PhD thesis, Lund Univ., Lund, Swed.
18. Dowd J, Newman J. 1999. Challenges and opportunities for advancing engineeringeconomic policy analysis. Proc. IEA Int. Workshop Technol. Reduce Greenh. Gas Emissions: Eng.-Econ. Analyses of Conserved Energy Carbon, May 5-7. Washington, DC. http://www.iea.org/ workshop/engecon
19. Lovins AB, Lovins LH. 1991. Least-cost climatic stabilization. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 16:433-531
20. Energy Technol. Syst. Anal. Programme (ETSAP). 1997. New Directions in Energy Modeling, Summary of Annex V (1993-1995). Petten, Neth.: Energy Research Cent. Neth.
21. 2 reduction in Netherlands. Energy Policy 23:1049-62
22. Grübler A, Nakicenovic N, Nordhaus W, eds. 2002. Technological Change and the Environment. Laxenburg, Austria/Washington, DC: IIASA/RFF
23. Martin N, Worrell E, Sandoval A, Bode JW, Phylipsen D. 1998. Industrial energy efficiency policies: understanding success and failure. Proc. Workshop Int. Netw. Energy Demand Anal. Ind. Sect., pp. 1-203 Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab.
24. Worrell E, Price L, Ruth M. 2001. Policy modeling for energy efficiency improvement in US industry. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 26:117-43
25. Interlab. Working Group Energy-Effic. Clean-Energy Technol. 2000. Scenarios for a Clean Energy Future. Oak Ridge, TN/Berkeley, CA: Oak Ridge Natl. Lab./Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab.
26. nd Natl. Ind. Energy Technol. Conf. Apr. 5-6, pp. 84-88. Houston, TX
27. Schipper L, ed. 2000. On the rebound: the interaction of energy efficiency, energy use and economic activity. Energy Policy 28:351-501
28. Jorgenson DW, Goettle RJ, Wilcoxen PJ, Ho MS. 2000. The Role of Substitution in Understanding the Costs of Climate Change Policy. Washington, DC: Pew Cent. Glob. Clim. Change
29. Velthuijsen JW. 1995. Determinants of investment in energy conservation. PhD thesis. Univ. Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Neth.
30. De Groot HLF, Verhoef ET, Nijkamp P. 2001. Energy saving by firms: decision-making, barriers and policies. Energy Econ. 23:717-40
31. Parla JCM. 2000. Physical indicators of energy efficiency. PhD thesis. Utrecht Univ., Utrecht, Neth.
32. Worrell E, Biermans G. 2004. Move over! Stock turnover, retrofit and industrial energy efficiency. Energy Policy. In press
33. Joskow PL, Rose NL. 1985. The effects of technology change, experience, and environmental regulation on the construction cost of coal-burning generating units. RAND J. Econ. 16:1-26
34. Zimmerman M. 1982. Learning effects and the commercialization of new energy technologies: the case of nuclear power. Bell J. Econ. 13:297-310
35. Lester R, McCabe M. 1993. The effect of industrial structure on learning by doing in nuclear power plant operation. RAND J. Econ. 24:418-38
36. Boyd GA, Molburg JC, Cavallo JD. 2002. Estimates of learning by doing in gas turbine electric power systems. Energy Stud. Rev. 10(2):85-99
37. Boyd GA. 2001. A Probit Model of Energy Efficiency Technology Decision Making. Proc. 2001 ACEEE Summer Study Energy Effic. Ind., Tarrytown, NY, pp. 521-34. Washington, DC: Am. Council Energy-Efficient Econ.
38. Harrington W, Kopp R. 1999. Public Policy, Technology Adoption, and Aggregate Energy Efficiency. Washington, DC: Resour. Future
39. Jaffe A, Stavins R. 1994. The energy paradox and the diffusion of conservation technology. Resour. Energy Econ. 16:91-122
40. Ellsworth RR. 1983. Subordinate financial policy to corporate strategy. Harv. Bus. Rev. 61:170-82
41. Ross M. 1986. Capital budgeting practices of twelve large manufacturers. Financ. Manag. (Winter): 15-22
42. Fazzari SM, Petersen BC. 1993. Working capital and fixed investment: new evidence on financing constraints. RAND J. Econ. 24:328-42
43. Boyd GA, Pang JX. 2000. Estimating the linkage between energy efficiency and productivity. Energy Policy 28:289-96
44. Worrell E, Laitner JA, Ruth MB, Finman H. 2003. Productivity benefits of industrial energy efficiency measures. Energy 28:1081-98
45. Pandey R. 2002. Energy policy modeling: agenda for developing countries. Energy Policy 30:87-106
46. Edmonds J, Roop JM, Scott MJ. 2000. Technology and the Economics of Climate Change Policy. Washington, DC: Pew Cent. Glob. Clim. Change
47. Clarke LE, Weyant, JP. 2002. Modeling induced technological change: an overview. See Ref. 22, pp. 41-92
48. Löschel A. 2002. Technological change in economic models of environmental policy: a Survey. Ecol. Econ. 43:105-26
49. Worrell E, Bode JW, De Beer J. 1997. Analysing Research and Technology Development Strategies: The 'ATLAS' Project, Energy Efficient Technologies in Industry. Utrecht, Neth. : Dept. Sci. Technol. Soc. Utrecht Univ.
50. Van Vuuren DP, de Vries HJM. 2001. Mitigation scenarios in a world at sustainable development: the role of technology, efficiency and timing. Clim. Policy 1:189-210
51. van der Zwaan BCC, Gerlagh R, Klaassen G, Schrattenholzer L. 2002. Endogenous technological change in climate change modeling. Energy Econ. 24:1-19
52. Tseng P, Lee J, Kypreos S, Barreto L. 1999. Technology learning and the role of renewable energy in reducing carbon emissions. Proc. IEA Int. Workshop Technol. Reduce Greenh. Gas Emissions: Eng. Econ. Anal. Conserv. Energy Carbon, Washington, DC, May 5-7
53. Luciuk D. 1999. The Price-Independent Trend in Energy Efficiency in Canada and the Potential Influence of Non-Price Policies. Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser Univ.
54. Newell R, Jaffe A, Stavins RA. 1999. The induced innovation hypothesis and energy saving technological change. Q. J. Economics 114(3):941-75
55. Int. Energy Agency. 2000. Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy. Paris, Fr.: IEA
56. Int. Energy Agency. 2003. Experience curves: a tool for energy policy analysis and design. Proc. Workshop Exp. Curves: Tool Energy Policy Anal. Design, Jan. 22-24. Paris, Fr.: IEA
57. Laitner JS, Sanstad AH. 2003. Learning to capture progress on both the demand and the supply side: implications for electric utility investments. Proc. Workshop Exp. Curves: Tool Energy Policy Anal. Design, Jan. 22-24. Paris, Fr.: IEA
58. Celikkol P, Stefanou S. 1999. Measuring the impact of price-induced innovation on technological progress: application to the US food processing and distribution sector. J. Prod. Anal. 12:135-51
59. Lieberman MB. 1984. The learning curve and pricing in the chemical processing industries. RAND J. Econ. 15:213-28
60. Landau R, Rosenberg N. 1994. Innovation in the chemical procession industry. In Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History, ed. N Rosenberg, pp. 190-202. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press
61. Jarmin RS. 1994. Learning by doing and competition in early rayon industry. RAND J. Econ. 25:441-54
62. Yin JZ. 1994. Managing process innovation through incremental improvements: empirical evidence in the petroleum refining industry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 47:265-76
63. Gruber H. 1992. The learning curve in the production of semiconductor memory chips. Appl. Econ. 24:885-94
64. Bahk BH, Gort M. 1993. Decomposing learning by doing in new plants. J. Polit. Econ. 101:561-83
65. Nelson RR, ed. 1982. Government and Technical Progress. New York, NY: Pergamon
66. Cohen LR, Noll RG. 1994. Privatizing public research. Sci. Am. 271(3):72-77
67. 2 abatement policies. Resour. Energy Econ. 21:211-53
68. Messner S. 1997. Endogenized technological learning in energy systems models. J. Evol. Econ. 7:291-313
69. Luiten EEM. 2001. Beyond energy efficiency. PhD thesis. Utrecht Univ. Utrecht, Neth.
70. De Beer J, Worrell E, Blok K. 1998. Future technologies for energy efficient iron and steelmaking. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 23:123-205
71. Martin N, Worrell E, Ruth M, Price L, Elliott RN, et al. 2000. Emerging Energy-Efficient Industrial Technologies. Berkeley, CA/Washington, DC: Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab./Am. Council Energy-Efficient Econ. (LBNL-46990)
72. Gielen DJ. 1999. Materialising dematerialisation - integrated energy and materials system engineering for greenhouse gas emission mitigation. PhD thesis. Delft Univ. Technol. Delft, Neth.
73. Howarth RB, Sanstad AH. 1995. Discount rates and energy efficiency. Contemp. Econ. Policy 13:101-9
74. Ross MH, Thimmapuram P, Fisher RE, Maciorowski W. 1993. Long-term Industrial Energy Forecasting (LIEF) Model (18-Sector Version). (ANL/EIAS/TM-95.) Argonne, IL: Argonne Natl. Lab.
75. Blok K, de Groot H, Luiten EEM, Rietbergen MG. 2002. The Effectiveness of Policy Instruments for Energy Efficiency Improvement in Firms, Utrecht, Neth.: Dept. Sci. Technol. Soc., Utrecht Univ.
76. Bernow S, Rudkevich A, Ruth M, Peters I. 1998. A Pragmatic CGE Model for Assessing the Influence of Model Structure and Assumptions in Climate Change Policy Analysis. Boston, MA: Tellus Inst.
77. Peters I, Bernow S, Cleetus R, Laitner J, Rudkevich A, Ruth M. 2002. The Influence of Model Structure and Assumptions in Climate Change Policy Analysis: Explorations with a Pragmatic CGE Model. In Critical Issues In International Environmental Taxation, LA Kreiser, ed, pp. 503-22. Riverwoods, IL: CCH Inc.
78. Koopmans C, Velde D. 2001. Bridging the energy efficiency gap: using bottom-up information in a top-down energy demand model. Energy Econ. 23:57-75
79. rd Annu. Meet., Salt Lake City, UT. June
80. Hanson D, Laitner J. 2000. Energy-economy interactions revisited within a comprehensive sectoral model. In Energy 2000: The Beginning of a New Millennium, ed. P. Catania, B Golchert, C Zhou, pp. 742-46. Lancaster, PA: Balaban/Technomic
81. Howarth RB, Andersson B. 1993. Market barriers to energy efficiency. Energy Econ. 15:262-72
82. Stoft SE. 1995. The economics of conserved-energy "supply" curves. Energy J. 16:109-37
83. Blumstein C, Stoft S. 1995. Technical efficiency, production functions, and conservation supply curves. Energy Policy 23:765-68
84. Huntington HG. 1994. Been top down so long it looks like bottom up. Energy Policy 22:833-39
85. 2 reduction: the Dimensions of the Social Challenge. Proc. 1999 Summer Study of the European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, Part 2, Pap. (III. 24). Paris, Fr.: Agence Environ. Maitrise Energy (ADEME)
86. Bandura A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action - A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
87. ShoveE. 1998. Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms: theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings. Energy Policy 26:1105-12
88. Malik F. 1992. Strategie des Managements Komplexer Systeme - Ein Beitrag zur Management-Kybernetik Evolutionärer Systeme. Bern, Switz.: Haupt. 4th ed.
89. Dar-El E. 2000. Human Learning: From learning Curves to Learning Organizations. Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer Acad.
90. Senge P. 1994. The Fifth Discipline - The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday
91. Argyris C. 1977. Double loop learning in organizations. Harv. Bus. Rev. 55(5):115-25
92. Cooper W, Seiford L. 1999. Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References, and DEA-Solver Software. Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer Acad.
93. Rogers EM. 1995. The Diffusion of Innovations. New York, NY: Free Press
94. Jovanovic B, Nyarko Y. 1996. Learning by doing and the choice of technology. Econometrica 64:1299-1310
95. Kleit A, Terrell D. 2001. Measuring potential efficiency gains from deregulation of electricity generation: a Bayesian approach. Rev. Econ. Stat. 83:523-30
96. Weidlich W, Braun M. 1992. The master equation approach to nonlinear economics. J. Evol. Econ. 2:233-65
97. Erdmann G. 1990. Evolutionäre Ökonomik als Theorie ungleichgewichtiger Phasenübergänge. In Studien zur Evolutorischen Ökonomik, ed. UWitt, 195:135-61. Berlin, Ger.: Schriften Vereins Socialpolitik
98. Dosi G. 1988. The nature of the innovative process. In Technical Change and Eco nomic Theory, ed. G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, L. Soete, pp. 77-93. London, UK: Pinter
99. DeCanio S, Dibble C, Amir-Atefi K. 2000. The importance of organizational structure for the adoption of innovations. Manag. Sci. 46:1285-99
100. DeCanio S, Dibble C, Amir-Atefi K. 2001. Organizational structure and the behavior of firms: implications for integrated assessment, Clim. Change 48:487-514
101. Bower J, Bunn DW. 2000. A model-based comparison of pool and bilateral market mechanisms for electricity trading. Energy J. 3:1-29
102. North MJ. 2002. Multi-agent social and organizational modeling of electric power and natural gas markets. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory J. 7:331-37
103. North MJ. 2001. Agent-based infrastructure modeling. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 20:307-21
104. Beck MB, Ed. 2002. Environmental Foresight and Models: A. Manifesto. Amsterdam, Neth./New York, NY: Elsevier
105. Gillissen M, Opschoor JB, Farla JCM, Blok K. 1995. Energy Conservation and Investment Behaviour of Firms. Amsterdam, Neth.: Dep. Environ. Econ., Free Univ.
106. Jochem E, Sathaye J, Bouille D, eds. Society, Behaviour, and Climate Change Mitigation. Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer Acad.